this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2026
648 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31201 readers
2508 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The late night host announced that his interview with the Texas Senate candidate will only air on YouTube

Jimmy Kimmel says that his interview with Democratic Texas Senate candidate James Talarico will not air on TV after President Donald Trump’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) threatened Jimmy Kimmel Live!, ABC, their affiliates, and local stations.

During his Wednesday monologue, Kimmel said that while Talarico would stop by the show for an interview on Thursday, viewers at home won’t be able to watch it on broadcast television. Instead, the interview with the Democratic nominee has been relegated to YouTube.

“Tomorrow night, I’ll be interviewing James Talarico — tomorrow night, under unusual circumstances,” Kimmel began. “You know, for a lot of years, for the whole 20-plus years of our show, in fact, I’ve been interviewing Americans who are running for office with no problem at all, just like Letterman did, Leno did, Arsenio, et cetera, et cetera. I’ve interviewed a lot of political candidates from Hillary Clinton to Ted Cruz to Donald Trump himself.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 222 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

I love how the freedom of speech crowd are the first to deny others th same.

[–] volore@scribe.disroot.org 88 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

nothing scares these christofascist clowns like an actual Christian using Christ's teachings to tell everyone there's nothing Christian about Trump and his ilk, and I am 100% here for it. That's the only way we're ever going to deprogram a large portion of these MAGA morons, whenever this bullshit ends.

[–] protist@retrofed.com 20 points 2 weeks ago

They seem to be incredibly scared of Talarico's message, given this is the second time this has happened to him specifically. They should be scared, because his message is fucking incredible

[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

No wonder they fear and hate Talarico.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

Paradox of Tolerance. Fascists leverage an open society to build political support, then close off the society as soon as they're in power.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They want freedom for their speech, not anyone else’s.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 123 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It will probably get more views on YouTube anyway

[–] jaaake@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

Literally what happened with the same politician being interviewed by Colbert during his primary. FCC told them they couldn't air the interview, they posted it on YouTube, Streisand Effect happens and it's one of the most viewed Colbert videos ever. It won him that election. I think Jasmine Crockett was a better candidate and she may have stood a chance had she gotten that level of exposure.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 73 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Kimmel should’ve called his bluff and done it anyway.

Don’t kowtow to these cowards.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sit there for 20 minutes repeating "Trump wouldn't allow this to be broadcast, here's what to search for on YouTube."

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Every time you obey these fascists in any way, it empowers them. While I appreciate his sensitivity towards the local networks (not so much towards ABC), every time you cave to these shits, it empowers them even more.

He missed an opportunity to create a lot more enemies for this administration. Everyone public figure should be giving a defiant middle finger to them. Trey and Matt did it and they’re billionaires for it.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

While I appreciate his sensitivity towards the local networks (not so much towards ABC), every time you cave to these shits, it empowers them even more.

He missed an opportunity to create a lot more enemies for this administration. Everyone public figure should be giving a defiant middle finger to them. Trey and Matt did it and they’re billionaires for it.

Trey and Matt own South ~~Park~~ America. I'm pretty sure Kimmel doesn't own his Late Show, which is why he has to walk a tightrope

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starik@lemmy.today 26 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Only way is elbows up. Give the bully a bloody nose. It doesn't matter if you lose. He'll think twice next time and you might inspire others to stand up too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alexfire@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They said the Dems would,

Take away first amendment,

Nope it was maga

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kboos1@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago

Lol, look how afraid Dump is

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 33 points 2 weeks ago

Nazi America.

[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

There seem to be some similarities to the Colbert incident. Talarico? They want to censor Talarico's views?

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 14 points 2 weeks ago

He's about to turn Texas purple, I can imagine the pearl clutching

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 29 points 2 weeks ago

I watch it primarily on YouTube anyways so that works for me.

But still, what a fucking insecure rapist loser trump is.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 28 points 2 weeks ago

Literal evidence of chilling free speech. He is self censoring in response to threats of legal consequences by the government. It's the easiest, slam dunk court win on infringing on constitutional rights, but this executive branch and these judges are so extremist that it's still not a guaranteed win. This election really could be the last chance to reclaim some semblance of freedom.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I can’t tell if this is a Talarico/Dem stunt or if the republicans are really that dense and don’t understand the Streisand effect.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The same thing happened earlier this year with Colbert interviewing a political candidate

[–] OtterSec@infosec.pub 20 points 2 weeks ago

The same candidate! It was also Talarico.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know that’s why it’s confusing.

His poll numbers skyrocket after that incident. He got a lot of free publicity as the “candidate republicans fear most”.

And then they decided “fuck it let’s do that again???”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago

or if the republicans are really that dense and don’t understand the Streisand effect.

That's where I'm putting my bet.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

So, they're taping the interview along with the rest of the show's content, but not broadcasting it? Are they going to show dead air in its place? Or maybe a QR code to the interview, along with a countdown timer? I don't think even Jimmy has the balls for that, but it would be awesome.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be kinda awesome to have an image of Jimmy with duct tape over his mouth with a menacing Trump and Carr behind him and then the message to check YouTube for the actual show/interview where they can't be censored by Trump (unless he cries to Google, which he might.)

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

YouTube/Google doesn't have a broadcast license, so can't be harassed in quite the same manner by the FCC. Although Google has a history of premature compliance....

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.social 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Might as well air it. I doubt Trump could shit his britches more than he already does 🚼

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 2 weeks ago

Just put his interview on TV, and openly invite Paxton in for equal time. If he accepts - AWESOME! Interview the shit out of him. If he doesn't, tell the FCC to go fuck themselves, they tried.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 weeks ago

I encourage everyone to go watch it

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The Equal Time Rule would require Kimmel to offer to air an equal-time interview to Ken Paxton as well as Talarico. Unless Kimmel's program is a bona fide news program, which would be exempt from the rule.

Previous administrations adopted a more broad interpretation of "bona fide news program" that included these late night shows that interview guests. Mainly because this rule and the exception are playing with legal fire regarding the first amendment and core political speech.

The Equal Time Rule applies only to over the air broadcasts. YouTube is unregulated on that point.

[–] JohnnyMac@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

From how I understand it, the equal time rules gives opposition 7days to request time. It's not mandatory that the TV station reach out to make it happen.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's ridiculous that they will consider Jimmy Kimmel a news program but then go call Fox News an entertain ment program.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aquovie@lemmy.cafe 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Go ahead and offer it then? Paxton is a coward who won't go near Kimmel. He already won't debate Talarico. His election strategy is to be quiet and unnoticed.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] timochka@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

Can't wait for Vance or Musk to come to Europe to give us another one of their lectures on free speech... Because it's only free speech if it's hate speech, right lads?

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

The Streisand effect again. I’ve never liked Kimmel. He’s not funny, but here I am reading about him again.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›