this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
353 points (98.4% liked)

politics

30329 readers
2143 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The site explained that it is most dangerous for folks who have had gender-affirming surgery to stop hormones. For this group, stopping medication can lead to heart complications, metabolic dysfunction, severe bone density loss, cognitive decline, and mood instability.

“For post-operative trans people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery and no longer have their original gonads, withdrawing hormones is not an option, it’s a medical crisis,” GenderGP wrote, adding that banning these hormones “isn’t a political statement, it’s medical malpractice.”


The sponsor of the bill to ban gender-affirming care, state Rep. Dirk Deaton (R), said in March that he decided to add the anti-trans provision to the bill because there have been a lot of new appointments to the court and “a lot of change… in the national conversation around this issue.”

Missouri is a shithole state. Though, technically speaking, this might arise to the level of cruel and unusual for the already-transitioned inmates for the same reason that denying medical care to regular people is cruel and unusual. Wonder how long until we just declare transgender people as illegal to force them to die. Its probably what all the bathroom bills and ID stuff is all about.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

God damn it. It’s my state. I hate it here.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wish it was a blue state like its big brother, Illinois.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They lie and cheat to keep us down. Just look at gerrymandering. We made a rule against it and they tricked voters into overturning it before it went into effect.

I don’t know if I’m in district 5 or 6 anymore. I checked on the states website and they didn’t know either. It’s a nightmare.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

I checked on the states website and they didn’t know either. It’s ~~a nightmare~~ intentionally malicious.

FTFY

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 15 points 1 day ago

Missouri is the state.

Fucking nazi atrocity. We need our own Nuremburg trials for this shit.

[–] Arrandee@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a transfemme Missourian, this is ever so reassuring.

Reassuring in the sense that if I chose to commit a crime, I know for certain I would fully commit to the enterprise of doing harm to my enemy, since imprisonment would be a death sentence anyway.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Reassuring in the sense that if I chose to commit a crime

How much you want to bet they're about to criminalize trans? Something about forging government documents or identity fraud?

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mild_deviation@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago

Probably the best way to do that is to GTFO, but that’s a huge undertaking that comes with many sacrifices.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember what happened to him and all the people who helped him?

[–] DonPiano@feddit.org 10 points 1 day ago

He died and most of them ended up in positions of power in post war germany?

[–] nullspace@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That seems unconstitutional.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

SCOTUS: hold my beer while I psychically determine what the slave owning founding fathers intended

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

I know, let's make up a whole new interpretation of the law based on what we think someone from hundreds of years ago thought. Let's call it something bonkers like originalism.

Then, because the theory has no legal foundation, let's threaten schools of law that they have to teach it or else.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/judge-urges-law-school-donation-halt-until-originalism-taught

Something something dumbest timeline ever.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It's been ruled a violation of the 8th amendment

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

People who co-sponsored these laws should go to prison, where they're forced to give up their religion.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

A huge issue with this, besides being cruel, is that about 60-70% of the non-federal jail population are just awaiting trial and may actually be innocent. This gives cops more incentive to just arrest those that they don’t like if they can’t afford to post bail.

This needs to go to a higher court immediately. I just hope they do the right thing…

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And so it begins.

Welcome to the trans genocide phase of the Trump presidency.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Hope lowering the price of eggs was worth it/s

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Well, in a supply and demand method of pricing, there are two ways to decrease prices. One is to lower demand. Nothing decreases demand like killing off some of the populace.

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

Hope giving the finger to the Dems was worth it.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 98 points 2 days ago (1 children)

America looking more like early Nazi Germany every day.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Jews will not replace us!

-These guys:

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I know what they did and what they stand for isnt funny at all, but I just zoomed in on these bargain Nazis and just can't help but laugh. Picturing them all waddling into home depot or Lowes to the garden section in their little khakis / white shirt uniform to get tiki torches.. Marching to the scent of citronella just mad because something something jews and brown people???

