this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2026
7 points (65.2% liked)

Perchance - Create a Random Text Generator

1908 readers
17 users here now

⚄︎ Perchance

This is a Lemmy Community for perchance.org, a platform for sharing and creating random text generators.

Feel free to ask for help, share your generators, and start friendly discussions at your leisure :)

This community is mainly for discussions between those who are building generators. For discussions about using generators, especially the popular AI ones, the community-led Casual Perchance forum is likely a more appropriate venue.

See this post for the Complete Guide to Posting Here on the Community!

Rules

1. Please follow the Lemmy.World instance rules.

2. Be kind and friendly.

  • Please be kind to others on this community (and also in general), and remember that for many people Perchance is their first experience with coding. We have members for whom English is not their first language, so please be take that into account too :)

3. Be thankful to those who try to help you.

  • If you ask a question and someone has made a effort to help you out, please remember to be thankful! Even if they don't manage to help you solve your problem - remember that they're spending time out of their day to try to help a stranger :)

4. Only post about stuff related to perchance.

  • Please only post about perchance related stuff like generators on it, bugs, and the site.

5. Refrain from requesting Prompts for the AI Tools.

  • We would like to ask to refrain from posting here needing help specifically with prompting/achieving certain results with the AI plugins (text-to-image-plugin and ai-text-plugin) e.g. "What is the good prompt for X?", "How to achieve X with Y generator?"
  • See Perchance AI FAQ for FAQ about the AI tools.
  • You can ask for help with prompting at the 'sister' community Casual Perchance, which is for more casual discussions.
  • We will still be helping/answering questions about the plugins as long as it is related to building generators with them.

6. Search through the Community Before Posting.

  • Please Search through the Community Posts here (and on Reddit) before posting to see if what you will post has similar post/already been posted.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
eatham@lemmy.world
eatham@aussie.zone
VioneT@lemmy.world
perchance@lemmy.world
7
Urgent: CSAM distribution, predation, and extremely questionable material being shared on a Perchance generator (perchance.org)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by matesineedhelp@lemmy.world to c/perchance@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

@perchance , or any other authority on the site that can fulfill my request

I am filing an URGENT demand for immediate intervention and total domain deactivation / deletion, or the removal of comments regarding the subdomains perchance.org/ai-chat.

This platform is actively facilitating systemic child sexual exploitation, the distribution of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) of infants and more, severe extortion, and predatory behaviors targeting minors.

The comment sections and user-generated outputs within these specific generators contain explicit logs of extremely questionable fantasies, infant abuse references, and real-world predator behaviors. Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional, leaving a large population of underage users completely exposed to dangerous individuals without any active safety oversight or intervention.

We already have a case with the NCMEC The case ID is the following: 247751090

A few witness testimonies can be found here: user.uploads.dev/file/39f28b26b589b5433cd06e96e3627702.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/ef0d4fde2ca95bb780e62c42211ed3cf.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/89bd8506a429c11a2b48e6477c67794a.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/95659ff95687040c60334ad81674249d.jpg user.uploads.dev/file/308738d9af319653b9738e402e11a98a.jpg

Please, remove the comments of the site; or the site itself immediately to prevent further illegal activity!

Thank you

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Update:

Case ID: 247751090 [2026-07-08 06:24:03] Case ID: 249451324 [2026-07-08 17:33:09] Case ID: 247759639 [2026-07-08 18:36:54] Case ID: 249540283 [2026-07-08 18:45:18] Case ID: laacur-20260708-N10 [2026-07-08 18:48:23] Case ID: 249542360 [2026-07-08 18:49:54] Case ID: 249542716 [2026-07-08 18:59:41]
Case ID: 249543071 [2026-07-08 18:59:49] Case ID: 249542931 [2026-07-08 19:06:59] Case ID: 249544938 [2026-07-08 23:23:19] Master Case ID: 249570170

All,of the following cases were filed JUST today alone

The further distribution of rape related materials is still persisting, and zoophilic media was sent by an anonymous user today

Please remove the comment section at once

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Privately owned websites that have chatrooms are not recommended for the faint of heart. That's just the truth. The file uploader has a filter for content, your claims that people are using the website to share CSAM is a loaded claim.

