this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2026
547 points (96.8% liked)

Climate

9075 readers
94 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nul42@lemmy.ca 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Neither party campaign's on climate policy so the problem is the party, not the voter.

[–] Kirk@startrek.website 17 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Not sure where you saw that but it's actually central to the DNC platform.

Personally, I think this is more of a media diet issue. Climate policy isn't very engagement-baitey so the Social media algorithms don't push it.

[–] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Platforms are not the problem, the problem is that most politicians do not really believe in implementing them

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] story@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago (4 children)

which oil executive should i vote for

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago

Oil/lobbying industry spent decades demonizing and deflecting global activism, by portraying them as eco-extremist/ecoterrorist. the lesser known method is them funding campaigns or even companies to tell you to buy thier "low carbon emission footprint" products so they dont have to reduce thier own emissions. and also funding "protestors" to deface public property.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] itsjustachairmary@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think things like voter suppression, access to information also weigh a lot heavier than some might think.

I'm also kind of wondering how they came up with this number of 11 million, if people are not politically motivated and activated but are still politically conscious enough to have priorities, there are systemic issues keeping them from voting. And especially at these large numbers, simply saying 'well they should vote' and being angry about them supposedly not voting won't change a damn thing.

We don't need to yell at people. We need to fucking strategize.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (9 children)

Check any political thread here or elsewhere and you will hear a regular refrain of "both parties are the same" and "voting doesn't matter because it's all rigged!" A huge percentage of Americans have fallen for that line of bullshit and now don't bother to vote at all no matter what they think is important. It's a sad fact that propaganda works.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LeighWeighTacoma@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (18 children)

I did vote so this isn't my personal opinion. I've been told many times it's "voting for the lesser of two evils, they're both evil and I don't agree with either." There's no real sense of choice. I can see it. It very much feels like that South Park episode where they have to vote for the school mascot. Do you want it to be a Giant Douche or, a Turd Sandwich? And then at the end it was all for nothing because they don't change their mascot so it was all pointless.

Edit: you guys can call me stupid all you want. It doesn't change the fact that I've heard this from coworkers and family repeatedly. I did vote. In fact, I've already voted in my primaries. The question was "why don't people vote?" I gave the answer of why I personally have been told by people they don't vote. Not liking my answer doesn't change the reality of it. I work in blue collar work. It's a very common view in my area. Or, they are pro Trump.

My personal opinion on why they don't vote or, don't vote in favor of things they support, they generally don't want to take the time to educate themselves. And for others, they don't want to feel responsible for voting when their candidate turns out to be nothing like they promised.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Hey heads up the “both sides” argument makes anyone who says it sound fantastically silly and at worse stupid.

[–] LeighWeighTacoma@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

The question was "why don't they vote like it?" I answered the question from what I've been told by multiple coworkers and family. I didn't say, "this is my opinion." In fact, I said this is not my opinion and I did vote. Just because you don't like the answer, doesn't mean a lot of people don't believe that. I think it's a terrible argument personally however, the question didn't ask my opinion, it was asking why those people don't vote like it. I simply shared what has been told directly to me by the people who refuse to vote.

[–] 13igtyme@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Most people that say both side AND still vote, almost never vote in primaries. Many don't even know what they are.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Speaking of sounding stupid...

at ~~worse~~ worst

FTFY

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 week ago (56 children)

if clearly motivated people don’t want to vote for you, it’s not an indication that they should lower their standards, it’s an indication that you should have standards to begin with

it’s cute how liberals here are so resilient to reality. people don’t care for slow, steady, painfully incremental progress (if even that) when every summer is so much hotter than the last one.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

There hasn't even been slow progress for anything but shifting right. We have been losing everything from the new deal.

It's literally their equivalent of trickle down economics. SOMEDAY IT WILL HAPPEN DESPITE ALL EVIDENCE SHOWING OTHERWISE

load more comments (55 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (26 children)

Both candidates were pro war. War is the top polluting activity humans do. People chose not to vote last time because we had absolutely miserable candidate choices, an undemocratic primary, and formal war crimes support from our own party. Anyone who wags a finger after that shenanigans and talks about climate in isolation from the rest of it is missing the forest through the trees.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] joeschmoe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (21 children)

I mean, they don't even care enough about their warmongering, lying, felonious child rapist of a president. French students are legit protesting harder than Muricans against their pedophile leader. Make it make sense.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (15 children)

As we all know, if you just keep telling people to vote, eventually they'll just be like "Yeah! I'm gonna take off work from the job that doesn't give me time off, go find a polling place, which isn't close and crowded because the state doesn't run enough polling places, then try to go there in a town without public transportation! Why didn't I think of this sooner?" Then they get there and find out that most of the local elections are uncontested and the federal ones have only a choice between no climate policy and climate policy which is insufficient but delays the necessary work until it's too late. Then after begrudgingly voting, they realize that their districts are so gerrymandered their vote basically didn't count anyway.

