this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2026
619 points (98.9% liked)

AntiTrumpAlliance

1807 readers
355 users here now

About

An alliance among all who oppose Donald Trump's actions, positions, cabinet, supporters, policies, or motives. This alliance includes anyone from the left or the right; anyone from any religion or lack thereof; anyone from any country or state; any man, woman or child.

Rules

-No pro-Trump posts or comments

-No off topic posts

-Be civil

-No trolling

-Follow Lemmy terms of service

Social Media

Discord

Reddit

Other Communities

!desantisthreatensusa@lemmy.world

!antifascism@midwest.social

!politicus@kbin.social

founded 2 years ago
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 52 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

For decades, laws have always taken a few years to kick in. Trump isn't the Republican first to take credit for a Democrat president policy.

Oh and half the time these laws don't actually need to take that long to kick in. Many could be instant, but just aren't for no reason.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Republicans also famously break things on their way out so they can blame the consequences on their successors. Like how trump committed the US military to pulling out of Afghanistan with no plan in place.

[–] jason@discuss.online 9 points 2 weeks ago

Or Trump's first round of tax cuts (for normal people) expired in 2025.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A lot of laws require time to get things set up. Usually the delay is to allow all parties to get ready for the law to take full effect or even to allow some time for the legal system to iron out any potential kinks.

I'd much rather have laws take a little time to come into full effect than whiplash of a law changing in flight. Just look at the tariffs as an example of the mess that can cause.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

That why I said half the time. There are many laws that don't require set, but still take time because fuck the American people.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like the Japanese system if one is going to have a for profit medical system. That is all products and services have a capped profit and hospitals must list prices.. way better than the game of insurance companies hiking up prices so your copay is the same price as the original item or treatment.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or just a do standardized profit margin max and min law for everything except luxury items?

Honestly, capitalism can work if we take the capital centric laws out

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

What's to be gained by having hospitals privately owned at all? It's not like they're competing over price or service... They're just monopolies all the way down the supply chain.

Regulating private health care is polishing a turd.

We didn't miss a huge opportunity to make private firefighting work, or new advances in fire suppression. We just missed out on a bunch of pointless house fires. Today that's every sick or dead person who could be doing things instead.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just wait til January. That's when the majority of the One Big Buttfucked Bill passed last summer takes effect.

The Republicans decimated healthcare across the board, diverting over a trillion dollars from Medicaid and ACA alone, but that's not actually the worst of it.

We don't know the worst of it yet because we haven't seen the worst of it yet.

Anticipating the usual midterm majority party switch, the Republicans made sure the biggest hits wouldn't take effect until after November 2026 -- the midterms -- so they could blame the Democrats.

They literally have this steal credit/deflect blame schtick baked into their SOP now.

[–] Screamium@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So we should spread the word far and wide now, before the midterms

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yup. I'm doing what I can.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I thought it was going to be a reduction close to 600%

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

After the first 100% they're reimbursing you for all those years of theft.