cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/shit/p/1154568/remember-kids
yes but also gimp is better
this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
302 points (98.1% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
69347 readers
202 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
- !seedboxes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !trackers@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !qbittorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !libretorrent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !soulseek@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Gaming:
- !steamdeckpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !newyuzupiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !switchpirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !3dspiracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
- !retropirates@lemmy.dbzer0.com
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
I find it's much easier to just stop using adobe products altogether
Sure... I can. But why would I want to? The open source options are better in almost every use case. Adobe hasn't had a compelling product for my use cases in decades.
Giving Adobe the middle finger isn't worth putting up with their malware.
it's been a while since Adobe moved from standalone projects to what they call "content supply chain" they have no interest in competing at individual product level. if you only need photoshop, there are tons of better alternatives. they only become irreplaceable if you are in the enterprise level and need things like collaboration, project management, cloud storage, auditing, governance, etc (ie. creative cloud + workfront + their AEM DAM offering).
I do consulting in Adobe products and every year their products are shittier but they still are indispensible due to inertia and integrated ecosystem
I don’t know. With the exception of a single feature, I’ve found photoshop better to use than GIMP. The one feature exception is GIMP’s wonderful “color to alpha” feature, and I always keep a gimp install around just for it.
Photoshop just seems easier to use, and more robust? With nicer effects, better filters, etc etc? At least for the features I tend to use. I’m not a professional by any means, but I tweak and composite and blend images a fair bit for my various hobbies (mostly ttrpgs).
Gimp is shit, from what I've heard krita is the Photoshop alternative, although I've used neither (big time mspainter here)
GIMP is honestly a lot better than it used to be, especially with the g'mic plugin, which is insanely powerful.
For Photoshop users, there's also photogimp, which makes gimp have a Photoshop layout and keyboard shortcuts.
Though personally I use krita most of the time, which has g'mic built in nowadays.
I've used all three products and I prefer Gimp. My wife prefers Krita. It's great to have choices.
I'm not against choice, don't know where you got that from. Personally I also use gimp
Never heard of krita, I’ll have to check it out.
It's mostly for drawing.
I mostly agree. The only Adobe product I miss is After Effects. I haven't found anything that scratches that itch.
I use Blender (and others), but it's not ideal for 2.5D effects.
Usually because the thing I'm editing was originally made with them...
But then you have to use Adobe products
I learned the foss equivalents so that I don't need to.
Adobe wants you to pirate their products so you learn how to use them instead of the alternatives.
But then you still have Adobe your PC which does nasty things to your PC, high seas or not.
Find FOSS alternatives like Gimp + Photoshop plugin (PhotoGimp), Krita, Inkscape.
Therr is no reason to be using Adobe in the 0-20 years, and definitely not in 2026.
This is how we do it: https://github.com/KenneyNL/Adobe-Alternatives#animate
Let's be realistic. None of the FOSS alternatives come even close to Photoshop. Gimp has never been a good piece of software. Not to mention, if you're doing commercial work, you need the original software to reliably work with clients and others.
I'm curious what features Adobe has that FOSS is missing
Try photopea
One of the biggest feautures missing for professionals is CMYK color space. There are some workarounds found, but it's not at the same level of Adobe and certainly not built for it.
I switched to FOSS everything and I still miss a lot of stuff even if I'll never touch Adobe again. Everything is so much harder to use and that was a sacrifice I chose to make for the sake of software freedom
In the case of GIMP it's an interface that makes any kind of sense. Have to admit that Inkscape is looking pretty damn good these days - even though it's not really a replacement for Illustrator and is more a good replacement for progs like Freehand and Coreldraw.
That's how I felt it that its more the interface than functionality. Although I've never checked and compared with PhotoGimp
What is PhotoGimp?
The latest flavor of trying to fix Gimp's UI by modifying it to look like Photoshop. These go back decades and usually end up being abandoned after a few years.
https://github.com/Diolinux/PhotoGIMP
The whole premise is flawed. Gimp should be a viable program on its own, by having a UI that actually makes sense and not by copying the market leader, because this will always mean playing catch-up, it will always mean being seen as a lesser copy.
This looks like an advertisement for adobe.