this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
105 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

39798 readers
874 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ideally the answers aren't just political soapboxing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

that I actually give a fuck.

I don't.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

many people still ignore, or dont believe white privilege is still pervasive in western countries. aside from the racists, some people of those groups do not want to discuss it ever because they still benefited fom all that abuse, strip mining of resources centuries ago.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago

White people often forget (or don't realize in the first place) that, if you're a black person in USA, the police is actively looking for an excuse to put you in jail so they can make you do slave labor

[–] Overspark@piefed.social 120 points 5 days ago (6 children)

That the world is a zero sum game. That in order to have something, someone else has to go without. That in order to be great you have to drag others down.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 35 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It's the driver for misogyny, homophobia, racism, xenophobia, and so much else.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] justdaveisfine@piefed.social 109 points 5 days ago (9 children)

People tend to assume if someone is smart in one thing, they're smart with everything else too.

That's not usually the case.

[–] Today@lemmy.world 36 points 4 days ago

And also assuming that someone who's not smart in one area is not smart in any area.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Money is real.

[–] dialecticcake@lemmy.world 71 points 4 days ago (8 children)

Tax Brackets. "I got a pay raise and will now be taxed more and make less money than before the raise"

If <=30k was taxed at 25% and 30+k taxed at 30% and you go from 30k to 31k a year, only the 1k is taxed at the higher rate.

[–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 days ago

This depends on the country

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago

Benefit cliffs do exist however.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 80 points 5 days ago (21 children)

High price = high quality.

The luxury pricing model has totally enveloped markets at this point and the correlation rarely applies now.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Conservatism.

Just...all of it lol.

Being hesitant to change and wanting to temper out things and make sure things are implemented effectively is one thing. And ensuring we respect tradition and culture is another (though progressives are more in line with that lol.)

Today's conservatism is just hate and bigotry. And they don't even recognize it as such.

[–] Ogy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah this drives me crazy. I grew up where the old white men loved boating and fishing in the rivers, bringing the family out to enjoy nature. Now that it's all getting contaminated and turning gross, even the dumbest person who actually valued 'conserving' would realise we actually have to do something.

Instead, we've got billboards up and down the country trashing the Paris agreement and the old white men are only interested in attacking the other tribe. Not a hint of concern for the environment. They're not interested in conserving anything other than their social status and corresponding power.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 23 points 4 days ago (12 children)

That science is rational and objective.

In reality, the way that science works is much muddier than most realise. It's full of subjectivity, and this isn't a bug, but a feature. Intuition and tacit knowledge play a big role in basically any research (and this is why I am confident that AI can't replace scientists). Politics are also present at every stage of the process. Science is at its least objective when scientists convince themselves that they're being objective. We can't escape our biases, so we need to actively acknowledge them and embrace the subjectivity of our situated perspectives.

The problem is that talking about this is a great way to piss off other scientists. I've been accused before of "betraying the side", by a scientist who was aware that science has a disproportionately large epistemic platform (epistemic means pertaining to knowledge — basically just that as a result of the huge benefits of scientific advancements in the last century or so, science has been on a bit of a pedestal in terms of trusted expert knowledge in society. Criticising this is seen by a betrayal by some because of the concerning rise in psuedoscience and anti-scientific rhetoric.

However, I'm of the belief that some of what has driven the rise of psuedoscience is that the average person doesn't like to be told "shut up and do what the smart people say". They feel a lot of mistrust towards society (which, in many cases, is entirely reasonable, especially in the case of marginalised groups who have been heavily exploited by science and scientists),

The problem goes far beyond just science, but I think this is certainly an aspect of it. I sympathise with scientists who want to continue to have the privileged position they hold, but I don't think that's helpful in the long term.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

That they need to buy cases and cases of water in plastic bottles which they throw in the landfill instead of just drinking their perfectly good tap water.

[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Depending on your municipality, sure.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Ummm, my tap water isn't "perfectly good."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 52 points 4 days ago (3 children)

That their neurodiversity absolves them of any responsibility and the rest of the world should cater to it.

[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This is true, but at the same time it does not mean that people shouldn’t be given reasonable accommodation for their particular needs.

Many people struggle to grasp that these two ideas can coexist.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 49 points 5 days ago (10 children)

That understanding someone or something means agreeing with them.

[–] MufinMcFlufin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

On a related note, this is one of my favorite quotes: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -Aristotle

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago

That because a problem is real, any proposed solution to it is a good idea, and anyone arguing against a proposed solution doesn't want to solve the problem.

Yes, grease fires are bad. No, you should not use water to put it out. No, that does not mean I am pro-grease-fire??

[–] Angryhumanoid@fedinsfw.app 45 points 5 days ago (5 children)

So many things when it comes to police stops. There is absolutely a problem with policing in America but there is a list of things you ARE required to do when stopped by the police, whether you agree with them or not, and refusing doesn't help you and only helps them. Yes you are required to have your license on you when driving, and yes you must display and/or hand it over to police when asked. Yes they can ask you to step out of the car. Yes they can search your car if they tow it. Hell watch a few videos on YouTube of traffic stops and you'll quickly figure out what you do and do not have to comply with. And you will never, ever win an argument with the police on the side of the road, save it for court.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 38 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Math is memorizing and performing algorithms. So many adults looked at the common core math curriculum and said teachers aren't teaching math anymore because they didn't see their favorite long division algorithm taught, but memorizing and performing any particular algorithm is not what is important about learning math. Math is about taking axioms and seeing what you can build with them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] vapordays@leminal.space 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

One of the big ones: motivation.

Most people when talking/thinking about "motivation" are referring to extrinsic motivation.

Even if they make a distinction between intrinsic and extrinsic, they basically assume these add together to create "more" motivation.

However, they don't sum together. One crowds out the other, like in a neverending battle.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

i've always thought that it's really simple. there's extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation

extrinsic motivation is when somebody stands next to you and beats you with a stick when you do something that they don't like. the result is i will do the minimum slop required to fit their criteria, like when i'm asked to do the dishes, i'll just make them look clean without actually scrubbing them.

intrinsic motivation is when i see the meaningfulness of an action, at which point my body starts acting towards that goal automatically.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Either a strong religious belief or the belief that success is the result of hard work.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Photography is so much more than pointing a camera and pushing the button, even though cell phones have reduced it to that for a lot of people.

Good photography requires intention, planning, luck, skill in knowing how to compose a scene, knowledge of light and color temperature, sensor exposure, how to direct people about if people are involved, and then, in editing in post-production, skillful edits, adjusting tone, doing masking, color grading and calibration, and any other steps to perfect an image.

For me to produce one work here on this site, it can take me two or three hours, not including travel time!

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›