this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
1047 points (99.4% liked)

Political Memes

12305 readers
1505 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

1) Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

2) No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

3) Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

4) No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

5) No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 114 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'll never understand until the day I die how any American can watch their tax dollars used to bomb the shit out of a country, and then their tax dollars used to rebuild that same country.....and see that as a win.

Oil down, markets up, keep believing the illusion and everything will surely be ok.....

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Many people don't think. They feel.

When their in-group is going along with something, they go along with it, too. Feels good to them. It's a high.

That's it. That's the problem. It's a big part of why republicans vote against their real-life interests. They're more concerned with chasing the high of being part of the in-group. So, sure, Trump might lose a lot of money and influence and everything, but he's our tribe-mate!

It's stupid. Worse then children. Worse than dogs.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."


LBJ

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Now that I think of it, it makes perfect sense that they're always screaming "indoctrination" when left wing ideas like environmentalism or basic kindness are taught to children.... they don't think it's based on reality, just the opposing "feeling" side of their own version of reality. No facts, just feelings. And those feelings go against what their tribe says.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Propaganda, it works

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"$300 billion dollars is less than $1000 per citizen. It's not an amount that would help anyone."

  • out of touch "economists"
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

From the shit perspective of an economist that doesn't need $1,000 to catch up on bills.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Not to mention a family of 4, which would amount to $4000, which might be a 10% increase in income, not including the 30% that's already been taxed out of that $300b.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They dont count the backdoor costs of literally everything you buy in America going up 50% in price because of the war. And it wont go back down again when it ends. Same as always. Not their problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Don't forget the part where Trump backed out of the horrible deal Obama made with Iran that involved 1.6 billion dollars going to Iran.

Now it's 300 billion, extra taxes on fuel that benefit the Iranian regime, thousands of people murdered, and America's international standing even further eroded.

Art of the Deal!

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Plus the purely immediate financial cost of the war itself which I've seen estimated at around 25 billion.

And I don't know how to estimate the human cost.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Human cost shouldn't be too tricky to guesstimate.

An average US person produces about $142k/year (85k in gdp, divided by 60 % of working age), killed with about 40 years of productive life left is about $5,6 million. Add to that the lowered productivity of the close relations due to grieving and change of circumstance, as well as societal loss of morale, and you're probably looking at a loss of production of just under $6 million/life. And fractions of that depending on disability for non dead casualties (e.g. PTSD or loss of limb might be 50% depending)

The Iranian equivalent is about $400k/life, or less as civilian casualties tend to be older than prime age soldiers.

Now calculating the US cost of loss of Iranian civilian lives would be more challenging (loss of standing, loss of morale, loss of legitimacy, and follow-on actions of instability and discontent).

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure you can really put a price on the loss of 175 school kids, plus all the other civilian deaths trumps bruised ego caused.

And that's not even counting the global losses incurred due to increased oil prices, reduced production, etc etc.

[–] Brainsploosh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I mean, you evidently can, actuaries and the OBE do it all the time, and I even offered an example above.

Does it account for all of their existence - no, Is it useful to - only in a very narrow situation, is it possible - absolutely.

I'd argue the more horrible part is that some people do put a value to others' lives with even less thought than my example, which is why they're wont to bomb civilians for dubious gain.

It's easy to put a price, it's much harder to appreciate the value.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's hard to keep repeating that $300bn isn't a gift but a repayment for belligerent bombing and murder. The US won't give Iran the money for fun, but will pay to repair the damage and compensate for losses.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Until the instant Donald Trump thinks reneging on the agreement will benefit him.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Tomorrow - got it.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Which wouldn't need to be paid if the moron hadn't embarked on a pointless war. Is anyone here mad about only the money? Highly doubt it.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yes, and we spent probably even more than that in the first place to cause the damage we are now agreeing to pay for.

No matter how you look at it, the Trump administration blew hundreds of billions in taxpayer money of their own volition, to ultimately get Iran in a comparatively stronger position (note the agreement says the Straight will operate on Iran's terms, so... probably they get to levy a toll now). They don't agree to anything on any military draw down and only agreed to the same thing they agreed to with Obama...

All Trump had to do was to just do nothing after the deal under Obama and US objectives would have been closer to being met for free.

[–] Garbagio@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Don't forget, it's their money we've held.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

We'll make our GCC vassals do it since we have made it clear we won't actually fund the reconstruction fund.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago

A war nobody wanted

Correction, the people a narrow majority of USians elected to the highest offices did want that war. Some of them for decades. Because they’re in the pocket of Israel, that also wanted this war for decades.

Then those people soundly lost that war, and this is the fine you’re paying for that. Not just those people of course, but everyone.

If you wanna thank someone for it, punch the closest MAGA asshole and politely say ‘thank you’

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How else was he going to distract from raping children?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“Most powerful man in the world”. Nationalistic egocentrism never fails to get a laugh out of me.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

That sleepy pedophile is ostensibly in control of the most powerful military on the planet by an order of magnitude, so it's not inaccurate, just unfortunate.

[–] tburkhol@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago

most powerful military on the planet by an order of magnitude

Apparently, that reckoning only works if you include the nukes, which even Trump couldn't get anyone to use.

[–] VoodooMischief@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 month ago

Considering this is a topic about said military losing a war this point seems rather moot.

[–] dellish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The most powerful military! The one that couldn't keep a small ocean strait open for a small amount of time. Powerful!

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

by an order of magnitude

I think it's time to question: Which magnitude?

We know they spend a lot of billions on the army. Big numbers in comparison to any other country.

However Trump also just paid $14.2 million to have a pool guy throw buckets of paint into a pond. With no effect.

If this is the same way that money is spend elsewhere in the government, throughout different presidents sure, but if this is any kind of measurement of how the US makes investments, then I don't have to question why the military airplanes are falling down by themselves on a daily basis.

Also look at the January 6th. happening. Whether or not you're for or against what happened, you have to admit that it's pathetic that a bunch of hooligans could simply walk straight in from the street and literally shit on the table of the "most powerful" administration. It could as well have been someone with a dirty bomb.

[–] darctones@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

So, if you believe Elmo’s number, we gave them two DOGEs worth of money (if you believe the internal audits we gave them 50 to 300 DOGEs)

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

We're probably gonna have to rescind that "most powerful man" title

[–] Impractical_Island@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

He bent over before as it wasn't America's war

[–] Olmai@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Most powerful ? Did you mean: Most arrogant

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

My understanding is that the 300 billion to Iran came from private funding and not taxpayers.

Makes you wonder who's pulling the strings now, doesn't it?

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That private funding will be called "Totally Not Taxpayer Money Co."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pigup@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's simply because the ruling billionaire class believes there are too many people in the world and they simply want most of us dead. They fully understand how little money it would cost. However, providing health care other things that people need are counter productive to their goals.

They will not give it to you. They will manipulate you by teasing it as a possibility.

No cdc, usaid, hhs, etc. Nothing that keeps you alive. They want you dead, they want pandemics to thin the herd. Wars are great, they make rich richer and kill poor people, really efficient.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago

Not yet. Have to perfect the robot worker first. They push too hard and people will push back, and they know this. Fortunately people are also good at infighting among themselves and losing focus, which is what they fuel a lot.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Good news for the dems. They can run someone even more abysmal and still expect to win. They'll be putting forth Satan himself in the general election at this rate. And between Satan and trump, satan will probably win.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Absolutely you can, when your leadership doesn't feel accountable to you in any way.

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

I know. Crazy, right?

load more comments
view more: next ›