this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

16220 readers
2276 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1984@lemmy.today 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's crystal clear that commuting is not part of the work day, but perhaps it should be.

Just like we should only work 6 hours so we can actually have some time after to do things we want, like hobbies or just enjoying time with friends.

Work is consuming people's lives and entire identities.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Set minimum wage for any in-office position to match the amount required to purchase a house within 15 minutes average transit to the office.

[–] June@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Min 250k salary in Seattle lol.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Seattle should build more walkable neighborhoods with a metro, lol.

[–] taranasus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

This is easy: would I be going there daily if I didn't have to per the employers requirements?

If yes: then it's my problem not the employer If no: it's the emplpyer's problem not mine

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I used to work for a company that had the right idea. We brought our work trucks home, and our work day started when we turned the key, and ended when we got home.

Had to be at a job for 8 and it was an hour away? You were paid for that. Only had a job 5 minutes away? Enjoy the extra sleep in time and the short commute home.

Now, this is way different than an office job that is stationary, but there is definitely a conversation to be had about it. If nothing else, it may have more companies going back to taking WFH seriously again instead of needlesslt forcing people back into office spaces in order to prop up the commercial real estate sector.

[–] EditsHisComments@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

In many Labor Economic Models, the distinction in Time is measured as Time spent working vs Time spent not working, in which the commute is factored. Many companies deal with people's reluctance to commute by offering better pay or better benefits (if they're seeking specific skillsets that are more difficult to find close by), but sometimes you find a gem like your company.

I know it would be difficult to implement for many companies, but I wish more companies did something like that when they could. The company I work for doesn't pay for commutes from home, but will pay for them if you are temporarily relocated to a different office by calculating the distance between the two offices and average fuel price

[–] The_v@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

When I had a 1hr commute through heavy city traffic, I needed a break when I walked in the door. It took me at least an hour to get up the energy to do anything. Most of the time I would sip coffee while pretending to read e-mails or talk to coworkers. My body might be there but I wasn't doing anything. So the company was paying for my recovery time from the "work" of the commute.

I don't know why any company would push an employee into a long commute if it's not necessary. It costs the company a ton of money in productivity.

It's the problem with companies focusing on time spent, not productivity. I can waste a ton of time and get nothing done if I am so inclined.