this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
631 points (99.8% liked)

politics

31463 readers
2115 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Meta appeared to take down a social media account

Meta didn't "appear" to take down the social media account, Meta took down the social media account.

It's not magic.

You see the same thing here, on Reddit, in forums, they always convince themselves that they're doing the "right thing" whilst doing the wrong thing.

I'm guessing that opponents of "No Kings" mass reported.

A good post/group should piss people off. But mobs gonna mob so mods gonna mod

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 10 hours ago

Fediverse for freedom!

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Why wouldn't they, Suckerberg already bent the knee and kissed the ring. This was an investment by him and these rallies are reducing the value of his investment so he is doing all in his power to slow them down. This has been the identical behaviour of large corporations since world word II when they saluted Nazis because they thought Nazis were going to win.

The best answer is to reduce/stop your usage of websites like facebook and shitter. Yeah I know there is still whatsapp, instagram, google services, android phones etc etc And as they acquire more and more of social media, it becomes hard for a particular individual to completely get off the services these companies provide. But you can pick your battles and atleast remove those which are not really essential to your day to day life.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Suckerberg already bent the knee and kissed the ring

Facebook has always served right wing agendas. long before trump ever came around.

conservatives have always gotten the soft hand, while any liberal rule breakers have gotten the iron fist.

and the reason is simple.

Conservatives are idiots. They click all the links, they watch all the ads, and they generate magnitudes more money than liberals with their adblockers and their inability to believe every bullshit propaganda fad.

I'd wager if they thought they'd get away with it, they'd just straight up ban anyone thats not a die hard conservative, not for any political agenda, but for the pure monetary exploitation.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I think this time is different though. Previously it was working in concert with people who tried to keep the atrocities behind the curtains and pretended to slap facebook on the wrist when they bent the rules. So everything was somewhat concealed in a facade of a justice system that seemed to care. And tech companies played their part by pretending to care. That did slow things down for tech oligarchs to some extent. They had to navigate their way through the justice system to make sure they still didn't end up in a legal tangle.

Now Trump comes, he openly expresses the fact he doesn't give a single shit about any kind of law and is intent on ruling the country like a thug and distort the law for this purpose too. He gives a mandate to every tech company "support me and you can run rampant without even pretending to care about the law, or don't and perish because I will use the said law to completely destroy you". And I think none of us were surprised when every big tech kissed the ring because this was their wet dream.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

yeah, it was their wet dream because pandering to conservatism has always been a money maker. Its why every social media ever has always given wristslaps to conservatives for major rule violations, while liberal users get bans for minor infractions.

Cause conservatives as their bread and butter money makers. Always have been, Always will be. Nothing has changed except for how openly they parade their preferential treatment.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

You demand answers? The answer is pretty obvious: Zuck wants there to be a king.

Mark is not someone who particularly enjoys travel or, in fact, people. And I know he’s hoping to have another baby in 2017, so this doesn’t make any sense as a personal challenge. “Are there any states in particular you want to go to?” I ask tentatively. “Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania.” Ugh. The traditional stops for presidential candidates.

  • Careless People
[–] heartSagan5@lemmy.zip 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, Zuck wants to be the Court Jester.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

Maybe. Doesn't mean he doesn’t want a king.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago

A mere blip. You don't think the whole "No Kings" folks are stupid enough to just rely on Facebook, do you? Only trump and his minions would be that stupid, but they're stupid for truth social and old twitter.

[–] solidheron@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago

Yeah, anyone surprised the empire strikes back? Come on the Brain rit app is gonna get political

[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 87 points 1 day ago (15 children)

It blows me away when I meet leftist activists who refuse to stop using corporate social media. The common refrain is "its where everyone is" or "no one uses [insert any decentralized and federated service]".

You cannot liberate yourself, or the rest of society, when you actively use the tools of your oppressors.

[–] Lileath@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, lets just leave all plattforms where we can get a bit of public reach and remove our ability to respond to people talking about us.

Online propaganda gets more necessary every day and leaving mainstream platforms just destroys any capability for it. Use smaller less controlled platforms for people already on your side but the only way to reach the average people will be on stuff like Instagram as long as it stays popular.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

Their reach on the platform will be limited at best by the algorithm, making sure only a minimal number of people see their posts. That's why they need to diversify their medias print.

But telling them to stop using FB altogether… Nah. Even if Meta does this sort of crap, they can scream like they do now. If that scream reaches just a handful of people so that they finally get how bad that company is, or push them just enough to start exploring alternatives, that's a win.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Nothing more cowardly than this opinion

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 3 points 17 hours ago

You just gotta get them join the community on a federated or otherwise uncontrolled channel. Just like all these shitty communities want me to join their Discord.

