this post was submitted on 15 May 2026
216 points (95.4% liked)

Not The Onion

21545 readers
880 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"—nick—weird—happened twice—"

only posting this now because apparently nobody has posted this yet and I just found out

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago
[–] TribblesBestFriend@startrek.website 82 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why can’t we have cool things once in a while ?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I just typed up a funny comedic reply. Then I read it back, and it came off wayyyyy too aggressive. It came off like I was just being an asshole for no reason. So I deleted it, and tried to workshop it. I wanted something that I could say mean spirited things, in a joking way, but it came off waaaaay more mean than it should have been.

So instead, imagine I sent a reply, where I was mean, but you could tell I was joking about the fact that we can't have nice things because we're all plebs, and not the billionaire ruling class. And then we'd laugh while giving them the finger.

Ok, all caught up? Cool. Back to work, dickhead!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Didn't have to get all personal about it at the end, bro. I was already having a rough day, now you're just attacking me. :(

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

You can, this was mostly overturned

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This entire saga has been so frustrating to watch unfold. Portions of the judiciary seem absolutely hellbent on denying court ordered financial restitution to the families. It’s not like Alex Jones has even put forward sound legal arguments. My tinfoil hat theory on this is the judges putting up roadblocks are doing it not because of alex jones or free speech, but because it has a connection to guns. They don’t want something even tangentially related to guns to get a win.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I haven't followed the case, are they Trump judges?

[–] KnitWit@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

The lower court judges that have been involved in the cases have largely been fine and just, but once you get to the appellate level it has become evident how partisan our court system has become. I should note that the fifth circuit (one of if not the worst in terms of partisanship) has now denied standing in this latest appeal by Jones, so potentially this is all coming to an end.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So the families of Sandy Hook can’t get paid because of reasons??

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because you can't get justice without having power.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

When you make school shootings look bad, you make America look bad.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

America is more than capable of looking bad without anyone's help.

[–] tonytins@pawb.social 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Given this all happening in Texas, I'm not surprised.

[–] thorhop@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Two places you don't accept holding court: London and Texas.

[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

London, Ohio? Or a different London?

[–] Typhoonigator@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Why, is there a second one somewhere?

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] CanadianCarl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 days ago

I was thinking of going to the ComicCon in that London.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

There's one in Texas

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

AJ won't give up. Ever. This - not just the site but the narrative he developed around the trial and the attention he gets for it - is his livelihood, he needs to keep it up no matter how ridiculous, petty and pointless.

I hear it's only a small, partial win anyhow.

No matter for AJ: one more time he's getting media attention.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

He can't give up, because that would mean that he has to start giving all of his money to Sandy Hook families, and he will not do that.

[–] ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn't he already declare bankruptcy?

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And it was declared that his declaration was not sufficient to ignore the bill. That's why Infowars was sold in the first place

[–] MacGuffin94@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Right but they just got that mostly overturned