this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
441 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

32403 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What's the first one then?

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

As the epoch is signed, the first date might refer to December 1901, at least for a 32-bit number.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s seconds past the Epoch, the integer 1 would be January 1st, 1970 12:00:01 AM

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I guess which it should be date 1. With the date expressed in milliseconds that'd make it 999 milliseconds earlier than what you wrote.

12:00:01 would be the time at which the guy finally came.

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In java LinkedList, the method .get(0) is equivalent to .getFirst().

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

This is a good point. Even in a zero-based index, the first element is the first element. So, the first date is still a zero timestamp.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Holy overzealous NSFW tag, Batman! 🤦🏻😆

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Nah. Unnecessarily blurred (or, in the case of some user/client settings, completely hidden) posts are a nuisance.

Especially for something as innocuous as three letters of text.

[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think anyone will suffer if they don't see this (mildly interesting) post because they have chosen to hide nsfw content. I think anyone who decides to hide nsfw stuff has only themselves to blame if they miss the most interesting stuff.

I find this "don't censor obscenities here, whe're not on F*c*book" mentality just as annoying as the censoring itself. If you don't like the way someone is writing, don't read it. There are millions of other posts for you.

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, the thing I mean is much worse. I don't dare saying it's name, but it's a social network by **rk *uckerber*

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

came here to say basically this lmao

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 8 points 2 weeks ago

And if we're still both 32 bits dating, instead of getting married into 64 bits, we'll have some problems in January 2038...

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How did people reproduce before that?

[–] jwt@programming.dev 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sex before the first date.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I think that’s called assault.

[–] jwt@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You're assuming it's nonconsensual.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Depends on your time zone. It would still be new years eve in the US.

[–] CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

If someone who had conceived on 1 Jan 1970 they would be born around end of Aug / beginning of Sept, and be 56 years old