this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
805 points (99.5% liked)

deflock.me

553 readers
308 users here now

Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your car’s location, date, and time. They also capture your car’s make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points. These cameras collect data on millions of vehicles—regardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. While these systems can be useful for tracking stolen cars or wanted individuals, they are mostly used to track the movements of innocent people.

Learn more at deflock.me

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago
[–] schwim@piefed.zip 122 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's illegal for you to do that because you're not a billionaire.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 40 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

yes, thank you, fuck!

I don't know why people don't seem to get this. It doesn't matter if they are being lawful or not, fascists will shape the laws to achieve their own goals.

The law has always been a tool used by the ruling class to subjugate the working class, it has never been moral. Hell, this isn't even just fascism, its capitalism. Even in Canada, the RCMP were quite literally created to control indigenous people.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Well, it's illegal for billionaires too, but laws only matter when they're enforced.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 91 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Since this was posted he had his house removed from Google Maps

[–] Fredselfish@sh.itjust.works 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Well then think we should make sure to post his address online for all to find easily.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

It is easy to find with an online search. He also has a flock cam in his front yard, because of course he does.

[–] schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works 51 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The irony, of course, is if you want to beat whatever charges they throw at you, you'll also have to be filming yourself the entire time.

The YouTubes are awash with auditors who set up a camera in a public place and have the cops make up all sorts of stories about them to fabricate or threaten an arrest.

Check your state laws about filming private residences, though, that might get squirrely.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 42 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Benn Jordan and Tommy G tried this. It didn't take long before police were called to remove them from the public road next to Flock HQ.

[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

In another video of theirs they listened to a conference they were banned from by catching the wireless mics rf signals from outside the venue. That's pretty bad ass

[–] Zizzy@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 4 days ago

Theyre different than his product because you would have a lot less information and arent able to follow him to his destination.

I seriously believe that unless a guillotine is involved things will continue to just get worse.

[–] nao@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago (2 children)

did he say why they "must compromise"?

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

"Because im making oodles and oodles of money"

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because refusing to allow him to commit crimes would interfere with his ability to make money doing it.

Like, just stop screaming and let it happen, you'll like it, trust me.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How to roll out nation-wide public cameras against the peoples interests?

  1. have a visible and clumsy company (Palantir) distract the public
  2. have a second company (Axon) quietly roll out hidden cameras
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 26 points 4 days ago

Flock CEO must "compromise" on his oxygen consumption.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago

Rapist mindset.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is the thing that I don't get about the legality of this shit. If I set up a camera aimed at my neighbor's driveway and intentionally logged every coming and going of he, his wife, his kids... I could justiably be charged with stalking. But so long as I set up a network of cameras and track my neighbor's every whereabouts with this network and sell access to this data to anyone interested... that's not stalking. That's just good American business.

That is without the added layer of law enforcement involvement, tax dollar support, and absolutely no public say in the matters, etc.

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Or track ones private jets takeoffs and landings

[–] BurgerBaron@quokk.au 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

How dare you not have enough 0's on the end of your bank account balance to do that!

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The history of the US is filled with "nah, capital can do what it wants".

Nothing will change while power is consolidated in the hands of the few.

I do wonder about who works at flock. Surely they have options to resist and sabotage from the inside.

[–] maniclucky@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Given how shit their cybersecurity is, maybe they have been.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I do wonder about who works at flock. Surely they have options to resist and sabotage from the inside.

I have to admit, the fact that their HQ is within commuting distance has crossed my mind.

[–] stochasticity@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is that child in the picture the CEO?

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 3 days ago

Thats Pereter Parker

[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

How about he lead by example, and have a fleet of drones follow him providing a 24/7 publicly available feed.

[–] Mika@piefed.ca 4 points 4 days ago

FPV drones? 👉👈

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The answer is, he is an individual, and Flock cameras are not targeting any one individual, at least not in theory.

Also, I see the argument he's making. The argument is, if it were your child who was kidnapped, would you not want your neighbors to give up some of their privacy in order to turn cameras on every corner toward getting your child home safely? But the problem with that is, Flock cameras are not bringing kidnapped kids home. Neither are Ring doorbells, which are just as bad. What they are doing is making life worse for people of colour and anyone else They want to target. So that's the problem. The parent can't blame their neighbours (particularly their dark-skinned neighbours) for wanting their privacy when a child's safety is on the line, because the Flock cameras are not bringing any children home. That's not what they're for, and pretending they are is bullshit and everybody on both sides knows it. We COULD use all this tech for good. But the people who run it don't want to. They've proven this time and again. So no, they do not get the benefit of the doubt. No, they do not get to take the high road, even hypothetically.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The argument is, if it were your child who was kidnapped......

(note we're on the same page I'm just ranting out loud) Yeah lets take worst case scenarios that dont actually happen in any numbers worth concerning oneself over. if you're worried just design a radio chip for kids arms that will ping cell towers and inject them with that. there your kids are safely trackable.

this not only wouldnt reduce everyone elses privacy and security from the state but would cost less.

[–] cerebralhawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There are shoes where an AirTag (or similar device) can be concealed in the heel so children can be tracked. Apparently it's well embedded and the child doesn't feel it when they walk, and it's difficult to detect/remove.

[–] jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

laugh I was thinking directly about airtags. Coming soon to a kidnapping near you: 'who wants new shoes!'

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure my Yankee friends do not have to compromise whatsoever. Fuck this CEO. I hope you guys guillotine him.

[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Hey, thanks for the support. Being an American these days feels like everyone is against you.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Those outside the USA bitch about us butting in with no understanding of political nuance in their country sure do the same to us.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tbf, I think many of us outsiders understand the nuance of the USA more than the average American understands about other countries', because we are bombarded constantly with your news and actually need to pay attention since the actions of your country affect us greatly.

[–] BeardededSquidward@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I see a lot of people saying that Trump voters and those that voted against him are the same and deserve the same treatment. As well a surprising amount that are blood thirsty and wanting to see us start gunning each other down.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Again, as a counterpoint, I also see similar comments on other countries' oppressive governments too.

It's always, "why aren't they resisting?" Or, "they wouldn't dare try this on me! I've got guns and I'll fight back!"

In the end, we all talk tough on the internet and expect everyone to be as heroic as us we imagine ourselves to be. Just do your best out there, and stay safe.

Thank you and you as well. World is getting more dangerous again.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

It's irresponsible to even write that headline. The reporter knew it was false and had an ethical obligation to do better.

Sigh.

[–] content_educator_94@thelemmy.club 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Beat him with a pillowcase full of oranges

[–] canaryWart@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nah. Potatoes, even apples, or bust

[–] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is a horrific example. It's very legal to do what is described above.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 2 points 4 days ago

Especially because he now has celebrity status

[–] derry@midwest.social 2 points 4 days ago

Punchable face. They always have a face that wants to be punched. Why?

load more comments
view more: next ›