this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
876 points (99.9% liked)

politics

30506 readers
2340 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The democratic socialist Melat Kiros unseated the long-serving US representative Diana DeGette in Colorado’s primary elections held on Tuesday, the latest in a string of high-profile victories for the party’s insurgent left.

The Associated Press reported that Kiros had defeated DeGette for the Democratic nomination in the deep-blue first congressional district centered on Denver. Kiros’s triumph came a week after New York voters unseated two Democratic congressional incumbents and replaced a third who was retiring with candidates who had campaigned on standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AgaveInMyAss@lemmy.world 179 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

insurgent left

Fuck off with that shit

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Billionaire News strikes again

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 3 weeks ago (29 children)

It's The Guardian, they operate on reader donations so that they're not beholden to billionaires.

The word choice here is somewhat poor, but I don't get the sense that this article is lamenting...

load more comments (29 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They’re trying to make these people look radical, when their platforms are centrist stuff most other western nations have done for decades. Her platform is universal healthcare, universal pre-k, building homes, not funding wars in the Middle East, and not taking money from big corporations and billionaires.

How is that radical?

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In America, that is incredibly radical.

However, this is one of a string of incredible wins for the DSA, and I am very glad. As someone who has for a long time been despondent about electoral political change, it is a sign that the alternative - armed resistance and civil war - will not be necessary.

We should all support the DSA as much as we can if we do not want to see entire neighbourhoods on fire, civilians being slaughtered by the thousands, or all the other horrible shit that is inevitable in war.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, this is why so many of us have been saying stuff to the effect of "Wait till after midterms to see if democracy can prevail. If they cheat, or ignore the results, then all bets are off and anything goes. Until then, all is not yet lost, but if we resort to violence when there's still hope of peace, all will be lost."

There's still hope in a peaceful way out of this. The fascists want us to believe there isn't, but clearly they're nervous about this election so apparently they haven't rigged it as bad as they want us to think they have.

The people advocating for open revolt are not only jumping the gun, but they're feeding right into the fascists' plans. Some of them may even be fascists in disguise. Be very wary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Godric@lemmy.world 108 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Wait I was told voting never works and not to bother, wtf???

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well you see, the people saying that have an interest in you NOT voting, so they have to say that.

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Some of the other people saying that were just out of hope, like me.

This example, and the other wins from the DSA, are giving me a bit of hope again.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 3 weeks ago

The tankies are gonna be in shambles when the rest of us on the left prove that we can actually vote our way out of this mess. Shambles, I say!

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Not voting sends a message."

Yeah, it fuckin' does.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Psuedo-leftists love to espouse this bullshit all the time.

They're the same assholes who end masse refused to show up to their 2016 or 2020 primaries. Then they claimed the DNC rigged it from the start and Bernie couldn't possibly have won (yes he fucking could have if more people turned out).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fireweed@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Diana DeGette was defeated by someone as old as her incumbency.

Love to see it. This is what should happen when you don't pass the baton.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 51 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Insurgent left lol. What's next? "Leftist are using BLITZKRIEG tactics to win votes"

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Tbh pretty accurate to the definition of the word. They're winning in opposition to DNC authority despite all efforts to suppress them.

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yea, honestly I think 'insurgent' is complementary in this context

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At least they didn't use "insurgent" in the headline, I suppose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

In a fascist government, insurgency is necessary. What are you complaining about?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Remember when Jan 6th happened and all you would hear on the news is insurgency this and insurgency that? This is how they devalue the meaning of the words used against them. Now everything we don't like is an insurgency and what happened on Jan 6th was a nothingburger.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Hey the Ellison News Corp knows where you live!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeckPacker@piefed.social 41 points 3 weeks ago

standing up to Israel amid accusations that it was carrying out a genocide in Gaza.

Yeah, shure Guardian, these are just "accusations" from crazy leftists.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Cool, let's see how she uses her position to improve the lives of her constituents. It's a big moment for a few people to really sell an idea particularly against large amounts of dissent and apprehension. That means they don't need to be normal or good, they need to be stellar. Society is a numbers game and to win the game you need to win the minds and hearts of the majority and that's done by being consistently awesome and doing awesome shit. As much as humans play games, meritocracy is still there aka no matter how much people dislike you, if you're awesome enough for long enough they will love you.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

True, but remember this is only the primary. She still has to win in the general.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

The district is Colorado's 1st, which is Denver. She's winning the general :D

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Glad Colorado realized that primaries are a thing, out here in Cali we're struggling in that department

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah with this shit it’s a struggle just to get someone who isn’t a Republican or a billionaire.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 34 points 3 weeks ago

She was fired from her job for opposing genocide and supporting student protestors. Take that shitrael!

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Bad time to be an incumbent.

[–] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You reckon Bernie Sanders' seat is in danger? I don't think the problem is incumbents so much as refusal to to give folks what they're looking for in a representative.

[–] cattywampas@lemmy.world 24 points 3 weeks ago

No, the anti-incumbency wave is coming from progressives and (formerly) centrist Democrats who are tired of the status quo and lack of progress. Bernie is progressive enough that he will probably not be primaried, though if he was it would surely be for a younger similar progressive.

[–] EonNShadow@pawb.social 26 points 3 weeks ago

Degette can take her Israel money and pound sand.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

For what it's worth, the late 80s to early 90s Republicans were as useless to Americans as the establishment democrats are to the left.

The conservatives that overthrew those establishment people and took control of the Republican Party (Newt Gingrich and the rest of his scumbag traitors) did so by running conservative primary candidates against sitting, long-time congressmen....and winning. They also refused to wait in line, and ran for leadership positions (Speaker, Maj Leader, Whip, and committee chairs) and won those, too.

They were also called insurgents at the time.

We really should be using the 1994 model. Pick 10 simple things we can all (70%+) agree on, and all democrats, left or center, run on the platform.

Stuff like "No corruption" "No more corporate elites bribing Congress" "No more bribes for the Supreme Court" etc. Don't get into the controversial stuff. Just pick the easy stuff, like "Everyone should get to fucking eat food and have medicine"

You'll see what an insurgency can do with that simple model.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ickplant@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

GOOD. DeGette is a POS.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

This started as a ripple in New York and we are now riding a wave of change. Hopefully this will become an unstoppable tsunami across the nation.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

15 term incumbency?!? Correct me if I'm wrong, but if each term is 4 years long, that makes 60 years, correct?

Why would anybody be in office that long?

[–] ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

That would be quite the feat since she's only 68! But in reality the term length for a member of the House of Representatives is two years.

[–] jambudz@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Each term is 2 years, so 30

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 weeks ago

YEAAAAAAAH BABY

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Get wrecked corporate stooges

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 weeks ago

Hell yeah, congrats Melat!

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

In a country where half the citizens are morons it will become increasingly more important for our candidates to focus on boots on the ground campaigning and leveraging heavily on social media. Our news outlets are so biased it’s borderline criminal what we allow them to get away with in the name of “journalism”

load more comments
view more: next ›