this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
202 points (99.5% liked)

politics

29691 readers
2389 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Weimar Republic, folks

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago

They don't give a damn about their reputation

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 57 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

People don't fear for their lives enough these days.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Won’t someone rid me of these meddlesome judges?

[–] lumpyluggage@lemmy.world 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Do they have secret service protection too?

[–] Mcdolan@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 hours ago

Idk, a huge subset of Americans fear for their lives everyday right now with ICE being like the third most funded military in the world.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Wild considering public servants addresses are typically public too.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Maybe they change that next.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 26 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It said Florida and Ohio passed prohibitions on gerrymandering by referendum but they were flagrantly ignored by their legislatures (which are heavily gerrymandered.)

That their state courts haven't stopped the illegal maps as per the new laws. Florida has only a statutory law referendum, Ohio passes constitutional amendments, which can't be undone by the legislature without a supermajority.

But go figure, the legislature doesn't feel like they need to honor their state constitution where all of their authority resides.

There is a link in the article to FL, but not the Ohio thing, anyone know any more about this?

[–] troybot@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

Closest thing I know of is 2024 Ohio Issue 1 which was an attempt to create a citizen led committee that would draw the maps. A deceptive opposition campaign framed it as "requiring gerrymandering" and the Republican Secretary of State changed the ballot language to read that it would remove protections against gerrymandering. It was defeated, so I guess the article is correct if you go by that ballot language that was voted down.

So yeah there are protections against gerrymandering but only for the party who has the supermajority.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 30 points 11 hours ago

Well Monday is on its way. I don't expect the VA legislature to take this one as over and done. A mandate of the people supercedes the court.

[–] digitalFatteh@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago

And yet still not enough for a general strike.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

well there's one upside to the low number of seats.

[–] meowmeow@quokk.au -2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yawn, I’ll say it again: October is martial law. You can do something now or fail doing something then. Me? My emigration will be complete by then. I’ll be just fine. Be sure you’re mad at the right people, and that’s not me.

Have the day you voted for. ✌️

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yawn, I’ll say it again

Ok, 1 day old account spreading doomerist defeatism.

[–] meowmeow@quokk.au 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Hey bud, guess where telling the truth gets you? Tagging you as “maga”

[–] odelik@lemmy.today 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Go right ahead. My comment history will dictate otherwise, but again, you're account age combined with your behavior here, makes you seem suspect.

[–] meowmeow@quokk.au 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You have the right to be wrong about things.

Edit: also, none of your comments suggest you didn’t vote for him at least once. You sound pretty “center” to me. 🤮