Programmer Humor

32420 readers

981 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

441

Use protection (sub.wetshaving.social)

submitted 2 weeks ago by weird@sub.wetshaving.social to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

NSFW 23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's the zeroth date.

[–] weird@sub.wetshaving.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What's the first one then?

[–] blackbeans@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 weeks ago

As the epoch is signed, the first date might refer to December 1901, at least for a 32-bit number.

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If it’s seconds past the Epoch, the integer 1 would be January 1st, 1970 12:00:01 AM

[–] ranzispa@mander.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I guess which it should be date 1. With the date expressed in milliseconds that'd make it 999 milliseconds earlier than what you wrote.

12:00:01 would be the time at which the guy finally came.

[–] OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In java LinkedList, the method .get(0) is equivalent to .getFirst().

[–] SystemDisc@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

This is a good point. Even in a zero-based index, the first element is the first element. So, the first date is still a zero timestamp.