Sooooo not anti-pervert and a generic publicity stunt. Haha please laugh etc. Don't have anything against DDG but can only roll my eyes at something like this
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2026
273 points (95.0% liked)
Technology
87446 readers
3427 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean, I'm not gonna buy them, but I still enjoy the dad joke.
Sometimes corny is fun
Right. Anti-pervert glasses would at least require some lasers to meet the requisite qualifications.
You can hide your eyes with the anti light version of the anti pervert glasses!
load more comments
(1 replies)
I have only read the title but this just seems like.. Normal glasses then?
Yep. Just normal, AliBaba sunglasses.
Probably more expensive than AliBaba. Which might or might not mean better quality.
I think it was like $25
Edit: $35
load more comments
(2 replies)
Yeah... I think "anti pervert glasses" is a stretch for normal glasses. If anything, it makes you accidentally look like a pervert using pervert glasses to spy on people.
So it’s not anti-pervert then. It’s just non-pervert.
Anti-pervert would be something like sunglasses that zap the pervert sunglasses' cameras with lasers and damage the sensor. Maybe they don’t have to be so accurate.
There are infrared reflecting glasses that blind cameras.
Does this work for flock cameras?
Not sure. I assume they have a better IR filter than the small cameras used for the pervert glasses.
Although they may be IR sensitive because they also need to work at night though. Would need to see the technical specs.
Maybe a sort of anti pervert mesh network where gamma radiation is fired in the direction of whoever wears pervert glasses and eventually kills them with cancer.
It’s incredibly irresponsible and would have unintended consequences for otherwise innocent people but it would technically work so capitalism says ship it before China does!
The real move would be to include polarized lenses or a holographic coating to block infrared facial ID cameras like Flock. Because most sunglasses don’t block the infrared spectrum, meaning something like a Flock camera can see right through them.
These are basically just a dad joke, based on the fact that meta has made every other pair of sunglasses “anti-pervert sunglasses” by default.
Yeah, well said. I wish someone would sell and manufacture actual anti surveillance glasses
“No camera, no microphone, no AI, no battery, no electronics of any kind,” Knockaround boasts on its website. “Just a beautifully crafted pair of matte black sunglasses with a glossy DuckDuckGo logo, designed to block the sun and never send data to the cloud
I wish DDG defaulted to their no ai search.
If they want to make silly little jokes about “the other guys and their ai” then maybe don’t use ai shit as your default search option on your own platform?
$39 is probably still a huge markup.
They're barely making back the research costs of producing sunglasses without a lithium-polymer battery or a 12 megapixel CMOS camera.
THE ABOVE COMMENT IS SARCASM.there's no extra markup involved here for what is essentially a marketing thing.
they're $35. which is also the price the 'normal' (not 'collab' edition) ones sell for direct on ka's web site or at retailers like rei.
Meanwhile, I recently got new prescription glasses (after wearing my previous pairs for way too long, BTW) and got some that have an IR-blocking coating that's supposed to block face recognition cameras. Because that apparently needs to be a thing these days.
(I'm disappointed that these DuckDuckGo glasses don't have a similar special coating. I like the company I got mine from, but I'd like to see more companies offering privacy-enhancing tech.)
What, no company names to help out a fella?
I didn't want to give the appearance of shilling. But if you want to know, it's https://www.zennioptical.com/id-guard
There are apparently also similar products from "Reflectacles" and "Vaydr," but they were more expensive and/or not normal prescription glasses. The Zenni thing is just an extra coating you can add on to the glasses you would have otherwise bought anyway (which is how I found out about it; I didn't know it existed beforehand).
Thanks! It’s wild that this is a thing now. It’s like we’re living in a cyberpunk dystopia!
Is this now not not not the onion?
Sold out and I can't seem to pre-order a pair for their next batch (maybe the next allotment is already sold out).
Oh well, my wallet wins this round.
I will let you know when they're available again 😈
Ironically actual meta
"2. Only tech related news or articles."
While the headline doesn't discuss it, the article begins with "Meta has opened Pandora’s box with its AI-infused smart sunglasses. The pricy accessory has sparked a heated debate over privacy, with unsavory individuals abusing the eyewear’s easily-missed cameras to harass unsuspecting strangers in public — garnering the specs the distinctly unflattering nickname of “pervert glasses.”"
load more comments
(4 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
...but does it have electrolytes?
Brawdo's got what plants crave.
Is DuckDuckGo going down the DBrand/Wendy's model of irreverent, self aware marketing? I'm pretty tired of it being honest. Also, are they actually trying to make money from this? A satirical social media post would get the point across. But they're actually selling these for some reason.
Some company just placed DDG logo on existing model of glasses and is selling them for exact same price as a joke. It's not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.
You make it sound like DDG aren't involved at all. They very much are.
It’s not like DDG started manufacturing glasses specifically for this joke.
No, it's like DDG started selling glasses specifically for this joke.
The reason is probably to garner as much brand awareness as possible bc the goal of marketing isn't to just get a point across. If a company like DDG can gain a good amount of brand awareness by advertising and selling some relatively inexpensive sunglasses with the company logo on it then I personally see it as a net positive.
Glasses without electronics? Then how will I see!?!
view more: next ›