this post was submitted on 21 May 2026
155 points (98.1% liked)

politics

31043 readers
1849 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 65 points 3 months ago

Unless they're actively moving to remove him from power, "revolt" is not really the correct word. They're complicit in everything else.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unusual

That's a weird way to spell "obviously illegal"

[–] DeepThought42@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

"massive fraud" would also be a good, alternative spelling

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's patently illegal. There's absolutely no defense for this corruption, but the media will keep trying

[–] hanrahan@piefed.social 27 points 3 months ago

If they're not doing anything to stop it, complicit is the correct word.

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're revolting SO MUCH that there going to do NOTHING to Stop it!

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They're revolting cause they want their cut.

[–] Ragallos@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I agree, this does make pathetic R senators, even more revolting.

[–] PedroMaldonado@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

"unusual" yeesh. Im really over how people and media treat what this sacknof rotten oranges does as anything remotely presidential.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

But they will still kiss his ass. Their knees have been worn away so much from kneeling down to this orange fuckhead in the White House, they all deserve the worst that can come to them.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 8 points 3 months ago

"Unusual" is a funny way to spell "nakedly corrupt."

[–] aarch0x40@piefed.social 7 points 3 months ago

Finally, some Republicans come to their senses. It's likely best for their political futures not to be a part of the genesis of a pedophile fund.

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Senate Republicans whine ~~Revolt~~Over Trump’s ~~Unusual~~ Illegal $1.8 Billion Fund

Fixed.

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Why are we ignoring the 1776 dog whistle?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because what the fuck does it mean and how could it possibly be worse than the face value?

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Does 1776 even count as a dog whistle? No one raised in the U.S. is going to see 1776 and not know what it’s a reference to and it’s not even anything controversial.

If they wanted a dog whistle they’d have gone with 1488 (like my HOA’s annual dues this year 😡). I’d be surprised if they didn’t discuss it but decided theycouldn’t stomach the smaller amount.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The "settlement" documents don't show any limited amount

This is the death of the federal congress legislative branch with the executive branch able to directly access and distribute usd to whoever for whatever with no oversight, tracked by secret reports to the acting head of the doj

[–] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 months ago

It's the rallying cry of white nationalists- the Confederacy. They're beating their war drums while draining the USA's war funds.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Yeeesss. Eat each other. Dooooo it.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Until the exception added that they too will be eligible as po' white victims of antifa, who is also eligible cause they are the po' white J6 traitors.

[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Senate Republicans outraged they weren't cut in on the deal.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No they don't. They fall over themselves to lick between a fat crusty pedo's toes. Gimme a break here...

Even if they did manage to have a thought, Shitler just has to call them some childish schoolyard bully names and they'll get back on their knees.

Every single Republican and Republican voter think he's their golden god. 🤮🤮🤮

[–] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

No they don’t.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

Senate Republicans Revolt over Trumps Usual 1.8B fraud. That's how I read the headline.