this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
699 points (98.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

11487 readers
1617 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Burninator05@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

And no mater which situation you find yourself in you have unreasonable amounts of sandwiches.

[โ€“] Kolanaki@pawb.social 5 points 10 hours ago

What am I not getting with this joke? ๐Ÿ˜•

[โ€“] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 14 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (6 children)

...Do parents have gender-neutral pronouns?
aside from you know... "parent"

Is that it? That's all we have?

[โ€“] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Sometimes my kids call me by my first name trying to get a reaction out of me, but I don't care. That should work. I don't think "mom" and "dad" are even pronouns, are they? Proper nouns in the direct context ("Hey Dad, how was your day?") and regular nouns in the common context ("My mom said to tell you hi."), so I'm not sure this is a thing.

[โ€“] 5too@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

We used "momdad" when we just needed one of them.

[โ€“] BigDiction@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago

Parental Units.

[โ€“] TAG@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

One of my irritations is that we do not have good language to talk about non-binary people.

For example, instead of a brother or sister, you talk about a "sibling". It just sounds so impersonal. Instead of saying something that shows your love for a family member while acknowledging the fact that the person does not cleanly fit into either of the gender boxes, it sounds like gender erasure. Like the person is too concerned with social pressure to refer to their relative by an incorrect gender but too proud to use the correct gender. Or maybe it is similar to a gay person talking about his "partner" to leave a little bit of ambiguity about his sexuality.

I am not saying that people should hide their gender identity, just that the English speaking community needs to find better terminology to use when talking about them.

[โ€“] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago

My sister and I occasionally refer to each other as "sibling" using conehead voices.

[โ€“] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The term kin can work, sure you will sound like a hick but who cares.

[โ€“] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

I do use "kin" sometimes, but I don't think I would in a parental context. Interesting, though. Maybe it's just me that thinks of "kin" as being a gender non-conforming form of "brethren". Usually I use the word in a collective sense, too, as in, "All my homies love and support their trans kin."

[โ€“] Jrockwar@feddit.uk 4 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

What for? If it's plural you can use "parents" just fine, and if you're referring to one of them, you can always use "my dad" or "mom".

I guess it could be useful to have something equivalent to "my parent" that is gender neutral and it doesn't sound as dry. But then again it doesn't allow you to differentiate which one you're talking about. I've seen people with gay parents use "dad" and "papa" or something along those lines, which solves that problem but isn't gender neutral.

Language evolves to serve a purpose or solve a problem, and I guess we haven't had this linguistic challenge before.


(Leaving aside that these are technically not pronouns, but I don't think that's the point of the conversation and we don't gain much by debating grammar)

[โ€“] botbot@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[โ€“] Phantaloons@piefed.zip 1 points 58 minutes ago

Nah, but yeah tho.

[โ€“] Ziglin@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

I would like to note that while rare non-binary and intersex parents do exist and might not want to be called mum/dad however there is not really a nice gender neutral alternative to my knowledge.

[โ€“] lauha@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I live in bilingual are and a lot of kids use mom or dad from different language if parents are bilingual. For example other is dad and other papa

[โ€“] inari@piefed.zip 21 points 19 hours ago

"Go ask your dad" is what would create a loop here

[โ€“] dannii_montanii@kbin.earth 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[โ€“] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.zip 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Its unlikely that among 4 poly people not one of them is nonbinary

[โ€“] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 9 hours ago

unrelated: that double negative is throwing me for a fucking loop, but the coffee hasn't kicked in.

I think "It's unlikely that in a 4 person polycule that at least one of them isn't nonbinary" is the better way to phrase it. I'm not trying to be pedantic here. I'm just wrestling (aloud) with the structure of the sentence.

Related: Why would a polycule almost always have a non-binary member? I'm not up to date on this stuff, but I could see a bi polycule working, or something like that, with them all aligning with their typical (i use this word lightly, for lack of a better one) gender.