this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
639 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

20656 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Meta Post Tags



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


If you are here asking: "Is this a science meme?"

Probably, yes. We use the Dawkins definition of meme: a replicating idea, not just an image macro with a fact on it. A good post here doesn't need to teach you something. It needs to make you ask something: who, what, where, when, and especially why or how.

Science isn't a filing cabinet of facts, it's a conversation. For example, a photo of an eel or other localized wildlife counts because most people never see one, and wonder is the first step of inquiry. A car meme counts if it makes you curious about what's under the bonnet. If you want to talk about something you noticed in the world, chances are someone else wants to talk about it too.

We moderate for vibe, not category. Pruning is light, especially where a post creates interesting discussion. Experimenting is encouraged.

See the pinned paper on Shitposting as Public Pedagogy if you want the academic case for why this works.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 8 points 8 hours ago

I see capitalism is going as well for the scientific community as it is for the rest of us.

[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 12 points 9 hours ago
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 15 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Maroon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I avoided commenting on this because this makes me very angry. What they did to that boy was fucking disgusting.

[–] fatcat@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Urgh…. My fucking god, that made me so angry.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

I still can't read it without tearing up

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

Then upload paper to SciHub and the Internet Archive

[–] sharktoes@lemmy.zip 27 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

I’ve heard of a lot of scientists using the dark web just to access research articles “illegally” lol

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 13 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

"the dark web" is police fascist fearmongering for tech that lets people access the internet from censored countries

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 hours ago

Counterpoint: it sounds super cool

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The dark web is a specific section of the *deep web that can be accessed only using specific software configurations or authorizations

The name make sense because it's in fact hidden, dark and makes quite a bit of sense, the problem is that dark things do make people quite a bit scared and that was then weaponized

And i say that because i don't want to go against whatever you said but to expand on the (in my opinion, too) simplistic view you shared

*the deep web is that huge chunk of the internet that is not indexed by any search engine

[–] IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

there are onion search engines and directories, and "the dark web" refers to ANY onion site

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I am sure i need to use the TOR network to use an onion search engine

Edit: apparently what i said is wrong

[–] diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I am sure I need the WWW network to use a search engine

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 13 hours ago

I mean, it is definitely not just that

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 24 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If you mean Sci-hub, then yeah that's completely normal. I've used Sci-hub to access my own article once when I had lost access to the published version.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 14 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I'd rather use sci-hub than institutional access when the article is available. Fuck publishers.

Really hope someone comes up, recognizes how much public research money is wasted on this bullshit and sets up a public publisher directly funded by research funds which allows people to publish and read freely.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 60 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that public funds go to research only for everything that those funds becoming privatized is a fucking crime.

No grant should be given to any research if the results aren't published on an open journal.

No grant should be given if any marketable discovery becomes privatized

I am still fucking pissed that most countries used public funds to develop a covid vaccine then gifted them to private for profit corporation. Same for basically every medical development.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 17 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Many countries' funding agencies require open access publications for work based on their funding. However, open access fees are insanely high in some journals (e.g. around $12k for the higher impact factor Nature journals)...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

We need nationally funded journals that are free for all people to read and mandate publication through them.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

I like the general direction of that idea. But honestly, not sure if this should be national with all the political pressure and censorship that could come from that. With how international scientific research is, perhaps the UN or a newly formed international organisation could oversee such journals.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

that's also bullshit, I reviewed papers for publication. it's free labour, hosting a pdf is nearly free.

there's no justification.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 4 points 15 hours ago

Oh yeah, those price tags are insane. They're making crazy profits of public money thanks to hiring schemes based on impact factors :/

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I like to keep the submitted version after review but without editing on my public repositories. Even when I publish open access.

Some of the papers I have reviewed was among the worse stuff I read.

I do not want to keep that

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago (18 children)

My mate Anna has a great archive of papers. Look her up some time!

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›