"user-generated outputs within these specific generators contain explicit logs of extremely questionable fantasies" Other than galleries that have images the generations that we users create are images that we save from our own browsers. What logs are you talking about? The information on every user's browser is different. It is clear that you do not know how this website works. If you are looking at anyone's logs it would indicate that you are spying on other people's browsers somehow.

"Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional" That is an obvious lie, there have been bans in the chatrooms and there are filters on what can be uploaded.

"A few witness testimonies can be found here" Only one of the images is visible for me the links don't work for the others.

"large population of underage users completely exposed to dangerous individuals without any active safety oversight or intervention."

The parents of any children should monitor their children's internet activities, this is a website owned by a private citizen, it has filters, moderation, warnings on pages for adult oriented generators. You have lied more than a few times in this post and made baseless claims. This website is not a business that charges the users money or a project that is sustained by donations.

"Please, remove the comments of the site; or the site itself immediately to prevent further illegal activity!" You're not providing proof of your claims. That's the problem.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What logs are you talking about? The information on every user’s browser is different. It is clear that you do not know how this website works. If you are looking at anyone’s logs it would indicate that you are spying on other people’s browsers somehow.

Chatlogs, obviously It’s helpful if you do me the honors of merely asking instead of jumping to conclusions

That is an obvious lie, there have been bans in the chatrooms and there are filters on what can be uploaded.

Relative to the gen that we’re referencing, please name me at least one person that’s been actually banned for egregious behavior by a moderator RECENTLY

Only one of the images is visible for me the links don’t work for the others

Mate 🫩 Did you add the https:// to the beginning of the links? It’s not that they don’t work It is, as you put it; censoring of the image given its verbal content Adding what I just mentioned should be of value

You’re not providing proof of your claims. That’s the problem.

And what specifically would you like me to provide evidence for? I’ve already literally provided the formal case ID, and witness testimonies; what specifically do you want me to prove?

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A British guy, no surprise. Britain is essentially the poster child for internet censorship these days.

"Chat logs, obviously It’s helpful if you do me the honors of merely asking instead of jumping to conclusions"

So, no material, no actual content, just chat rooms, that people can choose to enter, avoid, or leave. You can find similar people in chat rooms literally throughout the whole internet. Yes, people are reported and there is moderation contrary to your false claim.

"Relative to the gen that we’re referencing, please name me at least one person that’s been actually banned for egregious behavior by a moderator"

If you searched this Lemmy forum you could find posts about that very subject. https://lemmy.world/post/49043595

"Someone keeps mass reporting me." - MeowerMisfit817

But according to you there is zero moderation and reports are therefore impossible. I'll take your words and hold you to them.

Do the due diligence of typing your links correctly, it is expected that a reader will simply copy and paste them.

"And what specifically would you like me to provide evidence for? I’ve already literally provided the formal case ID, and witness testimonies; what specifically do you want me to prove?"

If you make the claim that the website is one where people are sharing CSAM and all you have are some dodgy screenshots of chat messages, then no, you have no evidence. The chatters in these chatrooms are anonymous people and you could easily fabricate scenarios by sending these messages. Chatrooms are littered throughout the entirety of the internet and ever since they were created children were warned not to join them. The same is true with VRchat. Are you going to try to shut VRchat down as well?

Perchance has chat rooms, moderation, and report functions. You want this to be an account based website and it is not that type of website as a privately owned website that is not a marketplace there is a certain degree of freedom that it has. The images uploaded are filtered, nsfw chat bots cannot be linked. Where is the CSAM that you claim is on the website?

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So, no material, no actual content, just chat rooms, that people can choose to enter, avoid, or leave. You can find similar people in chat rooms literally throughout the whole internet. Yes, people are reported and there is moderation contrary to your false claim.