Nope, no need to change anything, we just need to keep telling people to go vote. It hasn't worked yet, but... uh....................................

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

To be clear, this isn’t telling you not to vote. It’s telling you to do more than vote.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (12 children)

Because the Democrats also have a terrible climate policy?

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

They have reasonably positive policy, they just are as usual terrible at explaining activity.

The Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act had quite a bit of green incentives for regular people, and it created widespread solar and non-fossil-fuel home improvements that did (in my area at least) translate to a lot of green tech being installed, not just on-paper policy.

The GOP and Trump especially are irrationally hostile to green tech, and there are plenty of examples why they're materially worse - paying again just to cancel an already-paid-for wind farm project for example.

So this isn't really a "both sides suck" problem. One side has a slightly positive policy that could be a lot better. One side is in a psychotic delusional fugue and actively trying to destroy the planet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But... But... Al Gore?

Wait. They have a policy? Maybe the progressive wing, but that's too small for an official policy.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] tigermountain@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think a more interesting question would be, regardless of someone's priorities, why they don't vote.

[–] thecaptaintrout@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago

I know for a lot of people it's A. Didn't feel like their vote mattered, B. None of the candidates matched their desires, I.e. non of the above earned their vote, whether by not lining up on issues, or being perceived to only give stated values lip service, C. Voter suppression, whether that be inability to go vote because work/schedule, voter roll purges, voter eligibility being repressed due to cost of documents, no transportation access to polling place, etc, D. Being too burnt out to even paying attention to politics/voting; or some combination of the above.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LemmySuxNow@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which of the two pro-corporate neoliberal parties in the US care about the environment again?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

You won’t be seeing much in the way of “climate change” messaging this time around because it’s been rolled into “reducing energy costs” messaging. Since LCOEs for solar and wind have fallen below natural gas plants, which were previously the cheapest if you ignored the SCC, politicians have decided to rebrand. Campaigning on cutting energy costs polls much better when the economy is in poor shape so this is more effective.

It’s also worth noting that the last time that Democrats controlled the legislature and the executive they took substantial action;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_Reduction_Act#Energy_and_climate_change

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Most people want to eat dinner but many refuse to pray for it.

[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 10 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Listen, existential threats are important and all, but there's a trans kid who wants to play soccer, and I vaguely remember something about a tan suit, so... I think I'll just sit this one out - surely my countrymen can be trusted to make the right decision!

Gotta have standards, ya know?

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago

You can really tell it's election season, every thread on 4chan and reddit is about trans people in sports. Bots heavily pushing it.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The GOP brand is practically solid gold. No matter how shitty their members keep being, the average American voter will still see the party as reasonable and worthy of power. Massachusetts is the bluest of blue states but ask a neolib about a past republican government and they will talk about them like they were the only voice of reason. Complete disregard for the fact all of them left beind a fucking mess in lock step with their parties destructive principles and policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

They probably let idiots/bots convince them not to vote over some culture war bullshit or wedge issue designed specifically to keep them away from the polls.

[–] rumimevlevi@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Probably because both party do not care about climate, they should still at least vote for the green

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We might get some of them out to vote if there were someone on the ballot with progressive climate views they were willing to vote for. I'm not saying it's 100% guaranteed to work, but we could try it, just once maybe, and see what happens.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (7 children)

because climate concerns are not a concern with either party? both sides may not be the same, but they hold the same views on 90% of all things. and more and more that last 10% seems to be things they want but are still ashamed about it.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah but you still gotta vote.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (21 children)

sure that’s why i vote third party, or candidates i know push my interests. I will not vote for establishment democrat.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude, even with the new DSA Democrats I barely hear anything related to climate. Sometimes the green new deal is mentioned, but the only thing that is supposedly radically transforming the economy is AI, not the Democrats, the leftists or anyone with a voice in US politics. It's really frustrating.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›