this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2026
1144 points (99.1% liked)

politics

31868 readers
2510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A petition calling on House Democrats not to support House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries as the next Speaker has hit 500,000 signatures, according to its creator.

It follows the Democrats' dramatic midterm election victory that saw the party flip both the Senate and the House of Representatives, which will lead to a new Senate Majority Leader and Speaker of the House.

The petition, which labels Jeffries part of the “Democratic establishment,” suggests Democratic leaders are likely to remain under pressure from their party’s left-wing over both personal and policy choices. It was created by Nicole Whitted, an author and Democratic supporting social media creator with over 210,000 followers on TikTok.

For those who don't want to give newsweek a click: https://www.change.org/p/house-democrats-choose-a-new-speaker

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 159 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

If you're going to do one thing, contact your Rep and Senator and tell them to change leadership. It'll carry more weight than a change.org petition.

(Yes, I know that's technically two things).

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 58 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yep - already sent this to my rep:

Now that the democratic party will have a majority in both houses of Congress, I and your constituents, along with democrats across the country, demand an end to the lackluster democratic leadership currently in place. We require new majority leaders that will actually hold Trump and his allies responsible for the many crimes that they have committed against this country and others worldwide. Please lend your support to candidates that will support action against this criminal behavior. Justice is what will ultimately help our nation to heal, not "moving on" or ignoring what has happened.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Janx@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Contact your representatives and sign the Change org petition. It shows public pressure and only takes a few minutes, so why not?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 106 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If it's truly a new political era, like the pundits have all claimed, then it stands to reason that we should embrace new leadership. I have very little faith in Schumer and Jefferies.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They let MAGA rise and re-rise, and they've done NOTHING since to demonstrate that they've earned or deserve a THIRD chance to fuck it up. It's time for some competence in our government, and these two losers ain't it.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

This really should be the nail in the coffin for them. Even if you don't think they're corrupt factional warriors whose purpose is to stymie change, they've been in their positions forever and had no real successes to show for it.

At least Pelosi had the myth that she was a great vote counter and could wrangle representatives well. These two assholes are just incompetent losers.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago

I have very little faith in Schumer and Jefferies.

That's still a little too much

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (16 children)

The original concept of change.org was that average folks could petition leaders with the backing of many people. You didn't earn money from petition-creation efforts.

According to the petition, "Nicole Whitted is a Change Ambassador who receives compensation in connection with this petition."

I found myself wondering what a "Change Ambassador" was, search said, "Ambassadors receive a flat advance payment plus performance-based compensation—often ranging from $0.30 to $0.50 per signature collected over a specified period.

It seems that as of 2024, change.org has become a way to earn a small fortune. If she gets 50 cents for each signature, and this one hit half a million signatures, then she just made $250,000.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I really need to get into grifting. It seems very profitable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So this person made somewhere between $150-250k for posting this? How do I become a Change Ambassador?

e: You have to have a social following of >100k. You get an upfront payment based on audience size, then performance-based payouts for each petition on top of that.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't know this was a thing, gross.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (5 children)

But where does that moeny supposedly come from? Ads aren't likely to generate that much per person signing.

[–] monotremata@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I dunno. I could see campaigns being willing to pay a fair bit for a list of email addresses of people who care about a specific topic.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Where do I sign?

Edit: never mind, found it and signed

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

I posted it!

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago

The House Speaker should be AOC. Jeffries will hinder the Democrats for 2028.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 49 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Get rid of him and get rid of Schumer. Get rid of anyone who supports Israel in their genocide and their apartheid state.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago

Get rid

Every two years there is a vote for leadership...

Mainstream media immediately jumped on those two shitbirds as the default, but they have absolutely zero claim.

They don't reflect the values of Dem voters, and they're both shitty leaders. There is zero reason to give them leadership, or to keep determining committee chairs based solely off seniority.

People are so used to how neoliberals ran shit for 30 years, they forget there is absolutely nothing making the next congress follow those bullshit traditions.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 49 points 1 week ago

The petition for Jeffries to not be speaker already has more than 5x as many votes as Jeffries had to get elected

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (24 children)

I'd say that Ro Khanna or Pramila Jayapal in terms of seniority and experience and proven progressive streak should become Speaker.

For US Senate, I see nobody better than Senator Sanders who is actually the visionary who helped set this all in motion, unlike Schumer. It's a perfect role and way to cement his legacy in a substantive way.

For both these positions, age is less of an issue and more respect, experience, and understanding of chamber rules matter more.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Being the Senate majority leader requires a different skillset than retail campaigning. We need a progressive in that role, though, definitely, someone who will take risks and bend only when absolutely necessary.

You also don't want to put any potential presidential candidates in there--legislators have a lot of exposure to attack ads by voting for bills they don't 100% agree with but are worth the tradeoffs and a majority leader is going to have less freedom to vote No.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I feel this is exactly why Sanders is perfect for the role, though.