[–] molten@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look, I agree for the most part. Fuck FB and X and all the rest to hell. But organizers know that you need the most people you can get to have a chance of making a difference. That means you use every tool available for outreach. I've seen protests organized entirely on non-corporate platforms and they are... Small. You don't see those in the news and people driving by generally ignore them. If you can get the hype going through tiktok or facebook or whatever and get hundreds of people on board you can bring attention and make a difference. Now something I've seen done is using them to pull more people and then moving those people to decentralized options.

[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago

Then funnel them onto the fediverse from corporate social media, as you mentioned. The house is on fire, get them out of it.

Educate people (campaigns), organize tech workshops showing people how to use the other tools, set up local servers that can be used for organizing existing groups. Frame corporate social media as part of the data center problem... There's so many ways to approach it but as long as you keep using those tools, you will never carry through with getting people onto the fediverse. You can never just move them to decentralized spaces if not enough people use it, so use it (I know you are already though as we're here :)

Change is hard. But global climate collapse and WW3 are far worse options.

This is how I feel when I meet leftist activists who refuse to stop eating meat

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I tried to get about 2 dozen people to leave a Slack channel and move over to a Matrix room.

Wanna guess how many takers I got? And these are all technically proficient people.

Zero.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 212 points 1 day ago (16 children)

There is only one correct answer: stop using Facebook

[–] Z745812939054@lemmy.zip 48 points 1 day ago (23 children)

after years of saying this, i gave up. people have integrated facebook into their lives to the degree that saying "delete facebook" is pretty much the same as saying "cut your own balls off." they won't do it, no matter if they even acknowledge facebook sucks and is a waste of time. that's rare, though. usually it's "i can't leave facebook, i would lose contact with everyone!" same shit with twitter, instagram, ticktock, snapchat--all that bullshit

[–] nforminvasion@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

TIL I'm a eunuch

[–] chilicheeselies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The reality is you only lose contact with people who don't matter enough anymore. When I left around 15 years ago I reached out to those I wanted to keep in touch with and made sure I had their number. Anyone else if they looked hard enough could find me elsewhere if they wanted, or already had means to contact me directly. Most did not.

But guess what? My relationships with people are deeper. It's been wildly positive for me. The only issue I had at the time was missing out on events from acquaintances, but that's not an issue anymore with alternative apps

[–] khaleer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

people live shallow af lives in general

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They're not the only ones.

Reddit stole the r/NoKings subreddit and has locked it out. They claim it's up for adoption as of 5-months-ago but will of course never cede it to the organizers of No King's.

ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN etc., have barely mentioned it, and it doesn't remotely come up in Google News save for a sparse few pages of local news stories.

The only good news from representing my area is that while the protest was half the size of past ones, general support from people on the road was much higher with much less dissent.

[–] Mastengwe@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Reddit is fully up MAGA ass. sPutz is a wannabe Musk so Reddit-anything is going to side with the nazis.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Peter Thiel is one of reddit's long time investors. They like to keep this out of conversation.

It's up there with Musk buying Twitter and Zuck being Facebook. They manage to sell themselves to normies as the social media that's not like the others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitteroldcoot@piefed.social 87 points 1 day ago (4 children)

'We demand answers'???? Are you joking???

Zuckerberg is practically glued to trump side like a fashion accessory.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

‘We demand answers’

Zuckerberg replied: "Dumb fucks".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Rcklsabndn@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There were protests all over my city yesterday and I can find barely any coverage. I even looked at Reddit, which was flooded with No Kings pictures back in March, and there was barely anything for the events yesterday. Definitely sus as hell.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is why protest has to be disruptive. A bunch of people holding funny signs in a park on a Saturday afternoon doesn't have an impact.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Sure it does. People build networks at these events. One of the tactics of fascism is to make dissenters feel they are alone and maybe crazy for feeling the way they do. These events tell people that they are not alone, and it is actually the authoritarians that are crazy, not them.

For a non-violent resistance campaign to succeed, you need to build up the numbers and reach a threshold of people working together to impede the actions of the authoritarians. You don't accomplish this by engaging in violent actions, that just scares people away and gives justification for the authoritarians to do violent reprisals. Violent acts actually help the authoritarians gain more power, non-violent resistance drains their power.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

I never said protest should he violent. I said it should he disruptive. Violence =/= civil disobedience.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the first I'm hearing about it. There was a NoKings protest yesterday?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meta is a national security threat.

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oligarchs are a global security threat and must be met with extreme prejudice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nastronot@lemmy.zip 56 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The answer appears self evident. Don’t use Meta and that includes INSTAGRAM.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›