this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
677 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21885 readers
1356 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A new state law limits Florida communities’ aims to offset greenhouse gas emissions that are warming the global climate and intensifying disasters such as hurricanes.

Specifically, HB 1217 prohibits local governments from pursuing net-zero emissions goals. At least 10 cities and counties have implemented such policies, including Fort Lauderdale, Miami, Orlando, and Leon County, where Tallahassee, the state capital, is located. But the new law will not necessarily upend these policies, said Bradley Marshall, senior attorney at Earthjustice, an advocacy group.

“It’s certainly meant to scare municipalities and local governments from trying to do things to further net-zero policies,” he said. “Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate. Things that are adjacent to it—emissions reductions and even climate change reduction policies—on their face will not run afoul at all of a ban on adopting a net zero policy.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 15 points 2 days ago

Now, its exact impact and what it exactly prohibits is probably up for some debate.

So it has no business being a law.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Republicans really coming in clutch with that whole "small government and freedom" schtick, aint they.

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been told that only applies to the overall federal, and that states rights are important (somehow city & counties don't have those)... oddly enough these are the same places that claim that slavery wasn't the reason for the civil war.

[–] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Which state rights was the civil war fought over‽ That question usually undermines the racist state rights arguments from the new Nazi party

[–] PenguinMage@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

They make up a lot of fun things that aren't factual. I'm also super salty about how small government makes sure my local government can't do anything we want them to do through voting... but if these people acted on actual principles they'd have no one in office right now.

[–] kgbbot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Small government what?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] ours@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Fractions are non-zero: Net 10^-18^

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

net-negative goal, still not net-zero so all good!

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I love the small government party

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 197 points 3 days ago (11 children)
[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 82 points 3 days ago

Small 'brained' government

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"You WILL emit toxic fumes and you WILL like it!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Haha Florida is full of idiots

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Freedom's just another word for "admit that Christ is in charge and I am his king here on earth" to these Republican-Nazi bastards.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They aren't Christian.

The only time Christ really threatens damnation (Matthew 25), it's over the mistreatment of the poor, sick, imprisoned, and foregners.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

For their king, they sure do excel at ignoring his wishes.

[–] maturelemontree@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 days ago (8 children)

I get more worried every day shit like this comes out that the conspiracy theory that the rich want to accelerate the end of the world faster is true.

[–] Tobberone@feddit.nu 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Oil dependence is use as a of controlling the world. Renewables changes that control. Therefore Renewables must be stopped.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In the same way slave owners fought against freeing slaves as that would mean losing a whole lot of power. Oil embargoes are much less effective against a country that has 100% renewables.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

Spain has heavily adopted renewables, and it sailed through the recent oil-price shock with only minor economic ripples.

load more comments (1 replies)

It is. It might not even be part of a strategy, if you look how they compuksively jack off the torment nexus.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

New target: Net Negative

Florida the carbon sink

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 90 points 3 days ago (15 children)

how can we drive up property values

sink half of our state beneath the waves

brilliant

[–] xkbx@startrek.website 68 points 3 days ago

“We’re gonna need you to burn at least 500lbs of tires for every tree planted.”

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 55 points 3 days ago

Everyone who supported this bill is a climate criminal and should have a punishment proportional to poisoning every living person on the planet.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Orange juice Mussolini once again.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Let's go 'net-negative' policies

[–] cadekat@pawb.social 43 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I didn't think they'd be that dumb and leave a loophole for net-negative policies, but holy shit:

"Net zero policy" means any policy, program, or initiative designed to achieve a balance between total amount of greenhouse gas emitted into the atmosphere with an equal amount removed from the atmosphere.

It literally is net-zero. Removing more CO2 than you emit is absolutely allowed.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MrKoyun@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

just in time for when people actually started to feel the heat of climate change

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They really are trying to steamroll over society aren’t they. Fuck these idiot cunts

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Their state is going to be under water in ten years...

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The measure requires local governments to submit an affidavit annually to the state Department of Revenue verifying compliance. Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, signed the measure on April 22, Earth Day, and the law will take effect July 1. It states that “net zero policies, carbon taxes and assessments, and emission trading programs are detrimental to this state’s energy security and economic interests and inconsistent with the energy policy and the environmental policy of this state.”

Jesus this is bad policy. Let people find energy wherever they want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They will be net zero when they are smooth expanse of shallow water

Soon enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 days ago

Love me that freedom

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 13 points 3 days ago

next week from florida: “florida bans humans from having a nice day”

load more comments
view more: next ›