this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2026
949 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

21009 readers
1251 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 153 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Vultures have been shown to reduce the spread of dangerous infectious diseases at scale.

4 paragraph quote

From this perspective, each vulture species features peculiar skin microbiota compositions, likely involved in singular protective mechanisms of which characterization is yet highly desirable, acknowledging the potential implications under diverse applicative fields. Altogether, state-of-the-art knowledge pinpoints that the cutaneous microbiota constitutes a barrier of microbial, physical, chemical, and immunological nature for the skin [25]. Skin microorganisms represent the first physical barrier against exogenous microorganisms of environmental origin [25]. Here, pioneering microbial specimens promote physical hindrance against the secondary colonization of pathogenic specimens, aside from establishing direct connections with the host, aimed at regulating the differentiation process of keratinocytes [26]. By employing various mechanisms of resistance to colonization, such as competition for nutritional resources, direct inhibition, and/or interference with environmental survival [25], cutaneous microbiota enable, de facto, a microbial barrier that protects from the myriads of pathogenic microorganisms encountered in necrophagic activities [4]. Intriguingly, health-promoting strains of the Staphylococcus genera adopt fine mechanisms to antagonize pathogenic strains of the same genera (e.g., quorum sensing, antibiotic production, etc.) [27,28,29].

....

Vultures contribute significantly to maintaining ecosystem homeostasis. Part of their food intake is released as nutrients through their feces, promoting a cycle of nutrients that supports a healthy ecosystem [90]. From this perspective, efforts in the characterization of the fecal microbiota would elucidate the ecological service necrophagic birds provide to other animal species. Furthermore, vultures have been recognized for their public health benefits, primarily because they can efficiently dispose of vast quantities of inadequately managed carcasses, thereby maintaining adequate levels of hygiene in the ecosystem [5].

The pivotal role of the vultures’ unique ability to contain pathogens is attributed to the microbiota associated with the different anatomical districts of their bodies, with the cutaneous microbiota as the main actor [4]. Unlike other animals, vulture skin microbiota is the most populated in terms of microbial abundance and biodiversity. This is likely due to dietary style, since carcasses carry diverse and more specialized microbial communities, interfering with skin microbial development. It can be hypothesized that the taxa identified derive from the dead animal body, such as Methanobrevibacter smithii present in the intestinal district of the dead animals, or from environmental sources like, for example, Xanthomonas spp. and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae [4].

Genes identified in the facial region include elements correlated with putrescine [47], one of the main molecules produced in a decomposing carcass, confirming the influence that the carcass microbiota has on the assembly of the host’s microbiota. Further support for this hypothesis comes from the extensive functional diversity observed in microorganisms residing in the facial region. It has been observed that these range from producers of antimicrobials to normal intestinal bacteria and bacteria linked to plants and soil [4], agreeing that there is a significant influence from the environment and carcass on the composition of the facial microbiota. In this regard, determining the carcass microbiota would be necessary for further evaluation of this hypothesis.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12029367/

[–] rockerface@lemmy.cafe 110 points 2 weeks ago

The cleanup crew doesn't fuck around

[–] arandomthought@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I like that account name. It's not "nature friends" or "interesting nature facts" it tells you to please "GIVE A SHIT about Nature" or fuck off.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And yet they have the mark of shame

[–] Carrot@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

Could be before it cost money?

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

that would kill almost anything else

Guess what: It's fact check time!!

Anthrax: ❌

Most birds are naturally resistant to anthrax because of their higher body temperature.

Botulism (actually botox, botulism is the illness caused by botox. You can't quite eat an illness): ✅

"Botulism is one of the most toxic substances in the world, and [turkey vultures'] guts are filled with this bacteria, which apparently has no effect on them," says Graves.

(Yes, the article made the same mistake)

Rabies: ❌

All warm-blooded species, including humans, may become infected with the rabies virus. Birds were first artificially infected with rabies in 1884; however, infected birds are largely, if not wholly, asymptomatic, and recover.

Cholera (actually avian cholera, which is distinct from "normal" cholera): ❓

Besides chickens, the disease also concerns turkeys, ducks, geese, raptors, and canaries.

