this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
189 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31196 readers
1685 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s advisers have been working for months to move his focus away from baseless theories of election fraud. A group of outsiders is making that difficult.


Of all the outside advisers urging President Trump to seize control of federal elections this fall, the attorney Peter Ticktin can claim the deepest ties; the two men went to military school together as teenagers. In 2022, Ticktin helped Trump sue Hillary Clinton. This year, he pushed Trump to secure a pardon for Tina Peters, a former Colorado clerk convicted of charges related to tampering with election equipment.

Which is why it might be worth listening when Ticktin says that Trump could do something soon to take over elections. “He’s the only one that I know for sure has the understanding of the severity of it,” Ticktin told us this month before taking the stage at an election-skeptic conference in Las Vegas. The way Ticktin sees it, there are three possible outcomes this fall. The first—a smooth election—won’t happen in his view because, he claims without evidence, Democrats already cheated in the primaries. The second is that Trump takes action before the election to prevent cheating. The last option is that Trump tries to declare martial law on or around November 3. “Either martial law, or step aside,” he told us about Trump’s choices in the last scenario. When we asked about the prospect of riots if Trump tries to overturn the election results, Ticktin said he was not concerned. “Believe me, our armed forces are a lot bigger than they are,” he said.

Trump has already tried to claim greater federal control over elections, which under the Constitution are administered primarily at the state and local level. In February, he said Republicans should nationalize voting in at least 15 places. In August, when the television and radio host Wayne Allyn Root pushed Trump to declare a “national-security emergency” to require proof of citizenship, voter ID, and other measures, Trump played coy: “Let me just say that stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that.” Later that month, Trump posted a Root column on the topic, with a headline that described the plan as “foolproof.” Peters announced after meeting with Trump in June that the president “basically said to his lead counsel to do what I was asking.” In a prime-time address at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump again repeated the false claim that he had won the 2020 election, and sarcastically encouraged his supporters to “cheat like hell” in the upcoming elections.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

These people are in utter panic that some Republicans may possibly face consequences for what they have done.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That is the only chance for those losers to keep their seats.

[–] Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Or he could just keep violating every rule with impunity as he has been for the last decade

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So this guy just got put on The List.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

You should listen to Bitin' List by Tyler Childers.

[–] moldy_rice@piefed.keyboardvagabond.com 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We need to pass a law that says any civil servants who advocates for martial law or curfews immediately goes to jail.

[–] SwifferWetjet@thelemmy.club 3 points 14 hours ago

Seemed to do decent in Belfast. Oh, ah, up the RA 😂

[–] MyOpinion@lemmy.today 64 points 2 days ago (28 children)

MAGAts are the worst form of scum.

load more comments (28 replies)
[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The reason the winner of every Democrat primary was a Democrat was because the Democrats cheated? Have they been cheating in every primary since the beginning of primaries? That happens every time, almost like it's an intentional part of the system.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

I remember this coming up when the Democrats didn't vote for a Republican speaker of the house...

If your constituency is a bag of rocks, you can just rewrite history on the fly I guess.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The last option is that Trump tries to declare martial law on or around November 3. “Either martial law, or step aside,” he told us about Trump’s choices in the last scenario. When we asked about the prospect of riots if Trump tries to overturn the election results, Ticktin said he was not concerned. “Believe me, our armed forces are a lot bigger than they are,” he said.

This is definitely going to happen, and there is no precedent as to how to deal with it, which makes it more likely it will succeed, as the opposition will be scattered.

Current polling puts the midterm elections into the blowout category, with Trump and his allies going down in flames. If Democrats take control, there will be a reckoning. Trump can't have that. He's old and knows that when this run is over, he faces inquiries and likely prison. He can't have that. He will do everything in his power, legal or illegal, to remain in power. He's literally told his republican supporters to "cheat like hell", and to vote, regardless of whether they are registered or not. These are not idle words, they are a call to action.

If Trump does not declare martial law, and the elections come to pass and the democrats win, as strongly indicated by current polling, the next thing will be to claim fraud and refuse to swear them in. While I'd like to think that the Supreme Court might stop such a thing, I'm not confident that is the case.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

If Democrats take control, there will be a reckoning.

Yeah I'll believe it when I see it.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (11 children)

So, what do we do if he does declare martial law before the election?

Not trolling. What should people do? Im looking for any real answer beyond a vague 2nd amendment statement. Just "get your guns" is not an answer. We will be outgunned and murdered if we just grab guns and go to polling places.

Real answer anyone?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 1 day ago

The first thing to remember is that we have never suspended, postponed, or cancelled an election, not even during the Civil War. That is a bright red line that has never been crossed, and should never be crossed.

The elections are run by the states. He can try and suspend them at the Federal level, but most states won't cooperate, including most red states. Especially if he tries to stop them at the last second, when they are already in progress. He doesn't have the authority to end elections, they'll just have them anyway.

MAGAs have ambitions, too, and they see Trump's days ending, and they want their chance. Everybody is just about fed up with protecting Trump's treasonous ass. Now the MAGAs are supposed to shelve their own ambitions to support an increasingly demented, dying, and irrelevant old pedophile?

And elections are about more than Federal offices. There are a lot of state and local elections that have to happen, too. Cancelling elections doesn't just prevent Congress from flipping, it gums up the governmental systems from top to bottom.

