this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2026
558 points (98.6% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41662 readers
3716 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lagg_mine@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

AI will kill us differently than skynet, its not really the AI, its the capitalism

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

As the nukes come flying in you just shout "is there a seahorse emoji"

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

If Skynet was based on today's "AI" I don't know how it would be the same threat. Like bad, sure. But also reaaaaaly dumb at the same time.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Skynet in the films is pretty dumb. It wastes resources on infiltrators who blend in by looking (and talking) like Arnold Schwarzenegger

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Worked in California.

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Like the current US administration

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

Skynet took on the whole world and more or less won, the us can't beat Iran....

[–] Son_of_Macha@lemmy.cafe 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] andMoonsValue@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Geometric sequences are real, basically exponential.

[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its like exponential, but discrete.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

AI discretion advised.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Squared, cubed... Ya know; geometrically shaped multiplication.

[–] Greystripeycat@lemmy.today 50 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Meh. Leaving out the rest of the date. August 29, 1997. Why does everyone worry about the clankers(sarcasm, just in case you're sensitive) and not about the rich fuckers already controlling everything including those death panels they went on about. I wonder if the clankers would actually be more compassionate than what we have now. I'll be dead within the decade, doubt I'll find out.

[–] zarathustrad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, it's a conflation of threats.

It's not really AI, and it's not what is in control, but it is enabling the increased consolidation of wealth coupled with the increased ability to defend that wealth with a smaller and smaller concentration of people (surveillance+robotics/drones+LLM aided automation). So, real threats, wrong response as usual.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 2 days ago (2 children)

We've had this conversation.

Ten years ago I wrote a blog piece about the notion of computers gaining sentience. One of the problems is we don't actually know how to define or test for sentience (id est, consciousness or self awareness). For most of human history, it was so clear to us whether or not we were engaged with another human being, sentience seemed intuitively obvious.

I get a little into the bushes about qualia (such as the quality of the hue of red rather than it's composition as #FF0000) but even that concept is functionally shallow, and only serves as a way to differentiate human intelligence from non-human intelligence.

We've seen bigots use this kind of notion to argue, say, that Chinese people don't think the same as western folk, or more recently that neurodivergents don't think the same way as normal people.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 23 hours ago

that neurodivergents don’t think the same way as normal people.

Isn't that the definition of neurodivergent?

[–] ThunderLegend@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Bro, last time I saw the word qualia I was reading James Pustejosvky's generative lexicon 15 years ago. Yeah I remember arguing with my professor and leaving my masters degree behind..good (?!) Times.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 73 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except geometric means the exponent is fixed, i.e.

f(x) = x^2

f(x) = x^3

...

f(x) = x^n

where n is a constant, while exponential means the exponent is the variable, like

f(x) = 3^x

[–] TriangleSpecialist@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No. A geometric progression (u_n) with ratio r and first term a satisfies:

For every n, u_n = a × r^n.

Ratio r and first term a are fixed, exponent n varies. The sequence (u_n) does grow (or decrease) exponentially fast.

At least that's what the English definition is, and in my first language as well. If there is one in which "geometric" means "power function", I'd actually be curious to know.

[–] Shindo66@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

Username checks out, this guy maths

[–] meleethecat@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (4 children)

He’s a terminator, not a mathinator.

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thank god he wasn’t a burninator

[–] johncritzman@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Terminator was a man, Or maybe he was a robot-man, Or maybe he was just a robot...

[–] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The question is...is he fully functional?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)

Geometric rate is pretty fast. It doesn't have to be exponential to be scary.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago

Wrong decade bro...

Still hiding today

[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Coincidentally, I happen to be watching families at play through a chain link fence at the moment.

[–] eurodyne@piefed.world 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How this effect was created before computers is crazy. The movement while disintegrating is so good.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I miss practical effects. They are just so much more raw. The highly polished CGI that is everything these days is just visually boring to look at. I am not interested in the next flashy gimmick, anything that you can dream up is now possible to show on screen, so the fast paced stupid action doesn’t hit home at all anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That was 5 minutes ago. I am not dead yet

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›