this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2026
238 points (98.0% liked)

politics

30405 readers
3034 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US House voted Tuesday to pass a measure to enact year-round Daylight Saving Time across the country, springing Congress forward into an issue that has long stumped lawmakers and spurred impassioned pleas by parents, farmers and others with sharply divergent views.

It will now head to the Senate for approval before going to the president for his signature — though its chances in the upper chamber remain unclear.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 32 minutes ago

I read somewhere that the Senate wants it to be Standard instead of DST, which I agree would wind up being better for most locations (not all). So they'll probably fight over it and nothing will happen. We'll see. At this point I just want to stop having to change the damn clocks.

I used to favor permanent DST because I'm not a morning person, but I realize most people aren't night-owls like me, and by now there's been a lot of evidence presented that it's healthier to be in sync with sunlight and more important to get good sleep, especially for kids. Of course a lot of this also depends on which side of your time zone you live on.

Between the two positions, for a long time I favored permanent half-DST, which is setting clocks halfway between so the offset isn't that bad for health and both sides of the standard vs DST debate could live with it. There was even a bill proposed to do that, but I recently read an article listing a few drawbacks to being on the half-hour compared to most other countries--mostly that it would be "confusing" which isn't that strong of an argument IMO. I still think this would be a good solution if a bunch of other countries also did it. A few countries already are offset a half-hour from us and no one complains because they're not major economic forces.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why couldn't they do permanent Standard Time? If history of permanent DST legislation prevails, this will be repealed within a year or two. Same as it will be in BC.

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Saskatchewan is effectively on year-round daylight savings time and has been for decades, and they love it. History is not as clear-cut that it will get reversed.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago

Bad move, this should be something done at the state level only. Some states benefit more from permanent DST while others benefit more from permanent ST.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Permanant DST was signed into law January 1974 and repealed October 1974. Everyone hated it, it went from 79% approval in December of 1973 to 46% in February of 1974.

[–] cookiecoookie@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Arizona loved it

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 27 points 6 hours ago

I don't care which one they lock in, as long as they just fucking pick one and stick to it. It's the changing that's the problem - we all have electric lights ffs.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 6 hours ago

They'll fuck it up and pick the wrong time, and it will be dark at 4:30 PM for the rest of our lives.

In 50 years, they'll try to switch to the other time, but Conservatives will fight it because they think they'll lose two hours, and they'll literally threaten a Civil War over two hours, then someone will try to explain that they'll actually GAIN two hours, and they'll say it's a Communist hoax with their two Socialist hours, just handing them out to people who don't deserve them, like the welfare queens just helping themselves to as many hours as the Demon-rats can steal from the billionaires who have more hours than everybody else combined.

So they'll compromise, and go back to switching times twice a year to keep NOBODY happy, and America can go back to normal.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 hours ago

How close are they to impeaching pedophiles in office?

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

One of very few things that administration has done right

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It was tried. They made DST permanent in Jan. 1974. It was repealed in Oct. 1974. Fastest I've ever heard of Congress fixing some shit it was so unpopular.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yes, they should have stuck with standard time instead of DST. OTOH, the thing everyone complained about was their kids having to walk to and from school in the dark. Now no one walks to school any more, so that doesn't apply (yes believe it or not most kids used to walk or ride their bike to and from school back then, unless it was too far and they rode the bus).

[–] oyo@lemmy.zip 9 points 8 hours ago

I'm happy to get rid of the change, but once again they ignore scientists and health experts with the choice of daylight time.

[–] methanemoose@lemmus.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Would be better if it was clear they did any research on the subject. Last time this came around it was clear, standard time was better for us. This now just feels like rich people will keep us poors on DST while they get the clock humans get a better night sleep with and still somehow take our money.

I hate that I can believe something like this.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, if you're self employed, it can already work that way. I never set up any meetings before noon, that way I wake with the sun. Sure it means that I'm starting my day at kinda random times as far as the clock is concerned, but my body likes that way better than setting an alarm to wake at the same clock time every day.

[–] SippyCup@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This is what working second shift is like. Wake up whenever, go to bed whenever. It was nice. Well, that part was nice. Everything else about it sucked.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 56 minutes ago

I loved working second shift for that reason! I never had to set my alarm! And I'm a night owl anyway so going to sleep at 1:30 or 2:00 am was fine. The part that sucked was I was working while other people were off work and awake so I only saw them on weekends. But I'm also mostly a loner so that was actually fine too. :)

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But Standard Time is superior! I oppose this measure!

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I hear this tossed around but, you're serious? In what form?

DST = more light during personal hours for the vast majority of people. Why would I want prime sunlight hours devoured by the corporate machine? No thank you.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Because dark is for sleep. It's less about making sure you have daylight to go do stuff and more about making sure people can sleep when it's dark.

I will absolutely agree that it is less fun, but sleep is pretty important. See also "Why we sleep" book by Matthew Walker. It will make you (albeit potentially briefly) stop drinking, cut caffeine, and go to bed early.

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I like to wake up early and go birdwatching.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

So go to bed and get up an hour earlier.

[–] invertedspear@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn’t help if they have to be at work before the birds are out of their roosts.

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I suppose that's true, the birds don't care about time zone shenanigans!

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

When they blamed farmers for DST, a farmer said "Cows wake up with the sun, they don't have a watch"

[–] mr_account@lemmy.world 37 points 15 hours ago

A distraction it may be, but I'll take a win where I can get one. Idgaf which version of the clock we're going with, I just want it to be consistent

[–] defaultusername@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 14 hours ago

Watch Trump veto it because he didn't get his election rigging "SAVE" act passed.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 59 points 19 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 45 points 19 hours ago (16 children)

Can we please go metric next? I'm old but an engineer (and a farmer) metric makes things so much easier...

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The US has been officially on the metric system since the Carter administration

[–] TIEPilot@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

IDK why we just didn't stick with it or at the least put both miles/km on the high way signs and slowly get people to acclimate to it...

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 19 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

This is good ... but the same kind of good like the captain of the Titanic declaring that the kitchens must supply vegetarian meal options to those who request it.

Yes, a good thing, but really far off from the most urgent issues facing the country, isn't it?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Climate change is one of the biggest existential threats to most species on earth, so no

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I guess daylight savings time might have a slight effect on greenhouse gas emissions ... but it's got to be quite small. This doesn't look like 'serious action on climate change' to me.

Maybe, in that case, it's more like the captain of the Titanic putting up a sticky note on the bridge that says 'watch out for icebergs' ... after they've already struck one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›