this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
706 points (98.5% liked)

196

6726 readers
1977 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I'm surprised by how many people took issue with this post. Like, it's specifically funny because some games already make fun of your for picking easy, which is far more mean spirited than making fun of people who are good at games and have nothing to prove. Some people have disabilities that make playing games harder, lack the time to get good because of responsibilities, or just plain aren't good at games. Games shouldn't be making fun of people who already have trouble accessing them, while people who are good at them often need to learn to take themselves less seriously. It's punching down (something that already happens) vs getting proud and successful people to have humility. Games was made for gamers, it's not like they don't want you to play it.

I'm gonna throw this one on my ever growing pile of "posts that people took way more issue with than I expected." The throughline for those posts seem to be that people have a hard time with self deprecating jokes and take anything that pokes fun at themselves seriously. It's a shame, because I'm usually also the target of the jokes that piss people off the most, which is why I get surprised that other people don't also find them funny.

edit: spelling

[–] Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org 3 points 3 days ago

Most definitely was funny and I'd most definitely need a recap/"in the last episode" mode for any story games. Otherwise by the time i can play those again, i have already forgotten where the story was and who was who.

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Idk I through it was funny

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 92 points 5 days ago (4 children)

The thing is this:

The people playing on easy don't get angry when they're called easy-goers, this is not about their ego for them.

But the "I'm the most manly man of them all, I only play on the hardest difficulty!"-types will instantly have their overinflated egos implode when you call them out like that. And you'll have your game shitstormed by incels.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 118 points 5 days ago (3 children)

It's called cultivating a less toxic audience

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 5 days ago (4 children)

also free advertising, having shitheads publish videos of themselves turning red from talking about your game makes the kind of person who frequents 196 go "lmao based let's buy the game out of spite"

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 16 points 4 days ago

Seriously all the chuds bitching about the “girlboss” character they added for the new prequel missions in Halo: Campaign Evolved just highlighted that there were new prequel missions.

(Although actually most of the dipshits I’ve seen complaining about her didn’t actually play so they don’t know that she’s not part of the standard campaign, so they’re saying things like, “The game was already good, they didn’t need to add a new woke character.”)

[–] new_world_odor@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

true shit, their cries have actually led me to some things i wouldn't have found otherwise! like Hazbin Hotel!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

That's why I bought that one game about the trans caterpillar

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 17 points 5 days ago

True true. You definitely get a relaxed fanbase with a good ability to take some irony and self-mockery like that. You just also will always have an army of haters turn up wherever someone expresses personal joy in your game online.

[–] KombatWombat@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

They would be better off not judging people for any selected difficulty then.

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And you'll have your game shitstormed by incels.

Give it a couple of weeks and they'll be distracted by some movie with a woman lead in it, and it will all blow over.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 2 points 3 days ago

True, just cast Lupita Nyong’o in any movie and they'll forget all about the game.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Don't think I'd cater to incels.

[–] TheSlad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Its motivation to prove the game wrong; plow your girlfriend AND play on the hardest difficulty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 46 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like I actually did see things like this in flash games in the early 2000s specifically making fun of 90s tropes.

[–] Enkrod@feddit.org 31 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Flashgames were peak creativity and a very "internet" blend of edginess and woke, there were some absolute treasures out there.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I spent way way too much time on Albino Blacksheep, YTMND, NewGrounds, EbaumsWorld, and so many others as a kid.

[–] jason@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago

Woah. That unlocked some memories....

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 4 days ago

Left 4 Dead had the achievement What Are You Trying to Prove? earned by completing all the campaigns on expert.

L4D2 had Still something to prove, again by beating all the campaigns on expert.

I was able to get the second one by playing Last Man On Earth, which is single-player, but special infected only. The higher difficulties are mostly harder by having common infected do more damage.

[–] gegil@sopuli.xyz 23 points 5 days ago

I recently got into speedruning one of my favourite game. While i did beat that game on hardest difficulty absolutely casually, speedrunning on casual difficulty is so much fun

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, I'd still pick hard. Breezing through games just isn't as fun as having the occasional struggle on the way.