So 2/4 diseases are already irrelevant for birds but they sound scary because they infect humans. But:

Avian cholera barely even counts because it's caused by "Pasteurella multocida" while (human) cholera is caused by "Vibrio cholerae". The two bacteria are genetically as closely related as humans and mammoths. And avian cholera does not kill anything but birds.

--

This isn't to degrade the vulture's ability to withstand pathogens and toxins, that is still very impressive. It's just that obviously birds are immune to most human diseases, as pathogens don't tend to easily jump between distant species.

And even if they DO jump between species, they usually do not bring their "deadliness" with them (unless they produce poison like botox) as different species react completely differently. Maybe rabies is the one exception, as adjusting the behavior of your host by rummaging around in the brain has some universally negative side effects.

[–] kingofthesheep@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Just wanted to note that botox is actually just a shortening of botulinum toxin. The organism that produces it is Clostridium botulinum.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

ok so they still carry it so it can infect and spread

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 33 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Now if only we could bioengineer our own stomachs to be that powerful

[–] Barley_Man@sopuli.xyz 70 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

There are sure to be tradeoffs which would explain why not every animal have evolved similar stomachs. It's probably expensive energy wise to maintain that acidity. It probably also makes it hard to maintain a healthy gut flora. Also imagine the burn if you vomit up stomach acid with pH 1.0

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 40 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Also imagine the burn if you vomit up stomach acid with pH 1.0

Instant free ranged weapon!

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Betcher’s Gland was present in the Primarchs, we’re looking at around 28,000 years.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 16 points 2 weeks ago

Much more achievable for the common man

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago
[–] RogueBanana@piefed.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Me suddenly feeling nauseous when a cop walks by

[–] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but they can projectile vomit as a defense mechanism. Imagine the possibilities.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 2 weeks ago

probably has a very thick mucus layer, plus a robust stomach to withstand the low ph.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In the game Mass Effect, the Krogan race has all these "backup" organs. They pretty much evolved to become incredibly resilient.

But they also become alpha douches.

Either way, I love those little guys.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Krogans were heavily inspired by Klingons.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] stardustpathsofglory@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the Sky burial done in Tibet. I guess this way you have also less diseases.

[–] SlurryBravo@infosec.pub 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sadly, due to a certain drug in dead livestock is causing death in vultures the practice has started to have issues. This was a great podcast about the practice and issue: https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/579-towers-of-silence/

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Diclofenac. It is now banned for veterinary use in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. But vulture populations will take decades to recover. Sadly, diclofenac is still used in Spain and some other European countries, and can impact local vulture species.

Sky burial is fine as humans do not eat that much diclofenac anyway, but just to be safe they are banned in China (but not in India or Nepal) for the bodies of people who died of infectious diseases.

[–] cristigyk@piefed.social 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

so you're saying vultures are basically flying garbage bins?

[–] ZJBlank@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Compost bins, but yes

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

That’s bin chickens.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 2 weeks ago

the pic on the lef tis a beared vulture, lammageir, its stomach acid is has unusually lower ph(high acidity) compared to other vultures, because its bones. the acid also destroys bacteria, parasites and viruses , mostly.

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a neat Turkey vulture that likes to hang out on the roof of my garage. The neighbors have a wide open field behind my house. I'm pretty sure he lives nearby.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

You should get checked out by your doctor, maybe he knows something you dont.

[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Can't we identify the genes responsible for their stomach formation and CRISPR them unto humans, theoretically giving them the same abilities?

[–] Promethiel@lemmy.world 50 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Can't we identify the genes responsible for their stomach formation

Absolutely.

and CRISPR them unto humans, theoretically giving them the same abilities?

Absolutely not.

CRISPR and related techniques are not magic. The interplay between gene presence and trait expression is absurdly more complicated than that. You cannot simply "edit in" entire biological adaptations, that's not how it works.

The most likely scenario in such an attempt would simply be nothing. Other possibilities include: Autoimmune lifelong digestive system issues, and death, amongst many others.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

To add on to this, vultures stomach acid pH ranges between 0 and 1.

So unless you're also modifying the stomach and gut tissue to be able to withstand hydrochloric acid I'm pretty sure that (if successful, which is a big if) that person just dies.