Have you been paying attention to absolutely anything I’ve been saying? There are entire chat rooms literally filled with the exchange of child sexual material (CSM), child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and footage of other distasteful materials

If you searched this Lemmy forum you could find posts about that very subject. https://lemmy.world/post/49043595

“ I'm getting sick. Fourth shadowban.”

Which, again, draws back to my primary point

>To add, the automated system in question is again useless in this scenario, given that the bad actors constantly alternate IPs to continue further distribution

Keep in mind, that even if they don’t switch IPs, the shadowbans typically only last for a 3 day interval, allowing them to continue highly illegal activity

But according to you there is zero moderation and reports are therefore impossible. I’ll take your words and hold you to them

Yes, and I’ll absolutely stand firm in this. Hell, ask literally any present in the chatroom at any given time; or ask people who actually fled the original site for proper human moderation (You can find some of them here: https://perchance.org/safe-ai-chat)

If you make the claim that the website is one where people are sharing CSAM and all you have are some dodgy screenshots of chat messages, then no, you have no evidence. The chatters in these chatrooms are anonymous people and you could easily fabricate scenarios by sending these messages. Chatrooms are littered throughout the entirety of the internet and ever since they were created children were warned not to join them. The same is true with VRchat. Are you going to try to shut VRchat down as well?

I, again, have a physical federal case with the NCMEC; I’ve sent the ID above. That isn’t the only evidence we have. Like I said earlier, multiple users there catalogue clips, direct screenshots, and occasionally report the materials to accredited law agencies in ‘exposed’ channels.

For example, X gets exposed for posting CSM Someone will make a channel called “xexposed” with direct clips, screenshots with censored links, and further background information; along with forcing a DNI rule that rarely ever works

If a creator allows their generator to become a loophole for creating illegal images, internet infrastructure providers (like domain registrars or web hosts) will pull the plug on the entire site to protect themselves from criminal prosecution; which is something entirely unique from Internet intermediaries like VR Chat / Reddit.

What the hell would I get out of fabricating ANY of the information? Where in the photo, do you think it’s fabricated specifically? Do you have evidence to support the notion of fabrication?

As I’ve stated before with the safe-ai-chat gen, you can inquire independently there about others personal experience with the comments of the old gen if you don’t tske my own word

Just because children are not supposed to be there, doesn’t mean they are not; hence why it’s advisable the gen gets deleted or the comments get removed entirely

Ignoring it and becoming a bystander just because the material is widespread is a nonsensical argument. Should the police merely halt cyber-activity given that scammers most likely will persist into the foreseeable future?

Perchance has chat rooms, moderation, and report functions. You want this to be an account based website and it is not that type of website as a privately owned website that is not a marketplace there is a certain degree of freedom that it has. The images uploaded are filtered, nsfw chat bots cannot be linked. Where is the CSAM that you claim is on the website

AIC has chatrooms, absolutely no moderation, and report functions that are unviable for actual resolution; that you supposedly claim is a proper substitution for human moderation.

I want the site itself to at least be minimally moderated, don’t put words in my mouth.

The images cannot be filtered, the upload module itself has no filter. The most it can do if it encountered anything nsfw, is put an 18+ emoji and remove the https://, which again only happened fairly recently.

I can’t genuinely redirect someone to the specific channel names, given that it’s legally risky, but I’d be more than happy to provide the information to an actual moderator / developer to prove my own point of exchange regarding both csm, csam, and more

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Have you been paying attention to absolutely anything I’ve been saying? There are entire chat rooms literally filled with the exchange of child sexual material (CSM), child sexual abuse material (CSAM), and footage of other distasteful materials"

Is what you claim. That content would be shared with filesharing links like catbox, why would any of you click links from anonymous strangers that you don't know? You have no proof of any footage, you're making claims at this point and honestly it seems like the possible scenario is that people are posting links from other websites that have that content in them, this is a problem that is inherent to chat rooms with anonymous users.

