PervPods
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
29 points (96.8% liked)
Apple
1329 readers
101 users here now
There are a couple of community rules in addition to the main instance rules.
All posts must be about Apple
Anything goes as long as it’s about Apple. News about other companies and devices is allowed if it directly relates to Apple.
No NSFW content
While lemmy.zip allows NSFW content this community is intended to be a place for all to feel welcome. Any NSFW content will be removed and the user banned.
If you have any comments or suggestions please message one of the moderators.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
fucking why
To help law enforcement detect potential threats to billionaires
Accessibility for the vision impaired comes to mind. They’ll probably try to sell it as „~~Grok~~ Siri is this true” device.
Please... Apple doesn't care about that and you know it. If anything that'll be in the marketing video.
With all my despise to Apple as a company, accessibility is one (an possibly the only?) area where they actually do more good than bad. Not only their own products are usually doing it quite well (both software and hardware-wise), but they also push the overall accessibility standards up across the industry.
That said... Accessibility is absolutely not the main point of these aiPervertPods. They probably will drive some accessibility features with them, but the main goal is far from it.
AirPods Pro are surprisingly good and affordable hearing aids already (and certified as such in some countries IIRC). Apple does good things sometimes. Of course they’ll use it for marketing because why wouldn’t they.
I get that real hearing aids are expensive, but there's no way in fuck they're actually decent hearing aids. Maybe they can function as the auditory equivalent of drug store reading glasses, but cheapo hearing aids are unpleasant and can make it more difficult to understand speech in many situations.
As someone who's been wearing hearing aids for 20+ years, if you need them, go to an audiologist, and discuss your use cases and needs. Cheaping out will result in hearing aids you're less open to using and learning to use. None are as comfortable as natural hearing, but they aren't just a microphone and selective amplifier anymore.
Wow.
The affordability comes at the cost of relying on an accessibility device that is actively spying on you, and if you're in the US, probably reporting your activities to your insurance company via a data broker. It's the same as Teslas or Ring cameras being used as an accessibility device.
I take it you don’t own a phone.
I own a GrapheneOS phone.
Did you remove all the radios from it?
Yes, cause hearing aids are big business. They're really trying to corner the hearing aid market with this...
You might not care about accessibility. I do and will praise Apple for making a good use of their audio engineering expertise.
I do care, but there are devices out there better suited for it, that don't have privacy issues, and will ultimately work better in the long run... Like a dog. And you'd trust grampa with these running on apple AI/maps?
I want my phone to have a microphone so that I can do voice calls and that means there are multiple parties that could be spying on me. No reason to single out the microphone in my headphones.
There's a huge difference between a microphone, and microphone+camera. And just like metas pervert glasses, there's no need for this. Your convenience doesn't mean anything to my rights. Just because you're not worried about it, doesn't mean I should have to deal with it.
I very much doubt cameras embedded into tiny headphones have quality/resolution that’s suited for being an equivalent of pervert glasses but we’ll see how it works when it’s presented.
I don’t know if they’ll be shipping it due to the current pushback on cameras but I think there’s been a number of patents and discussion about on-device processing of low resolution photos for example to assist with navigation or helping visually impaired.