[–] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, our stomach acid is hydrocloric acid. Just ours isn't nearly as concentrated.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 weeks ago

Considerably less so, but yes I should have specified the concentration

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Vulture pH is closer to 0.2, ours is closer to 2.

it's 10x more acidic than ours, so yeah, we would need to probably refine the entire digestive system

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago

~100x it's a logarithmic scale

[–] Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Biggest hurdle to just experiment by randomly crispr-editing in humans are ethical, as a society the majority does not want a repeat of experiments similar to Mengeles twins.

Even though I would love to edit myself to be able to digest lignin and cellulose

[–] Promethiel@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ethics are a big hurdle, but I wouldn't call it the biggest. Mengele was a conscienceless monster who played at pseudo science.

The biggest hurdle to gene editing is that it's fucking hard. Even Mengele V2.0 with no morals and a stable of daily test subjects wouldn't lead to a 'mastery' that lets you merely select for your changes to only include digesting lignin and cellulose.

Seriously. It's really hard to even model within acceptable error margins, what the results of gene therapy will be. The potential for disastrous results also only goes up the more complex the interactions you're trying to affect.

At current time, even some of the best recorded attempts which are decidedly positively quality of life altering (e.g. [emphasis mine] https://www.science.org/content/article/gene-editing-therapy-made-just-6-months-helps-baby-life-threatening-disease) still come with great caveats:

The boy, first treated in February at just 7 months old, still needs a special diet and medication; the experimental therapy alone isn’t enough to prevent a dangerous buildup of ammonia in his blood caused by a faulty gene for a key liver enzyme. Still, the swift development of a gene editor that appears to have repaired the defect in some of his liver cells is a landmark demonstration of a personalized approach that has tantalized rare disease researchers.

Meanwhile, even renowned institutions starting from best intentions, get it horribly wrong, because the interactions are just that hard to model (e.g. [emphasis mine] https://www.science.org/content/article/exclusive-death-girl-chinese-gene-editing-trial-was-never-made-public):

That vague language glossed over tragedy: Seven days after the girl’s medical team infused trillions of viruses carrying the recipe for the base editor into her spinal fluid, she died of a severe immune reaction linked to the therapy, Science and Retraction Watch can now reveal.

In a possible future, itself perhaps locked in to some other timeline, your dreams may be possible for your grandchildren and great-grandchildren. But today, they're just as likely to get you dead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

when you can digest cellulose but you lose 90% of your daily fiber and get colon cancer

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mdalin@infosec.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How insanely toxic is their poop though? 🫪

[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Well, if it chemically destroys the pathogens, not very.

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They squirt shit on their feet like hand sanitizer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 4 points 2 weeks ago

Vultures are metal af.

[–] xep@discuss.online 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Our stomach acidity is pretty low too.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Looking it up I just read that our gastric acid is produced at PH 0.8

It's immediately increased to PH 1.5 by the other gastric juices, then is increased more as it is used to digest

People who eat one or two meals a day probably have very acidic stomach acid at each meal; those who snack constantly or eat 5 meals a day probably never see strong stomach acid except maybe at breakfast

[–] CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A vulture has gastric acid with a pH of approximately 1. Which is equivalent to 100% pure hydrochloric acid.

The acidic component of a human's gastric acid is hydrochloric acid. The overall pH of our gastric acid is between 1 and 3, which is similar to carrion eating carnivores and lower than most mammals.

However, the secretion of acid in the stomach (in humans) is tightly regulated by the body, with acid being secreted during digestion and then neutralized after the fact.

So, someone who eats a lot will have gastric juices with a more consistently low pH. Unless you just really like chowing down on baking soda and lye, in which case, why?

Wikipedia: Gastric Acid

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Funny. The thing I found said the stomach acid was strongest in a fasted state, I didn't read its reference for that state, 'cause I don't usually bother reading too deeply on what amounts to a "humans are pretty remarkable" comment.

Incidentally I don't like Wikipedia on anything diet or digestion related as they are not allowed to reference primary research, and what makes it to newspapers is the information with money behind it. I don't want Coca-Cola and Unilever's take on human health.

[–] Omnipitaph@reddthat.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

I've always wondered about this. The bacteria itself isn't usually the problem, its the compounds they shit out right? So like, are their livers just beastly? How are they metabolizing all those crazy nerve agents?

load more comments
view more: next ›