this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
875 points (98.8% liked)

196

6057 readers
684 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

Also, when sharing art (comics etc.) please credit the creators.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

genZ: a note from genX(we survived the uncanny valley of polar express) dont tell them HOW you can tell. theyll just take it as notes to try again on the next generation. stay disillusioned and let them keep failing. you owe them nothing. no enemy more vicious than apathy and anyone plaigerizing deserves as much. this is what drives our nihilism.

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

I honestly think derealization has an impact on how we view AI. Like, AI images are almost upsetting in nature for me now because it's just so wrong looking.

I know people who cannot tell AI images from reality anymore if they're photorealistic. These people have never experienced dissociation or derealization before. I tried to express what I saw in the images that was so fucked and they did not see it.

[–] ArchsageRamases@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Not hard to spot at all

You know what Gen Z, we disagree about middle hair parts, but I got to say, you're turning out to be alright in my book.

[–] grandma@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Im gen Z and AI imagery has always triggered an instunctual disgust response in me, but some are really hard to tell these days. I'm afraid we're already starting to overcome the uncanny valley at least for those cases where people put effort into making it look real

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago

Username does not check out

[–] BehavioralClam@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

First, GenZ haven't been "kids" for quite some time now, granpa lol. Its Gen Alpha, and even then they're getting older as well.

Second, GenZ and subsequent ones are completely disassosiated from the commercial world. A huge chunk of them don't like "commercial perfect", pre-baked vibes. That shows with everything: the garbagy/shitposty anti-mainstream meme culture, the "ugly" haircuts, minimally branded clothing (only area where this doesn't apply much is in music, since its kinda the other way around with how "mainstreamy" most music has become).

[–] wieson@feddit.org 41 points 1 day ago

The "not fully" makes me happy

[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI has always stuck out to me, but recently it has started becoming even more blatantly obvious. I experienced my first bout of severe derealization from a PTSD trigger the other day and now that I'm out of it, all AI images look just as wrong as the whole world did when I was derealizing. Like the AI stands out even more now that I spent a few days with a severely altered perception of the world and was questioning what was real or not. Everything is back to normal except AI. AI looks even worse now. It is taking some getting used to lol.

I also have PTSD and experience de-realization. I always found AI's realistic depictions of human people extremely disturbing. I wonder if that has something to do with the de-realization aspect. We've experienced living in a not-quite-right perception of reality, and we're experiencing that same wrong-ness when we see an AI model.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The kids aren't alright they click ads/random links on the internet.

[–] Hazmatastic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Name one demographic immune to internet advertisements

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Millennials grew up at a time where all internet ads were scams/viruses.

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 4 points 16 hours ago

They used to be and they still are

[–] Luccus@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago

The demographic that used to rely on DNS/hosts.txt-based ad blockers and then switched to more integrated solutions like NoScript, uBlock, or uMatrix.

Seeing ads (especially given how aggressive and ubiquitous they've got) is now just low key upsetting. All that bandwidth and processing power for distracting me while I'm trying to find something.

I remember seeing a auto-playing video once on mobile, checking my data and it just ate 2MB of my 100MB monthly plan. Fuck, I was so angry, I blocked the entire site.

[–] Leg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Not completely immune, but I imagine there's a non-zero amount of people in the adblocking demographic who are immune to Internet ads specifically.

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 194 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd think AI imagery is uniquely toxic for product marketing because it reads as an admission the product is worse than the picture.

We know you'll pick the most flattering angle, and the one perfectly formed unit out of 500, with a photo of a real shirt. It's the upper bound on reality, but it's still reality. If you have to hallucinate instead, you probably can't even make that cherry-picked example look good.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's simpler than that. AI is faster and cheaper.

[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 44 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And it tells me nothing. I can't tell how a shirt is going to lay over the body if the image is fake.

Faster. Cheaper. Stupider. And possibly to obscure something.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, their goal is not to tell you something, is to save budget to get a larger bonus.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 75 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can confirm, my teens hate AI and are experts at spotting it. They will dissuade me from buying anything that advertises with AI.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I want to believe this. But, I'm also reminded of how trans people often make fun of anti-trans people who claim they can always tell when someone is trans.

Your kids might spot a lot of AI fakes, but by definition they don't spot the ones that "pass", and it's impossible to know how many that is. It may even be that they over-correct and claim things are AI when they're actually not just because they have suspicious lighting, or overly eager image editing (i.e. photoshop).

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Expert at spotting does not mean 100% accurate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sneezycat@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago

In behalf of the collective, I'm appalled that you would compare us to slop, and kindly request that you refrain from this behaviour in the future. Good day, sir. /s

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Lol "Gen z".

We all have eyes, don't we?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

Most older people I know IRL can't spot generated images, my Gen Z coworkers always can.

[–] BlindPenguin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

The problem is, that we're already at a point where some images require experienced eyes to be spotted. Someone working in graphics can tell, someone who doesn't will have more trouble to differentiate. At it'll get worse, because you just know, they'll double down on improving the AI up until a point where fiction and reality becomes indistinguishable when it comes to photos.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 85 points 2 days ago

whenever I see a company using AI art for their campaigns, I automatically ignore that company

[–] Tja@programming.dev 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not sure how survivorship bias applies here?

[–] SuDmit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are aware only of those generated images that you did recognize. It's not like every image on the internet comes with disclamer for you to compare with and calculate your hit and miss percentage.

I guess it applies more to some comments than original post though.

[–] BehavioralClam@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Guy is aware of his engagement falling 40% ,thats not survivorship bias LOL Its not a "oh these planescomewith holes here" problem, but a "sir we are losing almost half our planes".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 128 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

Gen X here, and I probably can't tell without trying harder than I care to. Why "probably?" Because I've always despised marketing because it's all lies of heavy exaggeration, implication without actually claiming, and completely unrelated crap that somehow entices dumbasses to buy it (e.g. scantily clad models used to sell cars, tech, etc.).

I block every ad I can everywhere I might encounter them - and when I can't? The mute button works wonders. The harder they try to sell me, the more full of shit I know they are. I don't like being tracked, but that's practically an afterthought compared to the absolute disdain I have for marketing & the amount of bullshit I have to filter in order to glean the slightest bit of actually useful and believable info from an ad.

This sorry world seems to be run almost entirely on bullshit, and who can sling it most effectively. I look at the current White House resident as the culmination of all that is wrong in a world built on lies - lies made not only acceptable, but normal and expected all in the name of "marketing."

Fuck capitalism and the manipulative, greedy, power-tripping assholes that use "marketing" to steal money by convincing people their lives will be so much better with widget Y when they told us just last year that widget X would do the same.

No, I probably can't tell real from AI as easily as the younger set, but that's because I don't care to look at either one. It's all just an endless push to separate me from the pittance of funds I have left over after funneling the bulk of the few funds I've managed to acquire from one rich asshole's pocket to another - never staying in my account long enough to even earn a penny of interest.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago

Preach, brother/sister/non-binary sibling!

This is such a Gen X response and that is a compliment

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Same. I feel like I didn’t build a natural resistance to AI images because I so thoroughly cut out ad sources and rarely see them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

I've taught my gen alpha kids to accurately identify slop. I love watching corridor crew debunking videos with them.

[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Thank got they don't have a product created for intelligent people. Revenue would drop by 100%.

My 6 year old habitually asks me "is this AI or just Photoshop?".

[–] Zomg@piefed.world 31 points 2 days ago (7 children)

You can tell when it just looks too perfect or uniform imo

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›