leopards ate my sajjadah
this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
401 points (99.8% liked)
politics
30100 readers
2274 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
This is genuinely fucking hilarious
"They rejected me, called me racist slurs, and demand I get out of their country before.. but surely this time, THIS TIME, they'll accept me!"
Probably thought they were cool after Trump picked Kash Patel to head the FBI.
Is he even Muslim though?
Nope, but he's brown and from that same general direction so I guess they thought they were okay.
According to Wikipedia Patel was raised in the Hindu faith. All these idiots are pick-me white worshipers.
Hussein sounds like a dumbass.
Well yea, he’s a fucking republican
I have a hard time wrapping my mind around how stupid some people are
Radical Muslims have a lot in common with conservatives.
If you read osama bin ladens 911 manifesto you can see that conservatives adopted every last one of his beliefs except for the anti-ursury stuff.
The commonality is how much they believe in the fervor of their religion and hate you for yours.
Halabi, a teacher, declined to say how she would vote in November, but said that she is a Republican and always votes.
They're still voting. Are you?
What a fucking idiot. The GOP has been brazenly anti Muslim for almost 30 years, they've always been xenophobic.
Literally what carried them to popularity after 9/11 was they siezed the chance to make the public irrationally terrified of an (all things considered) benign and innocuous minority. Their whole platform FOR THE ENTIRE 21ST CENTURY has been, "Fuck anybody who isn't us, and that goes double for Muslims."
But you see he thinks he is one of the good ones. Surely he will be accepted as the in group.
They’re just house slaves vs the field slaves to the republicans. Just as disposable, but somehow they think they aren’t viewed the same.
first party cleansing... more will follow: blacks, asians anyone looking different and once that has been dealt with anyone who deviates one iota from party line... where did we see that? Oh right Nazi, USSR, China... funny thing their biggest scare is "communism" yet they follow the same playbook
Did he just sleep through years of, "Barack HUSSEIN Obama"? The fuck, bro, they put a stank on your name like that one canned fish that should be opened underwater.
Surströmming out here catching strays.
They shoulda took the hint from how the log cabin republicans were treated.
They were on the other side with the others mocking the log cabin republicans.
"They came for the gays, but I didn't stand up because I wasn't gay and I didn't like them either because my shitty bigoted Islam and their shitty bigoted Christianity told us to hate the gays, so it was okay, but the bigotry against ME is where I draw the line"
In what should be a surprise to absolutely nobody...
Every time I hear the term "Log Cabin Republicans" or "Blacks for Trump" or "Hispanics for Trump" or about these Muslims going to GOP things, or about trad wives....all I hear is:
Jews for Hitler
...which was a real thing. People have not only not learned history, they absolutely refuse to learn from it even if they know some of these things.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lehi_%28militant_group%29
Lehi split from the Irgun militant group in 1940 in order to continue fighting the British during World War II. It initially sought an alliance with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany.[20] Believing that Nazi Germany was a lesser enemy of the Jews than Britain, Lehi twice attempted to form an alliance with the Nazis, proposing a Jewish state based on "nationalist and totalitarian principles, and linked to the German Reich by an alliance".[20][21]
Read the whole article. It's fills in a lot of the gaps.
Oh, right there's that, but I was talking about this specifically:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_German_National_Jews
The "fuck around" phase:
The Association of German National Jews (German: Verband nationaldeutscher Juden, VnJ) was an assimilationist and nationalist German Jewish organization which was formed during the early years of the rule of the Weimar Republic and during the early years of the rule of Nazi Germany, that eventually came out in support of Adolf Hitler.
The "find out" phase:
Despite the extreme nationalism of Naumann and his colleagues, the Nazi regime did not accept the Association of German National Jews as a legitimate intermediary. Following the passage of the Nuremberg Laws, the VnJ was declared illegal and dissolved on 18 November 1935. Naumann was arrested by the Gestapo the same day, and imprisoned at the Columbia concentration camp. He was released after a few weeks, and died of cancer in May 1939.[1] Most other members and their families were murdered in the Holocaust.[17]
Wow. I did not know that!
right?
There is 'ein volk' and Muslims are not in it.
“Unity drives victory.”
Yeah, they like unity, not diversity.
Uniformity.
"Sheep 4 Wolves" party stunned as...
Leopards and faces.
I mean, really, do these guys not understand just what the Republican party truly is? Same for the conservative "movement"?
load more comments
(1 replies)
My neighborhood has a lot of Bhutani and Nepali immigrants and when I was canvassing last year a surprising number of houses had the older generation as Republicans and the younger generation as Democrats.
Seems like a lot of people don't recognize that they aren't "in on it" until it's too late.
It was just weird to me. I’m wondering how someone with limited English would make that kind of decision. What were their criteria? What did they base it on?
At the end of the day I blamed it on what I blame everything on: Reagan. These were Boomer age folks who remember the gilded 80s in US pop culture.
But I would love to explore it more deeply. Is being conservative common with immigrant parents?
I'm wondering how someone with limited English would make that kind of decision. What were their criteria? What did they base it on?
"Family values", opposing abortion, limiting women's rights....
You know. Conservative.
At the end of the day I blamed it on what I blame everything on: Reagan. These were Boomer age folks who remember the gilded 80s in US pop culture.
Don't forget Marget Thatcher and the rest of 80s Conservative Ghouls.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Hey - I know Rick Scarborough.
He's a bastard.
Fun fact: I really had to search for this, academic websites are erasing a key line and I didn't bother with .gov, the reasons should be obvious.
http://www.paganlibrary.com/reference/treaty_of_tripoli.php
Article 11
Did the leopard eat your face again?
So grand, this old party...
This has to be some sort of masochism, right?
Even if he converted it probably wouldn't be enough
the "unity" they want is just for themselves to 'unite' against everyone else. if they splinter, they would lose.
view more: next ›