Which, again, draws back to my primary point

No it does not, because it shows that your claim that moderation is entirely absent is a lie. The options in blocking anonymous users are limited, since there are no accounts, only ISPs can be used to block a user, and obviously they can use VPNs. But, this is the risk of any anonymous chatroom or anonymous image board. There are not accounts, people cannot be perma banned by account because the users themselves are largely anonymous. So, yes, there is moderation, but since there are no accounts and the users are anonymous which is an extremely common feature in chatrooms not much can be done to utterly ban a user. Just say that you want accounts. People have to practice caution in this respect, because you are in fact dealing with anonymous users who can post any link in the chat and they will not be found. This has been the risk of chatrooms since forever.

Yes, and I’ll absolutely stand firm in this. Hell, ask literally any present in the chatroom at any given time; or ask people who actually fled the original site for proper human moderation (You can find some of them here: https://perchance.org/safe-ai-chat)

I, again, have a physics, federal case with the NCMEC; I’ve sent the ID above. That isn’t the only evidence we have. Like I said earlier, multiple users there catalogue clips, direct screenshots, and occasionally report the materials to accredited law agencies in ‘exposed’ channels.

You have chat logs, because when I asked you about any material that Perchance was hosting on their side you did not give me any reply that they did. You're talking about anonymous people in chatrooms sending links from filesharing websites that do not care about what they archive on their servers. I am laser focused on the content on the Perchance website, I am not referring to what anonymous strangers are linking in the chatrooms. There are safer options to find friends than anonymous chatrooms. There are a multitude of websites where the users are tracked by accounts and can be perma banned and this website is not an account based website and all of you in the chatrooms have full knowledge that you are talking with anonymous strangers who at most can get ISP banned and you take that risk.

I want the site itself to at least be minimally moderated, don’t put words in my mouth.

How is it putting words in your mouth if you said something that is objectively untrue? If there is entirely no moderation as you claimed, there would not be reports or bans. So, you emotionally lied about it and lying does not make you believable especially when you are making very big claims about this website as a whole no less.

The images cannot be filtered, the upload module itself has no filter. The most it can do if it encountered anything nsfw, is put an 18+ emoji and remove the https://, which again only happened fairly recently.

I've tested the upload filter and had images blocked, so, you are in fact lying again. You do not understand how the website functions, that's obvious. There is a NSFW warning but there is also an upload filter, it will even block uploaded text content at times.

I can’t genuinely redirect someone to the specific channel names, given that it’s legally risky, but I’d be more than happy to provide the information to an actual moderator / developer to prove my own point of exchange regarding both csm, csam, and more

Considering that you have lied a number of times in this thread shows that you are not even trustworthy in general, so, you made a lot of claims, all you have are chat logs. So, I don't know what to make of that. The Dev I am sure has his own opinions about all of this.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Is what you claim. That content would be shared with filesharing links like catbox, why would any of you click links from anonymous strangers that you don’t know? You have no proof of any footage, you’re making claims at this point and honestly it seems like the possible scenario is that people are posting links from other websites that have that content in them, this is a problem that is inherent to chat rooms with anonymous users.

They use catbox + the file uploader for distribution usually, so you’re largely correct there. Why are you scrutinizing the adolescents clicking the links, and not the people literally actively distributing them? I do, and like I said earlier, the Case ID from the NCMEC was given; in what world is this a lack of proof? You’re circlejerking back to the SAME arguments, and you’re yet to falsify any of my own. I do have extensive evidence of csm exchanges in literally designated chat rooms; and it’s a mix of both, frankly. I’ve seen people post both AI generated csm and export CSM from elsewhere onto the comment section itself.

Yes, as it is a problem; so is it an immense legal risk, unless you have an alternative which is active moderation; the only viable option is to remove the comments on that specific gen altogether.

