this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
334 points (97.7% liked)

World News

56060 readers
1857 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perestroika@slrpnk.net 11 points 16 hours ago
[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 9 points 21 hours ago

Well gee golly.

A Russian cargo ship carrying nuclear components for North Korea has a 'surprise accident'.

I can't think of anyone who might have wanted to arrange that accident, can you? I mean surely everyone wants North Korea to have nuclear stuff... Oh wait...

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 4 points 23 hours ago

"You are experiencing a car accident"

[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 93 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Root cause analysis determined that the reason for the incident was that it was a ship built in Russia.

[–] Astronut@lemmy.zip 62 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] DiarrheaSommelier@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 day ago

Since it's a Russian ship, I'd like to point out that that is very typical.

[–] nailingjello@piefed.zip 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is something like that very typical?

[–] Nautalax@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Idk for other ships but their aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov became a meme for always being down for maintenance and/or on fire

[–] PodPerson@lemmy.zip 2 points 22 hours ago

Oh no - not typical at all.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would they go the long way round?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Does not make sense for alleged cargo. Just wait till summer and use arctic route, or use a train.

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 3 points 10 hours ago

Pretty much, I mean North Korean troops were going by ship to Vladivostok, so why not just overland rail to Vladivostok then ship to NK?

Seems much easier than sending it around the world through potentially hostile waters

[–] waterSticksToMyBalls@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Those ship attacking killer whales are now a nuclear super power.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

killer whales with nuclear powered lasers.

[–] jasoman@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

The going to add lasers

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Now that's how you renege on a gift!

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Apparently they just do that sometimes.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oddly, the bottom of the ocean is a pretty good place to store a nuclear reactor. Which is lucky because Russia already had several of them down there and there are two American nuke subs on permanent patrol.

[–] fake@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's hardly going to be fuelled

Actually the ocean contains billions of tons of uranium

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The orcas have only been going after small sailboats (the kind small enough for a middle-class family to afford, if they own it instead of a house and live aboard full-time). They aren't the class conscious anti-oligarch crusaders everybody wants them to be.

[–] thallamabond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The phrases "middle class family" and "live aboard full-time" do not sit well with me.

[–] NannerBanner@literature.cafe 3 points 10 hours ago

A small boat is (well, was, these are probably ~2008 prices I'm remembering) cheap. It's probably been 'patched' by marinas and such, but at one time you could get a small sailboat for 10-20k, and get electricity+dock space for a tenth of the price of an apartment's rent. You would be living in ~200 square feet at best (and probably less than that) but it was doable. For a family of three, you could probably swing that lifestyle with a 40k boat, which is still well under a typical house. Again, it would be ridiculously small, but it's possible. A friend of mine grew up on a sailboat like that.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I know a couple who both cashed in all their retirement to buy a boat and sail from place to place; their kids are 'home schooled' on the boat. they are not rich by any stretch, but they're living their dream. not my idea of fun but, eh? the husband now just does odd marine jobs to keep their house floating. I respect their desire to live their way.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

imagine how impressive the orcas that did this are.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

we should give the orcas torpedoes... and a list of targets lol

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

they have war bears, giant squids, dolphins, and now orcas.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Old news

don't know why im geting downvotes, this is old news.

[–] modus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Yeah, isn't this from last year? Or did it happen again? That photo looks familiar.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Let me just leave this here:

South Korea’s ADD showcases new Supercavitating Torpedo at MADEX 2025

ADD said that the development of this supercavitating torpedo is currently about two-thirds complete, and that after further maturing the torpedo’s stabilization control technology, it will finally secure the design and testing technology of the test body.

...The MRXUUV (Mission Reconfigurable eXtra-large Unmanned Underwater Vehicle) currently under development by ADD could serve as testbed.

According to an interview with the ADD chief researcher, the supercavitating torpedo displayed at MADEX 2025 is an actual tested torpedo, designed in size to fit in a UUV, capable of being guided (in the initial phase of the launch, at low speed), and is being developed to sink enemy main surface ships with ultra-high-speed kinetic energy without a warhead.

The publicly released timeline doesn't line up, but the motivations do.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

What would a South Korean torpedo two-thirds of the way through development today have anything to do with a Russian ship sinking off the coast of Spain a year and a half ago?

I’d wager this was Ukraine’s handiwork using conventional or drone weapons.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

The reactors were bound for North Korean subs giving a pot of mitivation for the South Koreana. The Spanish claimed evidence of a supercavating torpedo strike.

Also the Ukrainians are rarely this mysterious when they blow something up. They are openly at war with Russia and thus don't need to be.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (5 children)
  1. the article is a year old, so those statements were made at least a year ago, 2) militaries aren't always super up front about their weapons programs timelines 3) the statement specifically said that even though it was "2/3" of the way through development, it had been tested. How do you know this wasn't the test?

It could have been Ukraine, but Ukraine does not have super cavitating torpedoes, so if that's the case the reporting on those and the shape charges must be wrong.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago
  1. militaries aren't always super up front about their weapons programs timelines

Not only this, but they also love to find reasons to test new weapons designs in real situations. Testing in a lab is great, but you'll never know the real effectiveness until it's used for real.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think a limpet mine is a far more likely explanation, why risk such a heavily classified piece of technology falling into enemy hands?

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

To prevent the literal unpredictable madman neighbour with a mortal vendetta against you from getting a nuclear reactor.

Also, Russia already has super cavitating torpedoes, and there's not necessarily that much to learn from their pieces after impact.

Not saying a limpet mine isn't likely, but this also feels like exactly why SK is developing those torpedoes.

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MRXUUV is a comically terrible acronym. Why even bother using the "x" from "extra" if you're going to make an acronym that reads like a silicon valley pyramid scheme?

[–] prettybunnys@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe it makes more sense to a first language Korean speaker/reader and we’re too English language to get it?

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Unfortunately paywalled. Is this a delayed report on the one which was hit by a supercavating torpedo off the coast of Spain a few months ago or is this another sunk russian ship with reactors bound for North Korea's submarine program?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is about the ship, which was sunk off the coast of Spain. However the supercavating torpedo thing is not really proven to my knowledge. It would be very interesting, as Ukraine does not have that technology.

[–] Smaile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

South k does, they 100% intercepted that. To cock block NK from geting those reactors.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

Depends on whether you consider December 23, 2024 "a few months ago".

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

CNN did a video recently about the one off Spain in the last couple of days. This is probably that one.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago

Whatever the cause of the initial blast was, Russia definitely scuttled the ship rather than have anyone else know what it was carrying.

Lots of maybes in this headline

load more comments
view more: next ›