this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
162 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85420 readers
4016 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Inb4 all staircases look like this

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Pay your taxes, parasite

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 147 points 2 days ago (3 children)

“Significant productivity in the economy is going to raise the standard of living,” he said. “People who today have two-earner households, they’ll become one-earner households. Maybe some people who are working overtime will stop working overtime.”

I fucking love it when the exact people who make it their life's mission not to pay their employees living wages so that they can hoard wealth like an evil dragon come out and tell us that the new tech they are using to replace us will make us rich. Really fucking Jeff? How about we eat you and take it? That's the only way I see it happening.

[–] axh@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, he said two-earner households, will become one-earner households, he didn't mention* anyone will become rich**, just that one person from the household will become unemployed.

(* at least he didn't mention it in the cited fragment. I didn't read the entire thing, my time is too precious, I must waste it on writing comments instead of reading sources.) (** Of course he will become richer, but that's the obvious part of the idea and doesn't need to be mentioned)

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

I didn’t read the entire thing, my time is too precious, I must waste it on writing comments instead of reading sources.

upvote for honesty :)

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

How exactly will two earner households become one earner households without one of the earners making double the money?

[–] axh@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

Lol... By the magic of being poor

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

By becoming even poorer.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The theory here is that if everyone is twice as productive, everything costs half as much in relation to what people earn.

Of course that doesn't work unless there's heavy competition in the market for everything.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 1 day ago

Yes that doesn't happen when monopolies dominate the economy as they do in the USA. Then the monopolies just take higher margins.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I've heard many a time from many a booster that AI will lead to UBI. This reminds me of that. CEOs selling delusion in a desperate attempt to distract from the reality, always claiming better lives are just around the next corner.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

I just need a few more ~~billion~~ trillion dollars, bro, I swear. Trickle down economics work, just a few more trillions. I swear, bro, AI will bring UBI, just several more trillion dollars, bro. I swear, bro.

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

The argument is always that “they’ll have to”. And really, it’s like “Bitch, they don’t care if you live or die. “

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah we will get a UBI but they won't pay taxes to fund it and will take jobs from the taxpayers who do pay. Same story as trickle down economics and we all know how that ended.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

actually i disagree with this. money flow should look something like this:

the community (town, city) donates money to the people (UBI), they spend it to buy goods and services from companies (which make a profit that way), which then have to pay taxes to the community.

it's not companies' job to provide for people. that's politics' job.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Companies should exist to serve the community, not so a few assholes can get filthy rich.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 1 day ago

Sure, that's how it should work. But how it actually works is that Amazon pays an effective tax rate of 1.4%. Tesla pays an effective tax rate of 0%. Yes they pay no tax. Meta pays 3.6%.

The billionaires themselves pay lower tax rates than their secretaries and janitors. Both Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos have had years where they paid no tax. Larry Page and Mark Zuckerberg are paying effective tax rates around 13%.

So, yes I'd like to live in this fantasy world too. But the government can't raise enough taxes for a UBI by taking in only a fraction of the money that they themselves give out.

[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That 12 billion could have gone to health care, helping the homeless, improving schools, for research into diseases, into renewable energy sources or into making affordable houses.

But this is what we get.

Sure but how does that help the business world? Having happier healthier people that stay working age longer so they can take more wages? No! No wage! O ly work!

[–] angband@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Wages for workers are the biggest line item for most companies. Owners hates it because that money is theirs, by golly. The concept of being part of an economy never enters their stream of consciousness, only the desire to optimize sucking money out of it.

[–] captchacrunch@piefed.social 44 points 2 days ago

"You're absolutely right, I should not have built that bridge that way"

[–] protist@retrofed.com 37 points 2 days ago

$12 billion would pay for a lot of engineers...

[–] TheDuke@europe.pub 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not saying someone should but..... I would not be sad.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

You're not but I am.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah man, unaccountable black boxes designing our bridges and buildings. What could possibly go wrong?

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

At the end of the day I trust a pick and a shovel way more than this once-removed bullshit.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 29 points 2 days ago

One of the most evil people in the whole world.

[–] teft@piefed.social 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They better start putting fucking labels on AI engineered buildings and bridges because I sure as fuck am not getting inside or on one.

[–] GorGor@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago

You can buy a subscription to an ai designed database. We will always keep our paying customers safe and happy.

if your poor, try not being poor. Good luck.

[–] liking625@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They could just make an artificial general CEO and get rid of his payments altogether, stock holders would get a huge rise

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Right? Pretty interesting that perhaps one of the easiest jobs to replace is never mentioned by them.

Talking about replacing fucking engineers with unaccountable black boxes before even mentioning CEOs.

What a fucking joke.

[–] oh_@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

All that money, and he does nothing of value for society. At least the OG evil rich guys of the 1900s did charitable things sometimes.

[–] TryingToBeGood@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can hire metric tons of human engineers for that.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

But think of the savings in labor costs

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

There are so many more worthwhile startup projects you can pour $12B into.

[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They are so shocked that no one likes their fucking AI or their data centers. Yet the same people go around selling every investor on AI replacing workers. The same people go out of their way to cut every social safety net so they can get tax breaks to make themselves more obscenely rich. The same people raise prices, drive down wages, cut benefits, lay off people, and bust unions every chance they get to juice stock prices.

Gee golly, why don’t people trust us that we are making a better world? 🤦‍♂️

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What they don't realize is once they drive the unemployment rate up super high, they're gonna have an angry mob busting down their door looking to eat them.

[–] usernametbd@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Yeah they do realize. That’s why the billionaires are all building bunkers. Also the Trump admin gave 40 billion to stabilize Argentina where Milei is creating the conditions for AI corporations and the ultra rich’s network state wet dreams. The whole move is to strip mine American wealth till the bottom falls out. They come out of it rich beyond reason and we get left with the austerity.

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/argentina-legalize-non-human-corporations-ai

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Ah, but can it blow up like a mushroom cloud?

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

But i like my job

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago
[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 1 points 2 days ago

0.7% of a spacex?