this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2026
191 points (98.0% liked)

politics

31431 readers
1996 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Witch hunts are back in vogue with Kansas Republicans—literally.

Ty Masterson, the Republican candidate in the Kansas gubernatorial race, accused his Democratic opponent, Cindy Holscher, of being an actual witch capable of “demonic” magic, while speaking at the Praise Chapel in Wichita on Sunday.

Masterson introduced the dubious portion of his pseudo-sermon by suggesting that God wanted him to run for Kansas’s top political office. 

“God’s armies are out there in this,” Masterson said. “What we’re fighting right now is a spiritual battle that I’ve never seen before, in [this] state, in this politics.

“Evil is maturing with the brotherhood, and it is rising to a level that is just in your face,” Masterson continued as a pianist played a contemplative melody beside him. “Really, my race and the U.S. Senate race with Roger Marshall versus [Adam] Hamilton. Those are spiritual battles.

“Like I said, my opponent, she didn’t even hide it,” Masterson added. “She talked—they had witch—I mean, they’re doing like witchcraft spells on TikTok so she can win the governorship. I mean, they’re like … it’s like demonic stuff that they’re doing, right? Just in your face that way.”

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Imagine being a grown-ass man and thinking magic spells work through Tik Tok.

Everyone knows they only work on Instagram Reels.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

They only work on Etsy. That's why they banned witches from selling their services there.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago

They don't actually believe most of this stuff though, they are playing the sheep.

Covid did make me realize a lot more of them believe it more than I thought though.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Masterson added "Then she turned me into a newt! But I got better...."

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

Witches are preferable compared to a bunch of Trump supporters.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Why not.

They beleive in a sky fairy that grants wishes.

A demon that they can shift blame to for all their misdeeds.

A magical land they get to go to after being pieces of shit so long as they repent, no matter the damage to people that the victims have to live with long after the PoS dies.

So witchcraft is right up their alley.

Or maybe they don’t actually beleive any of that and they’re just horrible humans that selfishly push their way through life while using fake religion as a shield. No difference, really.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In my experience it's usually the ones who invoke the name of God at every corner who aren't to be trusted.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 9 points 3 days ago

I mean, it's just other magic.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Amen brotha!

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 days ago

He's the one casting Stupefy.

[–] GonzoAtBarstow@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What also floats in water?

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Mister_Feeny@fedia.io 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Very small rocks

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But does she weigh the same as a duck?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago

Who are thee who is so wise in the ways of science?

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The satanic panic losers always strike me as insincere and performative, but they'll use it to slander, abuse, and dehumanize.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They made me WANT to listen to "devil music" in the 80s.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That was also probably the goal. By talking about it constantly and making it sound more intense and interesting to everyone, it both scares their people more and intrigues other people. They bring the obedient and impressionable in and compel them to not partake, and they push the rebellious and skeptical into doing the thing they are already demonizing. You freely enjoyed a form of media because they demonized it and thus the hordes of heathens grew, strengthening their influence and control over the in-group.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why do the evil people always point at someone else and say the evil is over there? Actually that's not my question, my question is why do people fall for it when they do this?

[–] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 3 days ago

The professional class is given to believing bullshit too, and they've all been educated by societies' standards.

Even in grade through high school, critical thinking and evaluating sources was drilled into us.

I think the failure is the anti intellectual bent in this country, which I believe was fostered by the rich in the business roundtable of 1971 that made a long game to overthrow liberal democracy.

Not being critical is hardly the only thing to mention, the nihilistic worldview where nothing matters other than money for oneself, that it's not dishonorable to make obscene profits parasitically feeding on productive companies, killing of History class in any real way and corrupting what is left, and so forth.

[–] fratermus@piefed.social 6 points 3 days ago

Why do the evil people always point at someone else and say the evil is over there?

psychological projection and/or political expediency

Actually that’s not my question, my question is why do people fall for it when they do this?

A subset of the population wants to fall for it. There was a recent essay (can't find it now) that described public repetition of the dear leader's bullshit as a way to demonstrate membership in the tribe. A political altar call, if you will. In this scenario the more outrageous the statement the better it functions to show group loyalty. "I am willing to say this galactically stupid and trivially disprovable stuff in public so I must be a true believer, right? Right?"

[–] Hermit_Lailoken@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Brainwashed/indoctrination since childhood.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 days ago

why do people fall for it when they do this?

stupidity.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They be eatin moldy grains.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I know the reference but just fyi, this was not nearly as common as claimed and not responsible for a lot of witch trial stuff. It was more like cops interrogating people until they freak out, then claim "fine I wrote my name in the devil's book, but Becky did too!!" And then it ended up some prosecutorial bullshit with them wanting a confession out of everyone.

The "funny" thing is, those that confessed and repented often survived and lived normal lives. It's more people that denied it and had others claim they were witches were executed.

And there are weird instances like a guy who confessed but was still executed... But he legitimately was giving divinations, and telling people how many children they would have. Like a back in the day psychic. The witch trial stuff really, really didn't like divination. Herbs and midwifery stuff was way less of a big deal, and an honored profession being a "physic". It was not considered witchcraft to use herbs to heal people unless you did weird rituals.

For grain to give you hallucinations, it has to be rye grain and in a cold and wet climate, which ergot specifically would grow in. Then the rye grain itself would grow big black visible horns, and they would still need to not discard that obvious contaminated grain and grind it into flour. Then that flour was eaten, and they hallucinated. And it fucked up your veins and gave you black limbs often too.

There's often not great evidence for this phenomenon unless they are in a cold and damp area growing rye, and report the medical issues on top, black limbs.

People act like if you let bread mold it'll grow it, but that's not the case. It's much more rare of a phenomenon, a fungus that attacks rye itself.

[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

And then there's Agrippa, the chad who successfully defended someone accused of sorcery against the Inquisition. Still had to leave town afterwards.

[–] GreenBean@lemmy.today 2 points 3 days ago

(Psst. It'll grow on wheat, barley and oats, too.)

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 5 points 3 days ago

What is Wrong with Kansas?

How much time do you have?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I didn't have the possibility of resurrecting the witch trials on my apocalypse bing-card.

[–] nightofmichelinstars@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Really? These walnuts are all over the country. And the satanic scare wasn't exactly centuries ago.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Pink triangles/genocide? Yes.

Them undertaking the effort to host a witch trial first? No. Simply, genocide w/o due process is cheaper and easier.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They should really lean into this by making a Wizard of Oz-themed television advertisement.

[–] Hackworth@piefed.ca 1 points 3 days ago

Are you a good witch or a bad witch?

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 9 points 3 days ago

Wow, so do they like travel by carriage and stuff in Kansas or something? Do they even know when century we're in? 'Cause that's like the oldest slur that predates calling everyone a communist. FFS

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

In a postindustrial society, in the third decade of the 21st century of the common era. A member of the legislative branch believes in witches.

Jesus masturbating on a skateboard, I hate this timeline.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

Stop making your opposition look awesome challenge.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

His is an indirect argument for Christian Nationalism. God strictly forbids witchcraft and sorcery.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

It's hilarious how the radical right wing xtians will quote "thou shalt not suffer a witch to live", but according to their own claims, they worship a witch.

What do you call the claims of magic that their guy did, if not witchcraft?

I mean, I know they like to pull this Jedi mind trick and claim that what their guy does isn't witchcraft, but what their enemies' magicians do is, but....

[–] Cris_Citrus@piefed.zip 2 points 3 days ago