this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2026
121 points (94.8% liked)

Movies

14102 readers
50 users here now

Lemmy

Welcome to Movies, a community for discussing movies, film news, box office, and more! We want this to be a place for members to feel safe to discuss and share everything they love about movies and movie related things. Please feel free to take part and help our community grow!


Related Communities:

!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.

!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.

!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.


While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/

  1. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed

  4. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.

    Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.

    Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.

Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QueenHawlSera@piefed.social 27 points 1 month ago (10 children)

Fuck the chuds who thought it'd flop because of Elliot Page and a black Helen of Troy.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 15 points 1 month ago (7 children)

right wingers have always got thier panties in a wad over ELLIOT page because he transitioned.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

it was more because he's supposed to be a super soldier and he weighs 96 lbs.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

A fully accurate movie about ancient Greece would have a lot MORE queer stuff

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Critical Drinker got this one completely wrong.

[–] Ilandar@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It doesn't matter, he already made his money from the faux outrage he and other right wing grifters successfully generated. Whether his predictions are accurate is irrelevant because he doesn't have a reputation as a real film critic to uphold and the social media debate cycle is so fast nowadays that he can immediately pivot to a new "controversy" and start milking that.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Didn't they say it would make lots of money because it is a Christopher Nolan movie.

[–] MML@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

It'll do fine, it still won't make it a good movie (nothing to do with that) it'll be a typical Hollywood pander film, big visuals, little substance. Oppenheimer was praised for being a mediocre piece of crap.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This benchmark comes with a caveat because ticket sales weren’t adjusted for inflation.

You know, you're the journalist writing the article. You could have just done that math for us instead of writing the parenthetical caveat

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

He's a journalist, not mathematician! :)

[–] agelord@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most likely written by AI. LLMs love to write "caveat"

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

One caveat there - so do I.

[–] fisch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I liked it, but I found it visually disappointing. No gods except Athena, Sirens boring, Hades boring, Circe boring (except the transformation scene, that was sick).

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (4 children)

My brother just said I should go see it, and said almost everything was practical, even the cyclops

[–] SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I highly doubt that. I haven't seen it yet but Nolan uses vfx in all his films. As he should, people who think "CGI always sucks" never know how much CGI is used that they don't see.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

even the cyclops

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

And yet, $250 million budget for practical effects. Could have saved money on CGI, which is a bonkers thing to say.

Unless the movie is Star Wars or Avengers: Endgame or Avatar, nobody should be spending a quarter of a billion dollars on a movie. Dune 2's budget was $190 million, for a sci-fi epic, with a proven audience. This is just a fantasy story.

Making the budget on debut is incredible lucky, but it might still be considered a "flop" because of the extra $200M or whatever of marketing budget.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

with a proven audience

Christopher Nolan is his own brand that has a proven audience. In a sense, Universal paid handsomely to poach him from Warner Brothers, and giving him big budgets is part of that deal.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And he has yet to disappoint or not make money so it's working fine. It already made over $260 million globally and the weekend isn't even over yet. It will absolutely still be the biggest movie to see for the next several weeks so it did it's job. Sometimes I feel like there isn't one thing on Lemmy that people can't find something to complain about! I can't wait to see it still, but there were no good seats at any theater near me when i finally decided to go. Next weekend it is!

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Lemmy is just full of contrarians because it's not-reddit. I've learned to just accept it at this point.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yeah it's like how Australia was originally a penal colony for Britain...

Many people are here because they were banned from Reddit. For better and for worse.

Those of us who voluntarily came here back during the API bullshit are old hat at this point.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

The whole internet is full of contrarians. I don't know why so many movie-goers are so determined not to enjoy anything

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's an xkcd pointing out that it's a lot easier to hate something everyone else likes, than to love something everyone else hates, and that honestly really changed the way I view popularity and contrarianism. I respect contrarians who can love what is hated but I'm totally dismissive of anyone trying to criticize what is popular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Anytime I look up a forum thread of a movie I'm watching/wanting to watch (spoiler-free), at least half of the comments are "this movie was trash and you should feel bad for liking it."

And the other half feel the need to justify why they liked it to the half that hated it for reasons they literally can't put into words (if they do it's always the most contrived/overused excuse in critiquing).

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still don't really know what you're trying to say. Did you mean to type "special effects" instead of "practical" at the beginning of your comment?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Practical effects are more expensive than computer generated, both are special effects.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Doesn't Disney spend that on most of their movies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Nolan was essentially making it so the gods were just figments of people’s imagination.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“If you don’t see ‘The Odyssey’ in Imax, you aren’t seeing it in the way that Chris Nolan intended,” says the company’s CEO

Translation "please don't pirate this movie. I know everyone prefers to just watch it at home in their underwear to having to deal with those kids in the back talking and the risk of getting long covid. But, please, think of our million dollar salaries."

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Don't worry, I won't pirate it.

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Still annoyed by the armour not invented until hundreds of years later, though.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Its fantasy...

Imagine if someone in a thousand years found starwars and people got shitty because we didnt have real light sabers yet

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I have no problem with that. My problem is that it is fantasy set in a real time in human history, and it deviates from that source it is based on. It is an adoption of a great work of art and it fumbles with the details.

[–] sachamato@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really want to wait so I can go to an IMAX to eTvh this film. Any recommendations or arguments against it?

[–] ViaGetty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wear earplugs! I watched it at home and the opening scene still shook the room. "It's supposed to be loud" is a really dumb reason to get ear damage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

What was the budget + marketing for this movie?

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

Nolan to chuds:

load more comments
view more: next ›