***>Any internet service provider or website operator who obtains knowledge of facts or circumstances involving CSAM must immediately report it to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC). ***- 18 U.S.C. § 2258A

So yes, you do have something like that in America. It’s obvious you have little legal knowledge

~I am laser focused on the content on the Perchance website, I am not referring to what anonymous strangers are linking in the chatrooms. There are safer options to find friends than anonymous chatrooms. There are a multitude of websites where the users are tracked by accounts and can be perma banned and this website is not an account based website and all of you in the chatrooms have full knowledge that you are talking with anonymous strangers who at most can get ISP banned and you take that risk.~

And I understand that; but there again, I’ve absolutely met the harden of proof requirements. I’m failing to see your astute mental blockage, what users exchange anonymous or not on the platform; is CSM, and it’s because they link it and exchange it so frequently, that brings severe let’s, issue. Well no shit! What makes you think that any teenager present on the site would tale the alternative, though? As is, we have a safer versions we are already struggling to get everyone aboard too

Section 230 also explicitly does not apply to federal criminal law. A platform owner who is notified of systematic CSAM or grooming behavior in their public chatrooms and actively chooses to ignore it can face severe federal criminal liability for facilitating or harboring illicit content

Dismissing a formal federal tracking case as "baseless" because the forum users themselves can't see the underlying backend database shows a total ignorance of how cyber-crime investigations function 🫩

I’ve tested the upload filter and had images blocked, so, you are in fact lying again. You do not understand how the website functions, that’s obvious. There is a NSFW warning but there is also an upload filter, it will even block uploaded text content at times

This, is a lie. Please, send a screenshot where the images you uploaded were rejected by the filter. Spend less time leveraging your “knowledge” on the site, and more time trying to reason with my own arguments.

Considering that you have failed to prove I have lied a number of times in this thread shows that you are not even trustworthy in general. I have chat logs, federal case files, and images I can send to the dev is the burden of proof is asked, yet again.

Just pray the dev sees this shit mate

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am not your mate. That is a queer thing to say to me. Find a lady, find a woman to be your mate. You are making the claims, so the burden of proof lies with you. My experience with the filter is that I have personally had images and lore books blocked because of their content. Users have talked about that on Reddit and probably on this Lemmy forum too. I did not make the claims that the website has no moderation and no filter on uploads. I've taken citations from the forums before to disprove your false claim about the moderation and I will keep an eye out for people who have had NSFW file uploads filtered, it's honestly not my responsibility to do research on your behalf whilst you make definite claims about how the website functions.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Missing the point award 🥇

Again, send a screenshot that clearly shows outright blockage of said materials and again, please provide evidence of recent moderation on the gen we’ve been debating about for the last day

Also, I wasn’t the first person to mention this either

You’re yet to prove anything relevant to current claims, frankly

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Again, also a few more user testimonies on SAIC (https://perchance.org/safe-ai-chat) where the majority of the original inhabitants of AIC had fled

You in all seriousness, cannot merely look at this having witnessed the reported media itself; and dismiss it with a “but just close the tab!!!!!!” 🫩 ; just as you can’t claim this is apparently falsified with absolutely no external reporting / investigation on your end.

What’s going on in that chatroom is completely unacceptable, and it should, be every legal means, be removed

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is a pretty good example of what I’m referencing The user present in the photo, with the tag KSTG was sent literal infant sexual assault material in their secret messages under the guise that is was a “dog picture”

The image was further circulated likely due to immaturity, and chaos obviously ensured

If you have any specific questions about this, most of the users on there actually keep quite a detailed log of offending users on something called “exposed channels” where they catalogue what others are doing an enforce a DNI social rule

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Chatrooms themselves are this way, no one should click links in chatrooms, why would any of you go into a room full of anonymous users that you cannot hold accountable especially if they use VPNs? Why click on unknown catbox links? This is stupid behavior. Chatrooms themselves are neutral, the people in them are not. The same is true with VRchat or 4chan; neither one of those has been shut down yet. Perchance is not at fault for simply allowing chatrooms on their private website, they have a moderation system even if you don't like it. That is no reason to lie about them and claim moderation is entirely absent. Avoid the chatrooms, enter at your own risk. The same advice was true with the first internet chatrooms created and it is still true now.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Chatrooms themselves are this way, no one should click links in chatrooms, why would any of you go into a room full of anonymous users that you cannot hold accountable especially if they use VPNs? Why click on unknown catbox links? This is stupid behavior

I cannot agree more, and many others have pointed this out before you; but do you think this is even remotely practical for the average user (who’s likely a 12-16 yo) there? Absolutely not!

