They said they take away the liberties of young people - they took away the liberties of all people.
At this point they're the ones creating false premises and the people dont have any real way of challenging that.
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2026
425 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
85921 readers
4216 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I'd turn that vote tally into a six-seven "joke", but that would require more critical thought than what every politician put into drafting and/or voting that law through Congress.
This will be a kiss of death for every site that enacts it
If they actually cared about kids, the Epstein files would have been released ages ago with no redactions. No politician cares about you or your kids.
You don't get it. This is to know who is underage and where they live. No one said Epstein's death was the end of their pedo business.
I'd be surprised if it was. The man was a symptom, not the root cause of the problem, and he certainly didn't do it all by himself.
He was the stereotypical man in the underworld who could get you anything, as long as you could afford the price.
Others would almost certainly have filled in the gap he left by now.
Ehm. He was a Mossad agent collecting blackmail material on highly influential people. He just went for the sector his targets are most interested in.
the list of "if they actually cared about kids, they would have/should have done X" is so long you could probably print it out at an 8 point font and it'd still reach from coast to coast across the width of america.
This is such bullshit. If they really cared about the well-being of children, they'd make sure they had free healthcare, free daycare, and free college/trade school.
This is ONLY about connecting our identities with our online activity. They just put a bunch of people in prison for DECADES for possessing writings that were "anti-government," so that allowed them to be classified as ANTIFA terrorists. This will allow them to do that with ANYONE who posts something they don't like.
Just because these parasites claim to have a righteous rationalization for this, doesn't mean we have to accept it. We KNOW they are lying, and the real reason is to control the adults of this country, not the children.
A lifetime of invasive surveillance is far more damaging to society, than kids discovering that men and women have different genitalia.
Situation is shit now, but I really love that people made spaces such as this one - small, and calm, without too much (of course they are) normies looking around. Hell, the best defensive mechanism against normies appears to be "pick your server" question when registering.
And looking forward, internet will pop and transform thanks to such small spaces that will emerge out of nowhere, against the stupid laws and censorship, even if access will be limited it will work as sifting for low-efforders.
I love it. Now it's time to take my meds and go to bed. 👴
yeah, good luck with that. I'll just go read a book under a tree at that point. The internet can just be a bunch of bots shitposting to each other. The day I have to have ID to use the internet is the day I log off for good.
Its been over a decade since i last sat in a hammock and read a book. Kinda excited for the internet to die now tbh.
load more comments
(2 replies)
The reason they want age verification isn’t to protect the kids. It’s to verify the entity making a request is a real person and not a bot so they can charge more for the ad space.
Also to track what everyone does on the internet so it can be used against them.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Yep why do you think Facebook is behind most of these bills.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(5 replies)
We're going to PROTECT the CHILDREN by ~~PROSECUTING Jeffrey Epstein's CO Conspirators!~~ GIVING Jeffrey Epstein's CO Conspirators ACCESS to your Children!
Now they don't have to wait for you to put your daughter into modeling or beauty contest. They can access her right through your Wi-Fi.
👆
This is one of those deals where the ALL fall in line from both parties. That's when you know the Big Fix is in. The Sociopathic Oligarchs demanded this because it not only makes them mind-boggling wealth, but it also allows them to kill those who are causing them trouble.
And the people we elected to protect us, sold us out - nearly all of them.
Fortunately thanks to VPNs I'm Canadian. I can just keep changing the settings the more and more countries implement dumb laws.
Now I'm sure some politicians have come up with a bright idea of banning VPNs and I'm just looking forward to the drama when that idea is tabled.
Obviously, I hate it, but
specified online platforms
that's a lot more weaksauce than I was expecting. I guess these old fossils don't know that there are websites based in other countries
I would highly recommend actually reading the full text of the bill. It is a lot more than what is in the body of the post.
It is not clear to me whether a site would need to be hosted in the US to fall under this law or if they would just need to be accessible in the US.
I would post the definitions but there are 7 titles under this law and 5 of them each have their own definition.
Edit: just to be clear. I hate this law too. ID requirements will kill many platforms or people will use vpns to circumvent.
Why would someone from another country follow U.S. law. Not their problem.
If they want to do business in the US then it follows that they would need to follow us law when conducting that business. It is the same reason that valve has to follow California law despite not being headquartered in California.
If that weren't the case then businesses would just move to international waters and claim to only need to follow maritime law.
It's worth noting that this isn't a distraction, this is the main event.
Never about protecting children about fighting privacy and making data collection easier.
load more comments
(5 replies)
They’re preparing for civil unrest.
Remember, it’s not about the kids.
It never was. But repubs certainly can't stop thinking about them.
There's a lot of blue seats in that image too
I’m tired man
Democrats are smiling foxes.
Surprised to see Hirono on there, thats disappointing. But Schumer, Slotkin, Fetterman, Kloubachar, Whitehouse, Warner .. the usual band of traitorous republican-lite DNC idiots is no big surprise. Thanks for the link.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Welcome back, SOPA. We didn't miss you. In fact, SOPA should've been actually dead instead of waiting to resurface for 14 years.
load more comments
(1 replies)
internet was fun while it lasted; new internet is ass anyway
This title may be cited as the Shielding Children’s Retinas from Egregious Exposure on the Net Act or the SCREEN Act.
Oh wow, they really love their acronyms!
Or the 'Killing Internet Dissent and Speech' Act. KOSA is the 'Killing Online Speech Act.'
I wonder if it'll ever be feasible to do some kind of mass, federated mesh networking to cut out the ISPs altogether.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Should we just share memes and titties outside since the normies moved online and fucked it up?
Most Americans will accept deep surveillance and the arrests that will follow, without complaints. "Nothing To Hide, Nothing To Fear"
WHAT THE FUCK. Fuck my representative fucking hell
view more: next ›