All that said, this is an indication that MAGA is on the verge of panic, and that makes them very dangerous. They have until 2028 to gain full control of the population, or the top people are going to prison, or worse. They are more aware of this than most citizens, who still believe that those at the top will face no punishment. They will, and they KNOW it. As one German general said, after hearing that the Soviet Army had defeated the invading Nazi army, and was now marching toward Berlin: "If they treat us half as bad as we treated them, we're in big trouble." That's what MAGA is thinking.

So they HAVE to stay in power, they simply have to. Anything less, means severe punishment, so they will have to get vicious to keep it, because they have no choice.

Get prepared, Citizen, the next two years are going to be like no other time in American history.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

What we should have been doing since 2016. Building a shadow state, the same way the Republicans have. A coalition of the willing prepared to organize, do logistics, move people and resources outside official channels. Organize community relief efforts and distribute information that subverts the Trumpists narrative. Make no mistake there may be a time where violence becomes unavoidable, but even then, an army marches on its stomach. The most powerful weapon ever built isn't a nuclear bomb, its logistics, and it always has been.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be honest? Unless the military steps in, you are cooked and even if they do, a despot could fill the power vacuum. I would recommend everyone reading this to gather their friends and family and prepare for the worst. This channel is a good place to get started.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

We will be outgunned and murdered if we just grab guns and go to polling places.

You may be right.

But.

Thats no reason to just let them win. How many feds can they send to the polls in the US? How many people will be voting at each location? Imagine if half the voters, or more, were armed. Dont tell me "ThAt'S iLlEgAl", because its also illegal to send ice/feds/solders to the polls.

Imagine you are standing on the third story of a burning building. If you jump, you will probably live, but you're going to get hurt. A broken leg or arm. The alternative is burning to death in a fire.

We are on the third story of a burning building now. We see what we have to do. Its not ideal. Its not painless. Its not perfect. We're going to get hurt.

But the alternative is much worse.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have answered this question many times and each variation of it gets removed for inciting violence. So, I will leave it to your imagination. Imagine what General Sherman would advise us to do. Imagine what John Brown would advise us to do.

Doing the right thing is often messy and difficult. Please understand that as polite as they are to your face, your conservative neighbors do not value your life the way you value theirs. This is because conservatives do not experience empathy. They call empathy "woke". They truly hate empathy and empathetic people. Your empathy makes them see you as their enemy. They are not kidding about that. They really do hate "woke" people. Listen to them when they tell you who they hate.

Violence comes much more easily to a conservative than to a normal person. When conservatives see you as their enemy, they will act appropriately. If you don't act first, you are likely to become their victim. Understand that no other country is coming to save us. Resist with force or flee. There is no third option.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There isn't a great answer. The states should file an immediate lawsuit seeking an injunction against the declaration. Depending on the timing, that may well be too little too late. However, if the election is impaired in any way, there should be a nationwide general strike. Everything should be shut down, period. The brave can demonstrate in public, and risk being shot. Those who want to fight back can specifically target companies that support the administration in a variety of unique ways beyond simple boycotts. We will we need to view the U.S. as a country occupied by a hostile force, which is exactly what it would be. Not give up and capitulate, but quietly work to impede the hostile force and grind everything to a halt. Money is the lifeblood of these losers, and impairing their ability to make it is how to hurt them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Pretty compelling story if he nukes Iran, declares unprecedted war situation, declares lockdown, suspends elections, conducts purges , etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

One more for the treason list. That thing is getting longer than the Epstein files.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 7 points 2 days ago

Fuck that noise

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Rioting only works when an overwhelming majority will participate. Even if all the normal people participated (they won't), that still leaves over 100 million conservatives who will support the conservative government take-over. Conservatives will never oppose a conservative coup. Without their participation, rioting alone will simply not be enough to stop the coup.

Rioting will prove that conservatives will gleefully open fire on us and slaughter as many of us as they have ammo for. We will need to do much more than riot. Much more.

According to conservatives, the civil war was not properly finished. After decades of debating with them on that topic, I finally agree. We need to properly finish it or else they will.

[–] DidIReallySayThat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But a civil war now...how do you fight that type of war when theres no physical boundaries? Its not like we can hack in to see who voted for trump, bump them off and it all work out.

We'd have to deal with the billionaires, their murder tech and the psycho-killers they pay to protect them. We'd have to deal with the military, which I understand now has IDF working there too.

What I think just might work is if some of the retired military generals teaming up and getting help from an outside country to neutralize a mutual enemy, but I also dont understand why this hasn't already been done. Or at least attempted.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

I agree with everything you've said. To answer your question about what individuals can do to fight a war with no boundaries or front lines, I look at "the troubles" in Ireland.

While conservatives would call stochastic attacks "terrorism" (only when they are the targets of course), I don't think the term terrorism is accurate in acts of war. These types of attacks would be targeting enemies to eliminate them, not to terrorize anyone or convince anyone to do anything differently.

In a stochastic civil war, we would be focused on eliminating the threat, not scaring or influencing them. A conservative does not change, so attempting to frighten them or influence them is not an effective way to eliminate that threat. Negotiating with pathological liars and narcissists is also not going to work, which brings us back to the need to eliminate the threat without any other agenda.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Sherman needed to cut a second swath in his march to the sea, maybe through Alabama.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed 100%

load more comments
view more: next ›