this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
338 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

84965 readers
3579 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 4 points 6 days ago

Do not adjust the gas tax for 33 years, do not listen to all the civil engineers telling you heavy vehicles do almost all road damage, and propose a tax with no method of enforcement. Brilliant leadership out of DC.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 87 points 1 week ago (43 children)

they want you trapped in the fossil fuel death spiral

load more comments (43 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I pay over $250/year for that privilege in Washington state. The goal is to make up for the gasoline tax I don't pay - which is fair in principle, because gas tax is used to maintain the roads we all drive on. What's not fair is that it's a flat amount. I drive less than 6000 miles/year. The electric car flat fee is approximately the gas tax a Prius driver would pay to drive twice that far. So to drive an all-electric car I'm being taxed twice as much tax as if I drove a hybrid. Insane.

[–] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I hate to pull the "You Yanks still have it cheap" card, but I just did the math for my car, assuming 10,000 km (6k miles) annually and a generous 8 liters (29 mpg?) fuel consumption. At current gas prices (2€ per liter), that's slightly under 800 Euros per year that the state collects at the pump (gas tax, CO2 surcharge, VAT adding up to at least half the price of gas). In addition, 135 € per year flat tax to have the car registered.

That said, the idea that you have to pay a penalty tax for driving a EV while the brodozers don't is, well... idiotic.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

One thing not included in either your calculations or the other person's, is we also subsidized the oil industry. So even if you don't drive at all your still paying tax for money that ends up being for oil companies and roads.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Roughly half of the money that gets spent on US roads comes from sales taxes, property taxes, income taxes, etc., and none of that bears any relation to how much driving you (we) do.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Correct, but people do get value from a public road system existing. For example, I "use" roads when stuff gets delivered to me, or when a fire truck shows up to put out a fire at my neighbor's house. My point is that when we do tax people for driving we're carefully metering it for one group of people and charging another group a flat all-you-can-drive amount, which unfairly taxes people who don't drive very much.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago (17 children)

Probably an unpopular opinion but this is to offset a federal fuel tax they aren’t getting since it’s an EV. It could be calculated better based on miles but that opens up a privacy issue.

My solution is due away with all fuel taxes and tax tires. They have a know wear rate based on miles, and don’t have any privacy issues like location tracking.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Seeing as one truck does the damage of 10,000 cars on the roads, personal vehicles should not be paying the lion's share of road money.

So it shouldn't matter the type of tire.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those tires are much larger so you could just tax them more. Plus a pneumatic tire can only hold so much weight which is why they are 18 of them on a huge truck. Not to mention more load causes more wear on the tire so they go through them quicker. I mean it’s not perfect, lots of things affect tire wear like road surface, road smoothness, alignment, etc. Maybe you keep the diesel fuel taxes and just tax tires on passenger cars. Maybe give a tax break to small diesel cars to offset the double tax. Just brainstorming…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I don't mind a road tax. I prefer it over tolls. We already pay gas taxes for infrastructure. My issue is that it is a set price. I honestly think it should be based on the price and weight of your vehicle, and your annual mileage. A subcompact for your daily 20 minute commute is less damaging to the road than a truck traveling 70k miles per year is.

My other problem, no guarantees that it will be used for infrastructure.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Habahnow@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Interesting points to me are the fact that this 130 fee is:

  • more than what the average fuel consuming car pay (70-90)
  • Is on top of what many people already pay in state taxes to drive their car
[–] ITGuyLevi@programming.dev 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

As pissed as I get at fees, electric cars don't typically pay a gas tax, the taxes we levy on fuel pay for road maintenance so that fee should be for road repairs. In my very small car I pay around $1.80 or so each week in federal fuel tax (not sure what I pay to the state, but those combined is very likely over $130/yr).

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

The gullible part is thinking the federal government fixes the roads with your money at all. More than likely it'll go to Israel.

I bet the pick ups will pay less than an EV driver and are one of the main causes of road damages

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Electric cars pay electricity tax. Gas cars pay gasoline tax. We don’t need to tax electric cars even more.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's never an option to tax the megacorporations that force us to use public roads that they don't pay for to get to work is it?

Good ol corporate socialism. Privatize the gains and socialize the losses.

Tax the megacorps more and use that to maintain roads and expand public transit providing an actual choice for people rather than forcing the individual to buy a car, pay for maintenance, for registration, for fuel, for a license, for tolls, all just to get to work.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

This is climate change denial in action. Any normal country would incentivize people to switch to EVs, not the opposite.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

its to shore up OPEC countries, the ME, and israel by extension all that sweet oil money going into pockets of politicians .

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] realitista@lemmus.org 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What about all the subsidies we pay on gas? Maybe get rid of those if you want some revenue?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bluyonder@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Arkansas already charges an extra $200 annual registration fee for electric vehicles.

