this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
457 points (97.1% liked)

Uplifting News

18998 readers
1235 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews (rules), a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news—in text form or otherwise—that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good, from a quality outlet that does not publish bad copies of copies of copies.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive: [ https://archive.is/OTfZe ]

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I know theres nicotine pouch brands with up to 200mg per pouch. Idk how this person ended up in this state but i would guess they werent a regular nicotine user before.

I use nicotine pouches myself, not trying to defend it, its obviously bad. Compared to inhaling the giga cancer smoke from ciggarettes i do still believe it is better though. Although idk which crazy people go for the "end my life instantly" strengths.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're all ramming Snus against their gums like there's no tomorrow though.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 14 hours ago
[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

'Smoke free contry'

It's about cigarettes

Bruh

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

But yet when the British government does this, Lemmites claim it's an attack on personal freedom and fascism.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (8 children)

The United States should ban cigarettes, but should continue to allow tobacco to be used in smoke-free forms.

If you want to poison yourself, that should be your choice, but poisoning others should not be allowed.

[–] vapordays@leminal.space 1 points 12 hours ago

Not a terrible idea but

The problem here is thinking the U.S. government exists to make intelligent decisions that will help us

[–] YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A gas powered car with its exhaust fumes poisons others way more than a smoker. Same rules apply?

[–] Hawk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 12 hours ago

They should. A big part of the world is moving towards that, while the US moves backwards.

[–] lechekaflan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (12 children)

The United States should ban cigarettes

Never read about the Prohibition?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 2 days ago (21 children)

In countries with solidary health insurance expenses to cover unnecessary, tobacco related cancers are paid by the whole population.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Dead wrong.
The whole population benefits from what smokers pay.
From a study in NL it shows that they generate far more than what it costs in healthcare.
And it also said should the small percentage of smokers suddenly quit and live longer, the loss of income for the state and the extra cost of them living longer and needing more care would be unsustainable.

And if you want to be selfish and not have solidarity then let's start about the much bigger cost of the SELF-INFLICTED diabetic epidemic.
They require an avg of 28 years of aid.
And almost no country wants to tackle that because of their opportunistic politicians.
Who cares about antagonizing a small percentage that smokes.
But the many sugar addicts poisoning themselves are too important for their precious votes to touch.
And those same hypocrite politicians can be seen regularly with a glass of alcohol (hard drugs) in their hand.
And as an edit, I don't want to pay for your skin cancer treatment also, should've stayed out of the sun.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That happens in the US too. We just also pay CEO salaries and shareholder disbursements.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 50 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Yeah as the article notes people have switched to nicotine pouches to get their fix. Which are better because they don't produce smoke and lung cancer, but they can still give you other oral cancers and dental diseases. If anything they're probably worse in that aspect due to being constantly pressed against the gums and lips. But at least they're smokeless.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 27 points 2 days ago (9 children)

https://www.healthline.com/health/quit-smoking/does-zyn-cause-mouth-cancer#other-risks-and-side-effects

More research is needed. Nicotine on its own is not cancerous. Tobacco is. Nicotine pouches that aren't tobacco might carry much lower risks, but there is other stuff in them.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

Nicotine on its own is not cancerous.

Man... if you really want misinformation, read Lemmy on the subject of vapes and nicotine. Everyone just copy pastas incorrect "facts".

Nicotine is carcinogenic.

and

Nicotine is carcinogenic

and

Nicotine is carcinogenic

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Not to mention the littering problem is even worse than with cigarette butts.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's somewhat nice to not risk fires breaking out, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yet they attack France for banning nicotine pouches and calling it an attack on the Swedish way of life.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

Smells copium right winger to me. But at the same time, a right wing extremist party member looking for party leader position wanted to fund "research on how feminization and declining intake of red meat correlates to increasing numbers of left leaning voters" so we cant all have brain cells ✊😔

[–] ol_capt_joe@piefed.ee 30 points 2 days ago (16 children)

People just need to rediscover pipes. Tolkien knew what was up 👍

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›