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

depends on the game. some games hard mode is just fighting one enemy for a long ass time over and over again

[–] chunk6235@piefed.social 2 points 3 days ago

And you only have 1/3 as many places to save, so good fucking luck if you die!

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Enemy sponginess is the lazy dev's way of ramping up difficulty. I hate it in FPS especially--oh, this normal enemy just ate 37 bullets, this totally makes sense to the story in a world where guns aren't made of styrofoam.

[–] darthsundhaft@piefed.social 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Are people actually making a big deal about what other people set their difficulty as?

Idk sounds like those people are the ones lacking said social life, not the people minding their business enjoying their game the way they want to.

[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

See Wolfenstein having you as a baby when you pick the lowest difficulty

[–] cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They should have made that mode just have no enemies at all. I would've laughed at that

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The nazis all have clown noses and explode with confetti if you get a hit on it.

[–] blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago

Must have been later games. 3-D only had one death effect per enemy type

Yeah that's even better lol

[–] alapakala@quokk.au 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If that's your kink, sure boss.

If you actual want the respect of your player base, maybe leave shaming culture out the venue? You're one LAN party away from making another jerk circle.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Where's your sense of whimsy, your joie de vivre, your ability to take the piss out of the parts of yourself that can be lightheartedly mocked?

Come onnnn and join the jerk, the planet's on fire, more than half of us are set up to die by systems put in place generations ago, and the government of every country is full of pedos.

Come play a game and if the wellington boot with frog eyes fits you a bit too nicely, dont take it personally, jump in the puddles.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 days ago (4 children)

No game developer is going to try to reduce time playing their game though.

[–] Klear@piefed.world 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They kinda do, in this respect. When huge warning signs didn't work, devs started locking the highest difficulties until you beat the game once or implementing a hidden system that lowers difficulty or sneaks you some goodies if you keep dying too much.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

When huge warning signs didn’t work, devs started locking the highest difficulties until you beat the game once or implementing a hidden system that lowers difficulty or sneaks you some goodies if you keep dying too much.

Adaptive difficulty has been a thing for decades. The first one I remember is Max Payne, released 25 years ago, though I don't remember if it was active on all difficulty settings...

[–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I didn't say it was a recent development, but if anything it has more common over the years.

[–] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I realised that might have been the case as I was hitting "comment" and was like "oh well" - just my first impression was that you meant to imply that it was recent :)

[–] Klear@piefed.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

You never know how old someone is around here. Not long ago I saw someone write something like "maybe they didn't learn about 9/11 at school" and after a quick calculation I was ready to go climb into a grave and stay there =P

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] frog@feddit.uk 11 points 5 days ago

Replay value doesn't really have to do with difficulty. That's what all these mobile game designers found out. They get replayability through a reward system or adding some kind of social aspect to it for peer pressure.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, but people these days are very stupid. AAA game design these days tries to appeal to the lowest common denominator. The C-suite types don't want a player bouncing off their game because the player was too dumb to select the right difficulty type for themselves.

Their solution seems to have been to phase out difficulty selection altogether though. It'd have been more fun if they tried something like this though.

[–] trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 days ago

I think, with modern AAA games, you also run into the problem that they're typically a dozen games in a trenchcoat. So, you might be able to make the shooting gameplay more difficult by just adding more enemies, but you can't easily do that for the platforming parts or the stealth sidequests.

You'd need to build the game three times over, pretty much, to really offer three different difficulty levels.
And so, yeah, they try to avoid that by giving help to players that struggle and optional challenges for players that can handle a higher difficulty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fiona@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago

The thing is: We are not doing that on any other skill-based competitive thing (sports or similar), even though you could largely make the same argument there. Of course any game like this will want to be respectful to its most dedicated players instead of pissing them off.

Honestly, wanting to insult the best players mostly just comes across salty, as if by someone who is annoyed that they are not particularly good (which is fine) and mad about it (which indicates that YOU are the one taking this too seriously). Back in the day playing through the Maw on Legendary in Halo CE was something that was respect if you managed to do it, but nobody really looked down on others for not doing so…

[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Power fantasy simulator

load more comments
view more: next ›