this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
759 points (97.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39706 readers
5201 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Error in the text: 1000mW laser with 532nm wavelength which is green light.

1000nm light is infrared.

Cross posted in https://lemmy.ca/post/64612634

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Murse@slrpnk.net 21 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The likelihood that you're going to get caught anyway, this might be a better situation for an "act like you belong" approach.

Hi-vis vest, hard hat, a ladder, couple safety cones, and some tools. Just waltz right up and run a half-inch drill bit through the lens. Pack up and move on to the next one.

[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

There's a pretty great video of what happens when you fuck with a police heli

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 15 points 3 hours ago

Everyone knows that construction workers famously never have their phones with them so complete the look by leaving yours at home.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 53 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, fuck flock. But really, truly, do not do this.

I don't give a damn about the Flock cameras. Set them on fire or steal them and sell them for scrap for all I care. But a laser powerful enough to quickly fry a camera sensor is going to be an extreme danger to human eyes. These type of lasers can be acquired fairly easily, but you don't want to be using them in public outdoor spaces. At these power levels, even reflections of laser light can be damaging to human eyes. And when you shine laser light on a solar panel or camera lens, some is going to be scattered in random directions. Sure, you can make sure to wear laser safety goggles while doing this. But random bystanders won't have that luxury.

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

So very much this.
These things should not be available to buy for the general public, or anyone without safety training and equipment.
Remember: Don't stare into laser with remaining eye.

Edit: It is true that there are lasers that can damage camera sensors and not eyes, but they are infrared outside of the visual spectrum, and absorbed by the water content of the human eye. BUT STILL DO NOT USE LASERS OUTSIDE OF CONTROLED ENVIRONMENTS

[–] stray@pawb.social 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently they can also set dark objects on fire and melt plastic, which has a lot of potential for unintended consequences.

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago

Can't tell if you're trying to talk me out of or into buying a laser.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 9 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

or you can saw of the pole its attached to, like they did elsewhere, or throw objects at it to break it.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 hours ago

Old school shit is usually the best shit.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 87 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

If you hit an airplane they will try very hard to track you down. If you hit too many cameras they will probably try to find you, too. They will use your purchase history, social media post history, and location, for instance. So, best to buy the laser somewhere far from where you use it, AND pay cash if you can.

Not that I recommend this, but if you want to try, be smart about it. And, be careful.

[–] lemming741@fedinsfw.app 3 points 5 hours ago

Sounds like a flea market purchase

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

Purchase history is harder to check than you'd think. Use a giftcard on AliExpress and anyone outside of the federal level will be lost.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

That's the problem with this really. You gotta be really careful you're not caught on camera beforehand, and they have a lot of cameras. So unless you can just walk out of the woods near one and disappear the same way, you're likely gonna have a bad time.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 9 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I think its horrible that so many things are happening to us from our own government. They are supposed to be on our side but that was long ago now.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

A camera is a camera no matter the brand. Take a walk around your neighborhood and imagine the cone of sight each one has, eventually you'll see one that doesn't have another watching. From there it's just a game of mine sweeper.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You also have to be able to fry the camera without it being able to record you before you're successful. Can you burn out the sensor from an angle of attack that still has you out of view? Maybe, maybe not. And how will you know for sure?

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I would think probably not. Light paths are typically reciprocal, ignoring scattering or dispersion.

In other words, if photons from your body aren't hitting the camera sensor, how are photons from the laser going to hit the camera?

Unless you have an insane laser that shouldn't be used outdoors, I doubt there will be damage from an indirect hit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] slowmolaggins@thelemmy.club 54 points 19 hours ago

In my town, roads have potholes deep enough to cause damage to cars. Many intersections have been down and operating as 4 way stops for months. But somehow there's money in the budget to do this shit. I think some vandalism might be in order to teach priorities.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 22 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

It would be interesting to train an image recognition algorithm on detecting flock cameras, build a raspberry pi with two servos and put it all in a nice box to carry around. For research purposes of course.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

It would be interesting to train an image recognition algorithm on detecting flock cameras

Or just query nearby bluetooth devices:

https://www.ryanohoro.com/post/spotting-flock-safety-s-falcon-cameras

EDIT: Also, those things read bumper stickers in addition to license plates. I've often wondered if they check for injection attacks between character recognition and storing it in their database.

Another edit: An attacker wouldn't even need to put the sticker on their own vehicle. And a $20 thermal receipt printer (a "cat printer" as they're known because the most popular model has cat ears and a cute cat face on it) can print on rolls of adhesive paper. I honestly wonder why no one uses them for sticker-based graffiti already. Probably because thermal prints don't last long in sunlight.

[–] Spezi@feddit.org 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Just use a brother P-Touch with the 24mm rolls. They are pretty weather proof from my experience.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I want to make this clear: I was not speaking about myself, but a hypothetical attacker. I don't even know if such an attack would be effective.

That said, the rolls on the cat printer are 57mm and would probably be easier to resolve on a moving vehicle, and it would only need to last long enough to be read by one camera. Plus, the P-Touch doesn't look like a kitty cat.

[–] beyoublahaj@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You might find this interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_F4rEaRduk&t=644

Edit: wrong timestamp

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Just put a bit of gaffa tape over the camera

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

those are easy to remove, better to make it cost more for them to replace it.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Whats the coat of labor though?

I bet the charge for covering a camera with tape is a lot less than destruction of property.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 110 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

Yall make sure you're not visible on another camera when you try this - it's not like they won't be able to figure out when and where you were when you did it. FLOCKs are usually in high camera-density areas like parking lots and strip malls and such, and there's a lot of pressure to address vandalism against the surveillance apparatus.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

No one on lemmy is ever going to do this anyway.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 126 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

I know that Xwitter is usually a reliable source, but 1000nm is outside visual range and therefore not green. Green lasers in the ~500nm range will absolutely damage a camera sensor, but you'll need good aim and sustained illumination.

[–] degenerate_neutron_matter@fedia.io 93 points 22 hours ago (12 children)

If you actually want to do this, look at the NUBM44-V2 laser diode. 7 watts of output power and around $30 on eBay. Another $50 or so for a driver, heat sink, and lens and you can burn out cameras in seconds (you can also burn out your eyes so a good set of laser goggles is essential).

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 41 points 22 hours ago (3 children)
[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 20 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

"My eyes! The Googles do nothing!"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 13 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I mean the whole point of flock is that they can track you everywhere. Destroying their cameras doesn't destroy the footage.

If you destroy their cameras they will just trace your movements backwards until they find a way to identify you.

You need to find a way to do it surreptitiously so it's not clear who is doing it, and they won't be able to figure it out by process of elimination by seeing who is commonly present when a camera iss destroyed.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

If this were really true, there would be no crime right now. Nancy Guthrie has been missing for months now despite the perpetrator being caught on camera in an affluent neighborhood where there would be many Ring, Flock etc. cameras. These companies overpromise and underdeliver as they all do. Their main purpose is get people to pay them. They are much less competent than they claim to be.

[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 22 points 15 hours ago

The easiest way to best an opponent is to always assume they have the upper hand. If flock cameras are half as good as they say they are then approaching it as if it were twice as good means it will be good enough to match.

Being over prepared will never cost you as much as being under prepared.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Possibly, but I don't wanna risk my freedom on them being incompetent rather than corrupt.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I just want to counter their propaganda is all

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›