this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2026
189 points (99.0% liked)

politics

31196 readers
1540 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s advisers have been working for months to move his focus away from baseless theories of election fraud. A group of outsiders is making that difficult.


Of all the outside advisers urging President Trump to seize control of federal elections this fall, the attorney Peter Ticktin can claim the deepest ties; the two men went to military school together as teenagers. In 2022, Ticktin helped Trump sue Hillary Clinton. This year, he pushed Trump to secure a pardon for Tina Peters, a former Colorado clerk convicted of charges related to tampering with election equipment.

Which is why it might be worth listening when Ticktin says that Trump could do something soon to take over elections. “He’s the only one that I know for sure has the understanding of the severity of it,” Ticktin told us this month before taking the stage at an election-skeptic conference in Las Vegas. The way Ticktin sees it, there are three possible outcomes this fall. The first—a smooth election—won’t happen in his view because, he claims without evidence, Democrats already cheated in the primaries. The second is that Trump takes action before the election to prevent cheating. The last option is that Trump tries to declare martial law on or around November 3. “Either martial law, or step aside,” he told us about Trump’s choices in the last scenario. When we asked about the prospect of riots if Trump tries to overturn the election results, Ticktin said he was not concerned. “Believe me, our armed forces are a lot bigger than they are,” he said.

Trump has already tried to claim greater federal control over elections, which under the Constitution are administered primarily at the state and local level. In February, he said Republicans should nationalize voting in at least 15 places. In August, when the television and radio host Wayne Allyn Root pushed Trump to declare a “national-security emergency” to require proof of citizenship, voter ID, and other measures, Trump played coy: “Let me just say that stranger things have happened, okay? I’ll leave it at that.” Later that month, Trump posted a Root column on the topic, with a headline that described the plan as “foolproof.” Peters announced after meeting with Trump in June that the president “basically said to his lead counsel to do what I was asking.” In a prime-time address at the Republican midterm convention in Dallas, Trump again repeated the false claim that he had won the 2020 election, and sarcastically encouraged his supporters to “cheat like hell” in the upcoming elections.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

So, what do we do if he does declare martial law before the election?

Not trolling. What should people do? Im looking for any real answer beyond a vague 2nd amendment statement. Just "get your guns" is not an answer. We will be outgunned and murdered if we just grab guns and go to polling places.

Real answer anyone?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

The first thing to remember is that we have never suspended, postponed, or cancelled an election, not even during the Civil War. That is a bright red line that has never been crossed, and should never be crossed.

The elections are run by the states. He can try and suspend them at the Federal level, but most states won't cooperate, including most red states. Especially if he tries to stop them at the last second, when they are already in progress. He doesn't have the authority to end elections, they'll just have them anyway.

MAGAs have ambitions, too, and they see Trump's days ending, and they want their chance. Everybody is just about fed up with protecting Trump's treasonous ass. Now the MAGAs are supposed to shelve their own ambitions to support an increasingly demented, dying, and irrelevant old pedophile?

And elections are about more than Federal offices. There are a lot of state and local elections that have to happen, too. Cancelling elections doesn't just prevent Congress from flipping, it gums up the governmental systems from top to bottom.

All that said, this is an indication that MAGA is on the verge of panic, and that makes them very dangerous. They have until 2028 to gain full control of the population, or the top people are going to prison, or worse. They are more aware of this than most citizens, who still believe that those at the top will face no punishment. They will, and they KNOW it. As one German general said, after hearing that the Soviet Army had defeated the invading Nazi army, and was now marching toward Berlin: "If they treat us half as bad as we treated them, we're in big trouble." That's what MAGA is thinking.

So they HAVE to stay in power, they simply have to. Anything less, means severe punishment, so they will have to get vicious to keep it, because they have no choice.

Get prepared, Citizen, the next two years are going to be like no other time in American history.

[–] GreenBeard@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 days ago

What we should have been doing since 2016. Building a shadow state, the same way the Republicans have. A coalition of the willing prepared to organize, do logistics, move people and resources outside official channels. Organize community relief efforts and distribute information that subverts the Trumpists narrative. Make no mistake there may be a time where violence becomes unavoidable, but even then, an army marches on its stomach. The most powerful weapon ever built isn't a nuclear bomb, its logistics, and it always has been.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To be honest? Unless the military steps in, you are cooked and even if they do, a despot could fill the power vacuum. I would recommend everyone reading this to gather their friends and family and prepare for the worst. This channel is a good place to get started.

[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I posted this channel in the liberal gun community and it got down voted.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

We will be outgunned and murdered if we just grab guns and go to polling places.

You may be right.

But.

Thats no reason to just let them win. How many feds can they send to the polls in the US? How many people will be voting at each location? Imagine if half the voters, or more, were armed. Dont tell me "ThAt'S iLlEgAl", because its also illegal to send ice/feds/solders to the polls.

Imagine you are standing on the third story of a burning building. If you jump, you will probably live, but you're going to get hurt. A broken leg or arm. The alternative is burning to death in a fire.

We are on the third story of a burning building now. We see what we have to do. Its not ideal. Its not painless. Its not perfect. We're going to get hurt.

But the alternative is much worse.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I have answered this question many times and each variation of it gets removed for inciting violence. So, I will leave it to your imagination. Imagine what General Sherman would advise us to do. Imagine what John Brown would advise us to do.

Doing the right thing is often messy and difficult. Please understand that as polite as they are to your face, your conservative neighbors do not value your life the way you value theirs. This is because conservatives do not experience empathy. They call empathy "woke". They truly hate empathy and empathetic people. Your empathy makes them see you as their enemy. They are not kidding about that. They really do hate "woke" people. Listen to them when they tell you who they hate.

Violence comes much more easily to a conservative than to a normal person. When conservatives see you as their enemy, they will act appropriately. If you don't act first, you are likely to become their victim. Understand that no other country is coming to save us. Resist with force or flee. There is no third option.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There isn't a great answer. The states should file an immediate lawsuit seeking an injunction against the declaration. Depending on the timing, that may well be too little too late. However, if the election is impaired in any way, there should be a nationwide general strike. Everything should be shut down, period. The brave can demonstrate in public, and risk being shot. Those who want to fight back can specifically target companies that support the administration in a variety of unique ways beyond simple boycotts. We will we need to view the U.S. as a country occupied by a hostile force, which is exactly what it would be. Not give up and capitulate, but quietly work to impede the hostile force and grind everything to a halt. Money is the lifeblood of these losers, and impairing their ability to make it is how to hurt them.

[–] Major_Tsiom@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

It depends on how many take to the streets. The cops and military are grossly outnumbered. I don't think they would open fire into crowds of hundreds of thousands of people either. A million people march on the whitehouse and I think that would do it. The thing is that half of us would fight to defend the coup. Well, half of the people who give a shit either way...

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I need $5. And your vote. Just vote harder. And $5.

—The Democratic Establishment

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Imagine taking the democrat's power away before they could try Trump, reelecting Trump as president and calling the democrats powerless.

This is why american democracy is fucked people like that have the power to vote or to choose not to vote.

[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I could see that. I could also see, like if god forbid martial law is declared, the dems chastising their base for not voting enough back in 2024, 2016, etc. and just antagonizing everyone even more. It’s just The Aristocrats in here.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's easy to skirt responsibility by passing it off to the democrats.