The same is true with VRchat or 4chan; neither one of those has been shut down yet. Perchance is not at fault for simply allowing chatrooms on their private website, they have a moderation system even if you don’t like it. That is no reason to lie about them and claim moderation is entirely absent. Avoid the chatrooms, enter at your own risk. The same advice was true with the first internet chatrooms created and it is still true now.

Under federal laws like the STRIKE Act and strict international regulations, platforms have zero immunity when it comes to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or severe exploitation. A platform cannot legally contract out of criminal liability by telling users to "enter at their own risk." If illegal content is being facilitated or hosted, the platform is legally obligated to remove it, regardless of any disclaimers. If a platform’s moderation system routinely allows severe, systemic exploitation to occur without intervention, the system is functionally non-existent for those violations.

Courts increasingly view broken, unstaffed, or purely performative moderation systems as evidence of willful blindness or gross negligence. Private ownership does not grant a license to ignore federal crimes.

If a lock on a door is broken and anyone can walk in, saying "the building has no security" is an accurate description of reality, even if a broken lock technically physical exists.

  • Pointing out that a platform is failing to police severe criminal behavior is protected whistleblowing and safety advocacy, not a "lie" against the developer.

Get out of the Wild West mentality, bystanding does nothing now

Merely not entering the chat doesn’t erase criminal liability, it doesn’t erase the nudes of these children being exchanged, and it surely doesn’t have any actual significance in the broader pursuit of legal justice.

Come on dude, you and me both know it won’t do anything to address the matter at hand

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not your mate or your dude. No. None of that "come on dude" stuff with me. I don't like the fact that you lied and said moderation was entirely absent on this website

Under federal laws like the STRIKE Act and strict international regulations, platforms have zero immunity when it comes to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) or severe exploitation. A platform cannot legally contract out of criminal liability by telling users to “enter at their own risk.” If illegal content is being facilitated or hosted, the platform is legally obligated to remove it, regardless of any disclaimers. If a platform’s moderation system routinely allows severe, systemic exploitation to occur without intervention, the system is functionally non-existent for those violations.

"There is no enacted federal law officially designated as the "STRIKE Act." However, labor-related legislation, such as the Empowering Striking Workers Act of 2025 (S. 2731 / H.R. 5206) and the Tax Cut for Striking Workers Act, have been introduced in Congress to provide unemployment benefits and tax relief for striking workers." - Gemini AI

Are you talking about British laws? Because we do not have that here in the US.

Courts increasingly view broken, unstaffed, or purely performative moderation systems as evidence of willful blindness or gross negligence. Private ownership does not grant a license to ignore federal crimes.

What are you even citing? Because you have yet to prove anything except show some chat logs, you can report the users. You have yet to prove that Perchance has committed or ignored any crime.

Get out of the Wild West mentality, bystanding does nothing now

You're citing an article or something. I don't care about slogans, I care about substance, You have made substantial claims and lied a few times about both the absence of moderation and filtering which I have tested myself and had both image and text blocked by the upload filter, there are posts about that function on this Lemmy forum. Your trustworthiness was shot when you lied in the first post.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago

Are you talking about British laws? Because we do not have that here in the US.

