this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
402 points (95.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

41720 readers
2738 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 63 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

lol holy fuck I hope no one takes this seriously, because Vietnam was fucking hell for the soldiers. No one thought it was awesome except some conservative Nixon supporting fucks who didn't care because they didn't have their 16 year old get drafted.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 61 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I hope no one takes this seriously

Neither do I, that's why I posted it here

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

noncredibledefense would eat this up

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 23 points 3 weeks ago

Feel free to post it there

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 42 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)
[–] FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago

Lemmy has got to be the only place where people use reaction academic papers rather than reaction gifs. But i love that. Thanks for sharing

[–] hyphen0175@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

There’s a lot of interesting idea in this paper, presented in a very strange way. The main idea is that drone warfare takes a lot of the masculinity (for example, courage in the face of death) out of warfare, and masculinity can be seen as one of the main concepts that drive war. The act of killing is no longer masculine in this context (like the meme shows) and this poses a big problem for the military. The paper takes a strange direction and implies that because it can’t be masculine, it might be queer (gay), and further that this queerness could be a positive opportunity for changing the discourse about war. It’s a cool idea that talking about drone warfare’s emasculation could change people’s minds about war, but the way that they used queerness as a concept to get there reads so bizarrely.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I've had conversations with people who think that Medieval warfare was more honorable and better because of the hand to hand nature of it, and that guns ruined how badass it was.

It also draws to mind the inventor of the machine gun Hiram Maxim's idea that the machine gun would be so terrible that people would stop having wars.

The reality is that war has always been the worst thing that can happen, and most people die of disease and indiscriminate weapons like artillery.

It seems the strategy of making hell more hellish to stop the hell is a poor one.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I do think warfare is more honorable and better the less technology you use, but that’s just because technology lets you increase the distance of warfare and the distance is what actually makes wars worse or less honorable.

I would not have said better without the prompt of your comment, but I value the deadliness of war negatively, so something like a club can kill fewer people than a gun, which can kill fewer people than a neutron bomb.

I think it’s more honorable to give all parties involved an honest chance in winning a fight and in harming the other side. Drone operators are functionally immune to harm, and their side only risks the value of a drone, whereas the other side is often unarmed and fully vulnerable to drone attacks, just by sleeping near a window or being outside [or going to a wedding, but that’s not my point]. It’s a lot harder to hit someone with a club without being vulnerable to their attacks yourself, and you cast an even wider net of damage with similarly low risk of the people actually impacted by your neutron bomb being able to attack you back.

A good historical example for how this is not dependent just on technology and for why medieval warfare was NOT more honorable is the Siege of Caffa. The Golden Horde flung plague-ridden corpses over the city walls, infecting the residents, causing them to flee, and likely causing the Black Death. That again, involves an increased distance of warfare. Any time you fight in a way that can’t be reversed, it’s less honorable and deadlier, thereby making it worse from my perspective.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I was so taken out of it, I thought they may have just been using queer in the context of irregularity but then they hit me with "drones could give people gender anxiety" and I didn't know where I was anymore lol

It's almost an interesting train of thought, but war isn't inherently masculine, and I think it's a pretty undeserving concept once you consider external factors that drive people to conflict. This feels like it views masculinity solely through the lens of what is more accurately described as toxic masculinity, where the image of maleness is based in some combatitive quantity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

wtf did i just read. lmao. this gotta be some ragebait paper.

I show how descriptions of drone warfare are rife with symptoms of an unresolved disorientation, often expressed as gender anxiety over the failure of the distance–intimacy and home–combat axes to orient killing with drones.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I do think its funny that people think the drone war future is one in which humans aren't getting killed instead of where where humans can't even fight back.

Go watch ANY footage of the war in Ukraine and think about swarms of those drones working their way down your street, because that is what it looks like.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

Soldiers are not getting killed. Innocent people don't count.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_13te@feddit.org 20 points 3 weeks ago

"Primary weapon: python script" got me lmao

[–] OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Everyone also had fun too!

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Hubi@feddit.org 12 points 3 weeks ago

The commercialization is what took out all the fun. You used to go to war over physical things like land or treasure, then it was ideology and now it's just so the green line goes up. Lame af.

[–] wdx@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago

I get the feeling someone had a frustrating day at work due to Kubernetes

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Didn't some country try to develop a chemical agent that would turn the enemy gay? 🤔

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

This can easily be ~~neglected~~ negated with a squadron of gay soldiers, just saying. You can even code-name them "the spartans."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I don't like them putting a bunch of chemicals into the water that turn the freaking frogs gay. Do you understand that?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah yes, notorious woke libtards “Lockheed Martin”

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] LORDSMEGMA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember a post from way back was a picture of someone's legs on their desk, wearing Lockheed Martin branded trans flag thigh socls

[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those are coveted by the noncredibledefense crowd. You can get copies on AliExpress, but they just aren't the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kersploosh@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Didn't you hear? Lockheed is "extremely woke" according to the right-wing culture warriors:

https://buywokefree.com/brand-profile/lockheed-martin

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've heard of rainbow capitalism but I haven't heard of rainbow warfare 😆

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] w3ird_sloth@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The 'Fortunate Sons' are the rich ones with connections who didn't have to go to war. They got it backwards.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah but the song is about someone who is NOT a fortunate son. Or a senator's son.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Anyone who thinks America were the good guys in Vietnam is full on fucking stupid.

America who faked an attack on themselves (Gulf of Tonkin incident) to get into a war, start loosing and so used chemical weapons and random attacks on women and children. Then continuing to lose Richard Nixon decided to extend the war crimes and deaths several years in order to run an illegal and undeclared war against Laos and Cambodia - allowing Pol Pot and the Kymer Rouge to get into power off the millitarism and anti-American sentiment the wars created.

Eventually when the American media and students got angry enough and the war dead and massive extent of war crimes, and illegal actions of Nixon got too much, America finally decided to accept their losses and just leave. Leaving Pol Pot to commit his own extremist crimes against humanity.

Ultimately Vietnam had to then go to war with their neighbors in order to stop Pol Pot's war cimes and genocides. Vietnam cleaned up America's mess.

All because America was afraid of Socialism.

The fucking "good guys", spraying agent orange and napalm on children.

[–] 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Okay but guns = cool and drones = gay

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Welcome to shitposting, I guess...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 10 points 3 weeks ago

kubectl delete enemy --all made me fucking snort.

[–] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, like "war was fun before" Sure kido.

[–] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I think u overlooked what community this was posted in lol

[–] alexquiniou@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, you are right. 😋 That still boil my blood. I hear this type of viewpoint everyday.

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do you want "Warhammer 40000: in the grim darkness of the future there is only war"?

Because that is how you get "Warhammer 40000: in the grim darkness of the future there is only war".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago

The war version of Zizek's "my chatbot fucks your chatbot, we get sex out of the way and we can discuss philosophy".

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 5 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

[off topic?]

https://www.gutenberg.org/files/74098/74098-h/74098-h.htm

War No. 81-Q by Cordwainer Smith

The USA and Tibet go to war in the 22nd Century...

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ew new wars are so ugly 🤮 Give us the ol' good trench war!

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

*sips sugar free monster*

Look alive, zoomies. It's time for another trench charge.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
[–] wieson@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, cosacks riding in with their war falcons, raining down birds of fire onto a nuclear power is way cooler than lukewarm and wet amithumbs getting stuck in the jungle.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Nothing gets the murder juices flowing like being forced into a hot, humid environment you never thought about until getting drafted.

load more comments
view more: next ›