[–] JPAKx4@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's usually the case, as electric vehicles don't pay taxes on gas which is used for roads. Basically a system to make people who drive pay for the roads (and people who drive more will pay more as well).

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sam Graves, Federal Congress Republican of Missouri, Wants You To Pay $130 A Year Just To Drive An Electric Car

FTFY

[–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

When they tried this last year it was scrapped because there was no practical way to collect it. Are we going to have a national car registry? That would take more money than it would collect. If they just ask a question on tax filing, I'm just going to lie.

[–] nahostdeutschland@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago (9 children)

How are you Americans doing car registration? As someone from another country it sounds a little bit crazy to not have a national car registry. Is this on the state level? And if someone from Texas is caught speeding in Arizona, police has to as there for the ID of the owner? Or is there no registry at all? And why shouldn't states be able to collect a tax from their citizens?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] dogs0n@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I dunno how this works, but I'd assume this national car registry already exists at the DMV because you have to register your car to drive it, no?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

But is $130 actually fair?

Well, a flat fee doesn't take into account vehicle weight or annual mileage, which the gas tax more-or-less does. And the road maintenance cost is a function of those two things. A flat fee would penalize drivers of infrequently-driven small vehicles.

But...I suppose that gathering that data would also add some privacy concerns and costs, like the government needing to record how many miles your vehicle has traveled in a year.

EDIT: The really obnoxious thing is that everyone else is grabbing movement data on vehicles to make money off. Automakers via integrated cell radios. ALPR network operators. I assume that charging station operators do too


fast DC connections like NACS transmit the vehicle's VIN, and I'd be very surprised if charging companies aren't monetizing that data.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You could tax tires, it avoids all the tracking while still distributing road maintenance costs based off actual use of the roads.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's an interesting thought.

thinks

Tax revenue would be less-frequent, and there might be potential to create a misincentive to encourage people to unsafely drive on threadbare tires longer than they otherwise would. But I could see that being done.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Or ... we could just not tax electric vehicles, and call that a subsidy to encourage the more environmentally friendly option.

If, at some future point, electric vehicle adoption becomes so widespread that it becomes difficult to provide road maintenance because gas taxes aren't being paid anymore, then you can find a different funding source for it. Maybe just fund it out of the ordinary general tax fund. Or even go really crazy and raise taxes on billionaires by two hundredths of a percent.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Won't you pay a little extra to save the planet? No? What a scumbag you are."

Proceeds to dump toxic waste into a river to save $1200

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago

proceeds to pay $100,000 in lawyer fees to fight a $5,000 ticket for dumping.

[–] oopsgodisdeadmybad@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I don't know the correct answer to this exactly, but given that I've only driven my car (hybrid) about 4k miles total over the last 2 years since I got it (April '24), and paid less (but not $0) in gas tax, but still got hit with the full $130 extra fee is absolutely infuriating. I hadn't even owned it a full year yet but still had to pay a non pro-rated amount (my previous car was a regular gas car).

I'm basically paying almost 6x the rate per mile since I drive so little. I'm the one stuck paying extra because I can't afford to drive enough to justify the full amount, and subsidizing some high mileage driver out there.

I realize tracking mileage has privacy implications, so I don't know a perfect solution, but it fucking SUCKS to get ripped off this hard. While being on disability due to injury and other surgeries, too. I mean I'm still building strength and endurance back to be capable of working again, preferably this year, but I'm the meantime, taxes are fucking killing me.

At least with an EV I would have 0 in gas taxes instead of paying the "not paying gas tax" fee on top of the gas tax- while gas is almost $5 a gallon.

So much bullshit.

Edit- I just noticed that my state does offer a mileage based option, but you have to plug a doodad plugged in the ol Ob2 port or whatever it's called. And then use an app to upload your mileage information, which I believe happens more than once a year, which is weird and more privacy breaking, given that registration is only assessed once a year (or less, if you pay 2 or 3 years ahead). That gives them not only your total mileage for the year, but which month you got those miles in.

I assume per month, but I don't actually know. I assume it's once per year, because they added that in addition to using that device and the app, that you have to annually send a photo of your odometer to what they actually called "true up" your info.

If they're relying on that photo to be the most reliable part, then that should be the only part needed. It's basically screaming in our face that the device and app is definitely just for "spying purposes that we actually make money on".

Personally I don't want to even give them the photo, especially since it's about a $150 fee a year. So given that I drive less than a quarter of whatever is normal now (I've heard "normal" is 10-15k miles per year, but I've only heard it from my parents, so I don't actually know- and again I've gotten about 5k over 2 years), I see this as being assessed it to be a little under $40 for the actual fee, and a little over $100 for the "keep your nose out of my business" fee.

[–] jmill@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

I saw someone suggest taxing tires instead of gas, which does seem more equitable, but it would be a big hit on an already expensive purchase.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›