this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2026
1179 points (96.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41537 readers
4101 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FatherPeanut@pawb.social 22 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Okay real talk here, how tf is this Xavier guy basically everywhere? Did he go to meme school?

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 5 points 2 days ago

Does he make up content to react to? Is that his thing?

[–] xav@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago

There are loads of us ! At least two.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pppffffssshhhh.... 5k?!?that is hobby level money. I'm over 15k into just my lenses and I do this as a hobby and shoot friends and family for free.

[–] Larry@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bro... Shooting your friends and family is messed up.... Whether someone pays you to or not...

[–] TrippingBalls@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

I kill people for money.. But you are my friend.. So I will kill you for free

[–] absentbird@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Post a photo so we know you're legit

[–] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] SoloPhoenyx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Free the weenie!

[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 267 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Nobody cares what your camera costs, Nat. You can still take shitty pictures with a $5000 camera. Charge what you think your service is worth and work for clients who pay it.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly.

There is real skill involved in photography, and it takes real time even after being skilled. A 1-hour shoot in a new location still requires probably an hour of planning, maybe an hour or two of logistics, and maybe 2-3 hours of work after the fact to get the photos processed and distributed. And it's basically the opportunity cost that will eat up the entire day, because you can't double book the same sunset or other lighting conditions or whatever. There's seasonality, too, if you want specific seasonal conditions in the shot, if you want to book the Saturday that other clients want, etc.

That's before expenses like insurance, the amortized cost of the software and hardware (including the cameras and lenses and computer), web services for distribution of the files, etc.

It's fair to charge a full day's fair pay for a job like that, and that might mean wanting to charge something like $1000 for an experienced photographer, maybe $500 of which actually represents "profit" for the sole proprietor. But that only happens at that price if there are clients willing to pay that price.

For bigger jobs like parties or weddings, it gets a bit more involved, which is why a 2- or 3-shooter wedding job can cost several thousand, or even above $10k.

But for easy jobs like anything in a high volume studio where the lighting is already known, and there aren't any logistics involved, it should be much cheaper. It just all depends.

[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I did a gig for a while doing Photoshop clean up of wedding images and portraits.

Just that one step can be an exceptional amount of work.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

That's why it's important to set expectations in advance. 50 images shot in the same setting and processed in bulk with maybe minor adjustments to each is something very different from 50 images that you have to touch up every single one.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EggInDisguise@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I've met too many people who think the number they associate to a thing somehow makes them a better user of it.

Tons of people take amazing photos with tons of thought and skill involved in composition and everything, with a phone camera or shitty digital from 2010.

People who use the price of the equipment to justify expense instead of the quality of their work are usually bad at whatever it is they're charging for.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Only 5k? Sound like a hobby, because most professional photographers have a body that is already 5k by itself, plus several lenses ranging between 2 and 20k. I mean, I'm a hobby photographer and my gear already exceeds at least 8k. So stop bitching Karen.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] honesthenery@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

A car is needed for all in the USA. A Camera is not. The uber driver has two jobs while the photographer also has two jobs. My mind is blown. Couples please share your shots so I can take dumps. Maybe you like dumps. It is what it is. Enjoy your slop you little piggies.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (8 children)

the prices they charge and the inability to give me the damn RAWs is why I just got a camera instead.

[–] spudsrus@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Our wedding photographer gave us both RAWs and processed JPEGs

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Asked mine to give it to me RAW and it turned into a huge misunderstanding.

[–] jaschen306@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

Ohhhh this pisses me off soooooo much. I decided to do family photos and specifically asked for the raws before I went into the shoot. They still gave me a hard time after the shoot to get the raws. They gave me a stripped down .dng without any camera settings. Ohhhh that pisses me off so much.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

For the price of one shoot, you can buy someone's lightly used $5,000 kit on ebay. I've had a Canon I bought a decade ago that's still works great. Maybe got it for $250 or so IIRC.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 3 days ago (17 children)

Advertising yourself as:

  1. Bad at internal budgeting

  2. Full of yourself

... is a bold marketing strategy during an economic depression, for a freelance/contract worker.

Best of luck Nat.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (2 children)

… is a bold marketing strategy during an economic depression

Never undersell the possibility that this person is lying.

Or that this is a stock photo and the text is clickbait.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

If people just want the uber price for pictures, hire the uber to pick you up and ask him to take a picture of you with your cellphone. Then you'll have a $12 picture that you can do whatever you want with.

[–] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My education cost 200,000. You think I made all that back in one paycheck? Cry me a river, Natalie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snowdriftissue@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (12 children)

tbf I doubt many Uber drivers actually profit, especially the ones driving $40k cars

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 22 points 2 days ago

Yeah and that Uber driver can't afford rent. Photographers often have less business in the winter, too, and they have a ton of extra equipment to lug around. I know a wedding photographer and it's a lot of work day of and post work to make sure it's all nice.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Looks like a Canon?

Canon RF lenses are outrageously priced, even amongst other outrageous ILC brands, because they lock out third parties. So yeah, this lady got ripped off.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ehh, They're more expensive, but most of them come with IS.

I'd still rather shoot Nikon.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

It's not the IS that makes them expensive, it's the locked out ecosystem and the monopoly they have. I'm not saying they're not good - they are (from what I've seen), but healthy competition, if it existed, would've driven the prices down a bit.

As for IS itself, since the move to IBIS, it makes sense that some lenses drop the IS and only rely on the body's. IMO it used to matter in the DSLR days when IBIS was not really a thing. Nowadays it's sensible to only put it into the longer lenses that physically need it (the longer the lens, the more physical movement required to compensate and so on).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago (21 children)

I shoot with a refurbished $600 Canon EOS Rebel T7. I use two lenses for the majority of my work: an 18-55mm, and a 75-300mm.

Fite me irl, Nat, my shit’s gorgeous and I know it.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If my photographer can get me the picture I need with the $300 camera, I’m hiring them first. Not everyone needs their pictures on a billboard or TV ad.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

When I used to film pornography I got sloppy seconds.

It was the definition of win/win.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›