this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2026
29 points (96.8% liked)

Apple

1348 readers
4 users here now

There are a couple of community rules in addition to the main instance rules.

All posts must be about Apple

Anything goes as long as it’s about Apple. News about other companies and devices is allowed if it directly relates to Apple.

No NSFW content

While lemmy.zip allows NSFW content this community is intended to be a place for all to feel welcome. Any NSFW content will be removed and the user banned.

If you have any comments or suggestions please message one of the moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] misk@piefed.social -2 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

AirPods Pro are surprisingly good and affordable hearing aids already (and certified as such in some countries IIRC). Apple does good things sometimes. Of course they’ll use it for marketing because why wouldn’t they.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I get that real hearing aids are expensive, but there's no way in fuck they're actually decent hearing aids. Maybe they can function as the auditory equivalent of drug store reading glasses, but cheapo hearing aids are unpleasant and can make it more difficult to understand speech in many situations.

As someone who's been wearing hearing aids for 20+ years, if you need them, go to an audiologist, and discuss your use cases and needs. Cheaping out will result in hearing aids you're less open to using and learning to use. None are as comfortable as natural hearing, but they aren't just a microphone and selective amplifier anymore.

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The affordability comes at the cost of relying on an accessibility device that is actively spying on you, and if you're in the US, probably reporting your activities to your insurance company via a data broker. It's the same as Teslas or Ring cameras being used as an accessibility device.

[–] misk@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I take it you don’t own a phone.

[–] orvorn@slrpnk.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] misk@piefed.social -1 points 2 weeks ago

Did you remove all the radios from it?

[–] shartgargle@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, cause hearing aids are big business. They're really trying to corner the hearing aid market with this...

[–] misk@piefed.social 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You might not care about accessibility. I do and will praise Apple for making a good use of their audio engineering expertise.

https://support.apple.com/en-us/120992

[–] shartgargle@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I do care, but there are devices out there better suited for it, that don't have privacy issues, and will ultimately work better in the long run... Like a dog. And you'd trust grampa with these running on apple AI/maps?

[–] misk@piefed.social -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I want my phone to have a microphone so that I can do voice calls and that means there are multiple parties that could be spying on me. No reason to single out the microphone in my headphones.

[–] shartgargle@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a huge difference between a microphone, and microphone+camera. And just like metas pervert glasses, there's no need for this. Your convenience doesn't mean anything to my rights. Just because you're not worried about it, doesn't mean I should have to deal with it.

[–] misk@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

I very much doubt cameras embedded into tiny headphones have quality/resolution that’s suited for being an equivalent of pervert glasses but we’ll see how it works when it’s presented.