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I could believe that little tetrahedron symbol on his polo is some cryptofascist bullshit symbol that he had embroidered on at a mall kiosk because he's too chickenshit to actually own his bigotry and wear a Hakenkreuz...

...but I could also believe that there's some athleisure company out there with that logo where when that photo went viral saw it suddenly appear everywhere and just went Fffffuuuuuucckk mmmmeeeeeee..."

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can you clue me in to who these people are? I kinda thought it was a movie still but your comment made me second guess

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Can you clue me in to who these people are?

I'm not sure the names of those specific people, but it is a famous picture from Charlottesville's Unite the Right ralley. That white shirt in the foreground is a well known outfit for Vanguard America:

Vanguard America is a well known Neo-Nazi/White-Supremacist Group.

[–] Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The lighting is certainly cinematic.. The warm glow of tiki torches, not a mosquito within 5 miles.

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

So I guess it was from an Aug 11, 2017 alt-right rally called Unite the Right in Charlottesville Virginia and apparently his name is Peter Cytanovic

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

cruel and unusual punishment

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

And if you bring it to the supreme court, they'll just say "some people are born to suffer and die".

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

“For post-operative trans people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery and no longer have their original gonads, withdrawing hormones is not an option, it’s a medical crisis,”

Can someone please explain to me what happens to the body in this case?

[–] it_wasnt_arson@awful.systems 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

From what I understand, biological systems regulated by sex hormones require one or the other to work at all. For example, you get one pattern of post-puberty bone growth with estrogen, a different pattern with testosterone, and no bone growth at all if you have neither. These systems also have some counterbalancing factor, like your bones constantly being slowly dissolved to keep calcium in your bloodstream, so if you have no gonads and no supplementary hormones, you essentially speedrun osteoporosis over the course of a few years.

I'm not too clear on other effects, but a lot of things are downstream of "your bones slowly melt," and lots of other parts of your body rely on sex hormones to regulate them and will have long-term issues without them.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So did this happen to eunuchs in olden times too?

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Basically. But, the life span used to be shorter. Also, eunuchs didn't subject themselves to much that could cause them harm: they were mostly present as servants to rich/royal harems/wives of polygamy, or they were apart of the priesthood. But, their life expectancy was low, even for the time.

[–] Archelon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“The site explained that it is most dangerous for folks who have had gender-affirming surgery to stop hormones. For this group, stopping medication can lead to heart complications, metabolic dysfunction, severe bone density loss, cognitive decline, and mood instability.”

—The previous paragraph.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

All thanks to laws being made by people with zero knowledge of medical science

[–] Snowies@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It’s not about science or saving money or protecting inmates or women.

It never ever was.

It’s about hurting people they don’t like. To them, the government is either a red carpet or a cudgel.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago

This is why we need lobbyists. Donate to HRC and similar nonprofits

[–] black0ut@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago

B-but imaginary sky daddy! Protect the kids!

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

I vaguely remember that some hormones are relevant for bone integrity. I imagine losing that would be all around awful.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Freedom!

I'm sure having Democrats in charge would be jUsTaSbAd, by the way....

JFC.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This has been happening for years in red states, you just weren’t paying attention. Access to HRT in prison in a red state has always been a shitshow at best, and it’s been decades of back and forth lawsuits and new laws trying to get around the last lawsuit.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You just said what OP did with more words. As you pointed out, red states are the ones implementing the policies. Perhaps Democrats wouldn't be passing legislation to make it better, but they wouldn't be passing this trash.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 days ago

Wow, 1st you can beat your pregnant wife with no consequences and now this...what a "lovely" place...

As if the prison system in the US wasn't already unnecessarilly cruel.

[–] TheFresh16@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Honestly I'd rather die than have t in my body, not to mention also be rotting away in a prison cell.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It’s time for socialism and exiling all conservatives

load more comments
view more: next ›