this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2026
226 points (89.2% liked)

Technology

89678 readers
2730 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 147 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

It's dead already, then. WinAmp's heritage was providing a free audio player. I was looking forward to a refreshed build to test out, but I won't pay for it.

There are a dozen better, free, maintained, and actively developed players out there. This is less than too little, and far too late. Those of us who used winamp back when it was still activly developed will continue to have nostalgia for it, but I bet it will be DOA to most of the target audience.

I've only kept up on news for it because I was hoping it would be reborn true to itself. I have zero interest in it as a subscription model.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

it appears to be just an added optional feature, a winamp-branded deezer subscription and client, with the traditional local play and customization and what-not still part of the 'free' program (presumably.. details are scarce).

but.. i left winamp years ago. i won't go back. i have playlists sorted and can just use vlc these days. idc about customizing or visualizations and that shit. i just want a player to sit in the background and do its thing. there's dozens of acceptable programs without a subscription sales pitch built in.

[–] RedEyeFlightControl@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Unlike traditional digital streaming platforms, the new Winamp Player will not be limited to music streaming. It will seamlessly combine premium streaming with users' local music libraries, internet radio stations, podcasts, personal cloud-based collections and other audio sources, while introducing a highly customizable interface, new social capabilities and innovative ways to discover, organize and enjoy music.

Source https://www.engadget.com/2259236/winamp-coming-back-2027-deezer-partnership-streaming-music/

It sounds like the local playback is the "optional" feature. That's still gonna be a no, at least for me. Fpr Hifi, I'll stick with FooBar2k, or something that is a proper hi-res FLAC player first and has bolt-ons/plugins second. The same article also links to another, they actually already released a new build of classic winamp a few years ago.

https://www.engadget.com/winamp-mp3-player-software-returns-191027227.html

[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I loved winamp back in the day, but it's been a quarter of a century and now it's primary purpose (the ability to play mp3's) is no longer it's primary purpose. If I'm looking for another music player, it's primary purpose needs to be playing music files, not trying to convince me to sign up for another shitty service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 76 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The MP3 era’s favorite player returns with a monthly subscription.

The sub-subtitle says enough that you should just look elsewhere.

[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Winamp: It really IS the llama's ass.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"To take on streaming"

In a partnership with Deezer, Winamp will be reborn as a completely new player with its own premium subscription service, with Deezer providing the white-label streaming technology and licensed catalog.

So, basically a nostalgic skin for Deezer.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And Deezer is owned by a Russian Oligarch who was personally sanctioned by Ukraine for profiting off of the war.

This is not the Winamp you're looking for.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's coming back with a monthly subscription.

All I want is a simple, nostalgic media player.

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Personally, I've always stuck to VLC. Although Foobar2k's built-in playlists and directory scanning makes for a nice lightweight iTunes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

as a streaming service... That really sucks the llama's ass.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Again. Anyone remember Shoutcast?

Anyway, the old versions of Winamp work just fine for playing your local library.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Winamp will be reborn

No. No, it won't.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago

These owners are just whatever lawyers have gotten ahold of the WinAMP trademark.

Anybody remember when they attempted to push out the source code for WinAMP on GitHub and failed miserably? Or included NFTs?

[–] db2@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

After the "open source" fakeout that was nothing more than them trying to get free work without actually opening the source code for anyone to use, Winamp and Llamasoft or whatever their name is can get bent by an elephant.

I won't even use an old copy in Wine at this point. They fucked up repeatedly and now nostalgia isn't what it used to be. Get fucked, losers of Winamp.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nafzib@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Someone already revived Winamp in the best way years ago with Winamp 2.0 in a browser, complete with all the skins they could salvage: https://webamp.org/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eternal192@anarchist.nexus 15 points 1 month ago

Winamp revived: nostalgia tickled!

Subscription warning! Go fuck yourself!

[–] WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

This does not whip the Llamas ass.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

I have the feeling the new version's tagline will be something along the lines of

"WINAMP, IT REALLY SUCKS THE LLAMA'S CORPORATE COCK!"

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Will be reborn? If they had actually released Winamp under a real open source licence, it would have been reborn years ago! A bit late for it now!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago

You're bringing back everyone's favourite free pirated mp3 player as a subscription service.. why?

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Last time I heard about a Winamp reboot it was a Bandcamp ripoff with added cryptoslop. While this seems marginally better it's still pretty disappointing.

Deezer seems alright as a streaming service, though, and they're French so there's that.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

More like its corpse will be reanimated in an attempt to scam people using nostalgia. Wouldn't be the first time this trick has been pulled, remember when LimeWire got resurrected to shill a scam cryptocoin?

[–] datavoid@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Foobar2000 it is then

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This is a whole enshitification process right there. After a few months Deezer will start removing content that you will have access to over the winamp subscription, or winamp will pull an Amazon and insert ads into the paid subscription, call it basic subscription, and ask for more money for premium without ads.

Fuck this, I'm fine with my navidrome.

load more comments (5 replies)

foobar2000 and mpv wreck the everloving shit out of it already

[–] Varesti@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

WINAMP! It really licks the llama's ass!!

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 7 points 1 month ago

Loved Winamp. But over the years how many reborn announcements did it have?

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 7 points 1 month ago

No, it won't.

[–] PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Remember when it was reborn to sell NFT?
WACUP for the win

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 58008@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AIMP for life. Sure, it stands on the shoulders of llamas, but it's unbeatable. And it's got a native Linux version now, too!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

WinAmp was already reborn as Wacup though?

https://getwacup.com/

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Wait. Didn’t it already get rebooted?

[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago

Another subscription thing. Sad.

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why would I choose it over VLC?

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Because it really whips the llamas ass!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fleem@piefed.zeromedia.vip 6 points 1 month ago

kodi has visualisations

sorry winamp

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

🏴‍☠️

Fuck Winamp then.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

I just realized it doesn't even need to be reborn to "take on streaming." Y'all with home servers and a big music collection can just start hosting Shoutcasts again and we can use the OG Winamp to stream. :P

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Didn't they try to open source it only to nope out at the last second?

[–] db2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not open source, their shit license didn't even allow for forks or literally anyone else to build it.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they also released code with it that wasn't even theirs to release in the first place...

the whole repo and its history were wiped off github a few months later.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Not before getting cloned dozens of times 🤣

load more comments
view more: next ›