this post was submitted on 06 Dec 2024
117 points (97.6% liked)

News

36375 readers
2402 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

U.S. fourth graders saw their math scores drop steeply between 2019 and 2023 on a key international test even as more than a dozen other countries saw their scores improve. Scores dropped even more steeply for American eighth graders, a grade where only three countries saw increases.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Since then, other research into post-pandemic academic performance has found widening gaps across race and income, even as many middle and higher income students are doing well.

Private school vouchers and destroying the Department of Education, and a healthy dose of white nationalist politics will surely address all this

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the intentional plan.

Stupid people are easier to lie to.

Making more people more stupid has been the Republican MO for longer than I've been alive.

At least since Reagan.

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Bad at tests? Better require more tests. Also make school finding dependent on tests. Then teachers can spend all their class time teaching how to take tests. Oh and lets feed the kids hot garbage and stuff them in overcrowded under funded classrooms. America #1 🇺🇲

[–] DashboTreeFrog@discuss.online 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Crazy thing is, research says frequent testing actually improves learning. BUT, the way it's practiced by a lot of educational institutions feels like major misinterpretations of this information. It's about practicing recall, and even better if it's in a practical context and in low to no stakes scenarios.

Like you said, when you put so many incentives on test results, teaching to the test rather than the content becomes the norm, and everyone suffers.

[–] 93maddie94@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The small testing for mastery isn’t the issue and is really all that should be done. It’s the hours and hours of state testing that we require of nine year olds that’s the killer. We do quarterly testing starting in third grade with a major test at the end of the year in both reading and math (plus history for 4th and science for 5th). So leaving elementary school kids have completed 30 state assessments that each take several hours to complete (not every kid needs over an hour but you’re still in the testing environment until everyone is finished). Then, there’s no consequences for failing. You still get promoted to the next grade and you’re invited to summer school but not required to attend. If I recall correctly, the data shows that testing is effective and beneficial if its short term, like a unit test, and not long term like a midterm or final.

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fully agree. We were teaching how to take tests back in the 1990’s. I’m not going to start on how the voucher system is so beyond faulty. Don’t have enough time for that. I also remember when cafeteria food was semi decent. Cafeteria ladies liked my skinny butt back then. Fed he heck out of me.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cafeteria ladies liked my skinny butt back then. Fed he heck out of me.

Doesn't that mean they didn't like your skinny butt?

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The food was pretty decent in the early 90’s. It was made at the school so it was fresh. A sight cheaper as well. This was not more than a few years. Food quality changed dramatically after they wanted to run the cafeteria more like a business.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I see what youre saying and the point you are making, but lets not forget that the guy we just elected thought the solution to rising covid cases was to stop testing.

[–] calabast@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

HOT garbage? And who's paying to heat this garbage up, me? No thank you! Cold garbage is fine for kids!

Lol, no but seriously they'd rather just let kids starve.

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

There was also a strong correlation between socioeconomic status and test scores. Students from higher income households and those who attended schools with more affluent students had higher scores.

I'll be darned.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

Just wait. Trump hasn't even shut down the Department of Education yet. Those scores can go lower!

[–] MooseTheDog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The tests were done during COVID, and they're only a few percentage points different. This article is trying to shit on the US because (checks notes) other countries have improved their education programs. Erica Meltzer shame on you.