this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
163 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

21504 readers
1147 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Battle" is usually meant figuratively when fighting wildfires.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] too_high_for_this@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well, as far as damage locations go, it's about as innocuous as you could hope for... Rear rudder, thankfully missing the actual control linkages. It just tore some aluminum, that's all.

I wonder if the pilot was ex-military, I don't think I'd recognize the sound of a bullet striking the plane. Though I would certainly also return to the airfield after a birdstrike, any impact is a hazard.

Sure was a dick move though... I mean to shoot at emergency response workers, they're trying to save lives and homes.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Some people I know have remained friendly with some conspiracy theorists since Covid (I just stopped interacting when they told me I’d be dead by 2022 because I received the vaccine) and I’ve heard that one of the current theories is that the government is starting the wildfires for some reason.

[–] AskewLord@piefed.social 5 points 1 hour ago

forced burns are a forest fire management tactic.

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's to force states to start raking their forests.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

What's worse is the thought that forests can't take care of themselves absent human involvement. These huge fires are because humans artificially prevented the natural cycle of fires for more than a century. Now with so much built up overgrowth, it is out of control.

[–] Little1Lost@gehirneimer.de 3 points 5 hours ago

tecnically the us gov does start some (in)directly through cuts in funding

[–] NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca 21 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Other countries often send help to places battling forest fires. You’ve got to wonder if that will give them pause when the pilots need to be concerned about being used for target practice.

[–] whimsy@lemmy.zip 36 points 12 hours ago

The fire is shooting at us!

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 59 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Shit, even the fire have gun now!

[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 28 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (3 children)
[–] Vandals_handle@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

that all changed when the Fire Nation attacked

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 12 points 10 hours ago

In Minnesota, you also gotta watch out for bear arms.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

It was right there!

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 14 points 12 hours ago

Who the hell armed the blaze?!

[–] rem26_art@fedia.io 9 points 11 hours ago

taking the 'fire' in firearms a little too seriously