this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
232 points (97.2% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46730 readers
808 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First you needed to create an account to view reviews on the IMDB website.

As of today, the same has now been implemented for the mobile app. So far it was excluded from the enshittification but fuck IMDB and fuck Amazon who own IMDB.

What is another good movie / series review app that does not need an anal probe to look at reviews?

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scholar@lemmy.world 104 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Love TMDB.

The only downer is when someone posts a very right-wing coded review, there's no blocking or reporting functionality, so it stands. I don't care how 'woke' a person thinks something is. I want to hear a legit, constructive critique.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You weren't kidding. First review I bothered to read and it's clearly the ramblings of a mentally ill fascist. If this is common they should remove reviews entirely, as crazies waging culture war will hinder adoption.

"Masterpiece of reality" lol

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Wow, openly and explicitly makes the review political. So unnecessary. 🤦‍♂️

[–] Eeyore_Syndrome@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm an enjoyer of Trakt.tv.

[–] janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As a side note, "The Bride" is by far the worst movie I have ever watched.

[–] stumu415@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

I would not know as I could not read the reviews.

On a serious note, I stopped watching after 20 minutes and switched to Hungry hungry. Also shit but less shit.

[–] ruska@pawb.social 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

On a semi-related note, goodreads is also owned by Amazon. I've been using hardcover.app instead.

[–] WompWompWompRat@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Thanks for the recommendation. Just migrated to Hardcover.

[–] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

A while back Amazon started requiring logins to view or search product reviews. (They show a very limited number without login.)

Anyone who's ever looked through Amazon reviews knows a huge number of them (and sometime the majority) are bullshit, but apparently that's just fine with Amazon. They were able to completely shut down sites like fakespot.com with that one move so buyers are now on their own.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 12 points 2 days ago

Growing up with the internet, we were using IMDB as a way to win arguments or learn about shows. Back then, Wikipedia (or all those fandom wikis) didn't exist. So IMDB was the top place.

You saw a ridiculously gorgeous actor and wanted to creep on all their movies? IMDB.

You wanted to know what Simpsons episode had Poochie the dog? IMDB.

You wanted to know what people thought about the new characters in Lost Season 2? Yes, IMDB has forums.

It started going to shit before Amazon bought it. It became an absolute pile of shit where doing any of those three things listed above was near impossible without ads or clicking a dozen places.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago

They overestimate their importance?

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

I noticed this one too, come over at letterboxd.com.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I knew they were limiting features for the purpose of increasing click through and time-engaged when they removed the role from an actor/actress' Filmography.

So if you're watching a movie/show and you see a familiar face but can't place it, now instead of seeing the role at under the piece of media, you have to click See all and then scroll to find it.

The worst thing about it is that the actual insightful reviews are often hidden in the user reviews, while the rating and "featured" reviews often look quite biased or even manipulated in favor of the movie. Fuck imdb

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Letterboxd is pretty good, though it got bought by private equity a few years ago and they're now trying to flog it off to Netflix or Paramount, so probably numbered days

[–] whaleross@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Letterboxd has been great for movie buffs but it has gained a mainstream crowd over the years and become less trustworthy with big titles and movies with celebrities that people have the hornies for.

Still too bad to hear about these ambitions of making the big buck out of it.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Actually… I’m giving them the benefit of the doubt there.

With the entire internet flooded with abusive scrapers, putting text reviews behind a free login kinda makes sense. It’d dent bots and review manipulation programs, too, which are a huge issue on IMDB already.

Not that IMDB isn’t enshittified. You should use other databases, but still.

[–] lemdeggity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

I've noticed this sort if thing becoming more common and I think it is very much related to bots scraping the web. I'm sure they'll be happy to sell access to that data though.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I basically stopped using IMDb because it’s now useless. I’m not logging in.

My taste is 3-5 star movies.

The problem with IMDb is 80% of people rate movies on production quality. I like crappy movies, so production values are low and they lose a solid 4 stars. They’re not even b movies. But then there are “good” movies that utterly suck with awful plots and they get the same rating.

So I have to look at 3 stars, use the user rating to see if anyone finds the movie good despite its flaws, then I click their profile and see if they have lists. Those are gold. (Once I found a list called “movies I worked on” and it was some person movie from junk to big budget films over the years. )

Now that doesn’t work, so there’s no value.

[–] waz@feddit.uk 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which region?

I haven’t seen this apart from an account pop up that can be dismissed so far in UK.

[–] Strider@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

EU/DE certainly has been like this for a few days now.

[–] waz@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

I’m sure it won’t take long to infect everything.

[–] absquatulate@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Honestly you might find it more accurate to go by gut feeling/trailer or word of mouth. Imdb ratings are good for weeding out the truly bad ones, but for the rest it's fairly unreliable. You can also see rotten tomatoes, but these days it feels very astroturfed and I haven't really matched my rating with theirs for all but a couple movies that I saw. Letterboxd is better for user reviews but it's very hivemind-y because popular opinion prevails kn their ratings.

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ooh, open source! But they don't seem to have movie reviews?

[–] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It is supposed to cover anything in the world worth reviewing: books, movies, games, places; but not many people are using it yet.

[–] SalmiakDragon@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

I see. So the types of review listed is an 'as of yet' type of situation then.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago

I don't bother with ratings or reviews. If I think something might be good or interesting, I'll watch it.