Can we please defeat the god-damned Nazis before we choke on our own infighting‽
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
This is the NY Post - it’s not infighting, it’s a hit piece.
It's reporting on infighting though.
But there isn’t actual infighting. DSA constituents and members aren’t too concerned about any of this, and I’m sure none of this stuff was some big secret. They are concerned with keeping the momentum moving forward. This is the NY Post trying to use their influence to delegitimize the organization by attacking a member in power.
This guys family owning multiple properties isn’t ideal, but it’s not the unforgivable transgression they imply it to be. DSA is getting more national traction and conversation than ever, so publications with interest in stopping that momentum are going to put out pieces like this to try and INCITE infighting.
Good rule of thumb is never read anything NY Post writes. Even if this does bring about or coincide with a resignation/change in leadership, it’s a non-issue.
How dare you make actual sense in this modern age! I'm gonna go stick a fork in the electrical socket in a fit of rage to get back at you!
It would help if a subset of ambitious assholes weren't taking every opportunity to profit off a genuine movement they don't belong in. We need to weed them out early or we're just building another exploitation machine while tearing down the existing one.
I don't think "socialists" should have to be poor, but it is other things in the article that seem more alarming than owning a home. Skipping rent payments, no showing to work for months, lying about being in a union, etc. I don't exactly see what his credentials are for his position in the DSA. All organizations, have a penchant for promoting slimy bros. I hope the DSA become extra vigilant in who they have leading them.
More divisive BS from a MAGAT
“How dare leftists own their own home!”
Downvote for NY Post
This is using weasel numbers for the perspective and value of the home. The house is just the white building pictured in the drone picture from above.
It is worth noting that the cots of living in NYC vastly outpaces most of the rest of the United States. If Mark Zuckerburg can have a $300,000,000 fun boat then it seems pretty shitty to try and burn down an entire movement over a $1,500,000 house. Why doesn't this article reference anyone else's housing prices or give a comparison? 1 citizen owns a boat that is worth 200 houses at this same value (A price I'm supposed to lose my mind over and denote it as inequality) The tone of this article also borders on hateful in word choice and objectivity. Seems really weird to mention white people encroaching in an historic black area as well. Silicon Valley has had no issue since before the 1990's doing that to Oakland
Also worth noting that a good amount of the Women's Sufferage leaders also came from a wealthy background. It doesn't mean they weren't fighting for a greater cause.
Check out how the voice of asceticism dresses while blaming a young activist for living in his parents ordinary house.