Please, use Google or reference my upper reply 🫩 Yes, we do

What are you even citing? Because you have yet to prove anything except show some chat logs, you can report the users. You have yet to prove that Perchance has committed or ignored any crime

I, explaining, and I’m not obligated to prove anything to you in anus ense. I’m only trying to explain the background, and the immense urgency of the issue at hand. My goal was, and is; to get the attention of the dev so I can forward all the available data to him.

Believe me, I’m interested in winning this pedantic internet flame war with another brick wall; but I’m legally liable if I directly distribute imagery or links to the imagery here; or at all.

Again, for the love of Christ, all reports only go to an automated AI system that shadowbans users for an extended period of time depending on the rate and frequency they’re reported at. Didn’t you, someone’s who’s claiming to be knowledgeable of the site, read what the developer themselves on this? Can you explain how this can legally ensure the material is being further hindered permanently besides a literal menial temporary ban? No, you can’t.

You’re failing to meet YOUR burden of proof now Prove that human moderation on the site has been present as of less than two years ago

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That obviously, only works to a certain extent and can’t ensure the actual removal of said materials

Hence, in the scenario it even was removed, distribution on both public and private channels would exist for genuine trade / shock factor

It’s the biggest driver of why I want the site to be deleted

By site, to clarify, I mean AIC Not perchance collectively

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional”

How do they ban and unban people if they have no moderation?

Sorry about that - fixed. It was a false positive in the moderation system, and I’ve tweaked things to reduce the chance of this type of issue coming up again. Also thanks for the tip on the unban bug in the other thread - that should be fixed now (let me know if not ofc).

"And thanks for the prompt length cutoff issue in reproduction in the other thread. That should be fixed tomorrow. Hopefully prompt weights too. But probably not negative prompts - I’m still trying to fix that. The “CFG burn” issues and related tendency to push stuff towards cartoon/anime won’t be solved immediately either, but I am working on it." - https://lemmy.world/post/42343571 https://lemmy.world/u/perchance?page=2&sort=New&view=Overview

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How do they ban and unban people if they have no moderation?

Reporting from 5-6 unique IPs initiates a shadow ban upon the reported user for a time interval ranging from 3 days to 2 weeks on average, the issue is moderation from that specific gen is completely and utterly absent

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You claimed that moderation for Perchance is "entirely absent", so, it has to be one or the other. If there is moderation which there is, it means you lied in your post. Why change your words. If people can make reports, moderation is not absent.

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The reports are literally just forwarded to an automated AI system that will ban their IP if given enough reported, as I’ve said.

Sorry then, I’ll clarify, AIC has absolutely NO moderation I want you to provide evidence the gen has been actively moderated, given that this issue has been apparent since 2023 last time I checked; with users colloquially known as “Bathwater, “Noire,” and others taking lead in trying to report the materials.

To add, the automated system in question is again useless in this scenario, given that the bad actors constantly alternate IPs to continue further distribution

[–] Windydove@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You made the claim, "Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional" and therefore you have to prove that moderation is entirely absent as you stated. If there are no accounts how can those users be perma banned? So, Perchance bans the ISP, that is all that can be done in anonymous chatrooms. So, yes there is moderation, people get reported and banned. So your claim "Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional" is a complete lie. If your point is so important and so urgent why are you lying to us to make that point?

[–] matesineedhelp@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Yes, it is again; entirely absent currently. As I’ve stated before, certain users like MCMG were perma banned a great while back, and there has been absolutely no action to perma ban users that are actively distributing illegal materials as of roughly ~2 or so years ago; up to now. No, there isn’t moderation, please again by all means; prove recent moderation of the site specifically.

[–] eyebagsemoji@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

I agree with this post. I previously made a post about this and can attest to the issue on a personal basis as well. it bothers me that the average response seems to be "aha, why don't you just ignore it" which is pointless and solves nothing. this is a case where a comment section controlled by a developer, who can be personally contacted, is plainly being used for exchange of illegal material, and there's not some amazing positive offsetting that fact. I wouldn't necessarily want to moderate such a comment section either, so I don't want to heap all the shame on the developer, but now it should be closed considering the facts