  • He's worked on bipartisan legislation
  • He's one of the most experienced, longest-serving members of Congress.
  • He's by definition "Independent"
  • He is a visionary, and fulfills precisely what is entirely lacking by way of Schumer in lack of passion and willingness to fight.

The mere signal this would send to say that progressives are here to stay for the Democratic party would be massive alone.

That said I'm open to other suggestions, but the options are somewhat limited for experienced progressives who understand Senate rules and decorum and have relationships with much of the Senate.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

He's 85. We wouldn't let an 85-year-old manage an Arby's. I love Bernie, but we gotta get off the gerontocracy.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
[–] heavy@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 week ago

These soft democratic leaders already showed us who they are, and I'm not interested. Get the Pelosi generation tf on out of here. Them and their stupid stock trading and dumb shit kneeling and wishy wishy nonsense.

[–] oppy1984@lemdro.id 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jeffries says the agenda is not about "getting even", what he's really saying is he won't allow any real accountability for criminals because they are fellow politicians. He's clearly not fit for the job.

There is nothing in the rules that says the speaker has to be a member of the house, so I say we push for a speaker who will bring some accountability to the criminals throughout our government and demand that Democrats elect Jack Smith as Speaker of the House.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Let's have Jon Stewart as Speaker of the House.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 33 points 1 week ago

He needs to go. Schumer too. They should no longer be allowed to "lead" us back to hell. i.e. trump.

[–] Kronusdark@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Change.org is really annoying to use. You can’t just sign. You gotta sign, then click through donations and share requests, then click an email link, then skip through more upsells, THEN finally you have signed.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

And then they sell your data to every spam list imaginable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's not for the people first, we're 2nd or 3rd in line. Schumer, you did a great job on the election and picking candidates. Please retire on a high note.

[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Schumer, you did a great job on the election and picking candidates.

With the exception of leaving Angie Nixon to fight alone in Florida. That was some grade A bullshit.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just let him believe that he's done well so he can fuck off and pass the torch. He can retire and go play bridge with the Baileys.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Schumer, you did a great job on the election and picking candidates.

Ah yes. Like Janet Mills, Andrew Vindman, Haley Stevens...

Great picks.

[–] OldManWithACane@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Please, if you are in the US, contact your senators and representatives to urge them to choose better leaders than these milquetoast corporate dems.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 20 points 1 week ago

800,000 now

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[–] phuckelon@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 week ago

This dude is a traitor... he's bros with Kushner.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 week ago

Currently at 881,098 signatures, including mine now.

[–] stateofaffairs@lemmy.today 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is becoming my copy pasta moment. But Hakeem Jeffries...let's start with his charisma. His charisma is more akin to that of a Home Depot bag of paver sand. You search through the poorly stacked pile selecting the one with the least holes. Yet, despite that effort, it still spills it’s contents all over the cart on the way to the register. Not a good look. But useful if you are doing what he is good at doing. Laying the foundation for your country to get paved over by corporate donors.

If that does not speak for itself, then consider this. As a potential Speaker, Mr. Jeffries would face the immense challenge of uniting a fractured party that has not managed to maintain a large and diverse tent of voters since Debbie Wasserman Schultz declared Bernie a non-starter. Mr. Jeffries is simply not capable of standing firm in the face of political opposition. Don’t take my word for it. Perhaps, instead, the ever present consumer advocate Ralph Nader may sway you:

More introspection may lead you to ask yourself whether you are up to leading the House Democrats in their immense and immediate tasks of policy and program restorations and adopting our Constitution’s mandated Congressional independence from the Presidency for the protection and advancement of the livelihoods, peace and freedoms of the American people. There is no indication that you are so willing and prepared. Unfortunately.

His record in Congress has not demonstrated the kind of bold, decisive leadership that the position of Speaker demands. Instead, he has often been seen as a cautious, moderate voice. Dare I say, a voice coming from a very real human (I swear) with a spine made of NeeDoh.

Let’s be frank. In times of crisis or when tough decisions must be made, the leader of the Democratic Party and Speaker of the House is not merely about personality. I understand that. Such positions require a deep understanding of the legislative process, the ability to negotiate, and the resilience to withstand the political pressures that come with the position. Jeffries has not consistently shown these traits in his career. For any informed observers, this must raise serious questions about his suitability for such a high-stakes role.

Finally, to convey my firm belief that Mr. Jeffries is not the right person for the leadership role come January, I paraphrase the amazing Forest Whitaker in his role as PFC Edward Garlick in “Good Morning Vietnam”

Hakeem Jeffries sucks the sweat off a dead man’s balls. I have no idea what that means, sir, but it seems very negative to me.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

He made secretive deals with Jared Kushner

He's a centrist in the hardest left house we've had in decades

He represents the Democratic elite that lost to Trump in 2024, ushering in the most damaging US presidency in living memory

[–] churrodestroyer@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 week ago

Accountability is not revenge, it's justice.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Great, I'll sign it.

Is there one for Schumer too?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Jeffries gotta go! Chuck the cuck gotta go! Fire Fetterman into the sun!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah, they should tabula rasa all of the old guard before moving forward.

load more comments
view more: next ›