this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
5 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

47726 readers
1 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wuphysics87@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Read. Write. Execute. RWX. I'm going to piss some people off. Here goes: you are wasting your time if you watch videos. At all. A video moves at the pace it plays. It is linear. You can't jump around easily. Reading? You can jump wherever you need immediately. You can have multiple sources at once. If you use a book, yes a physical book, you learn where things are and jump right to them. Read

Write down a paraphrased version of what you read. Do not copy. Include references so you can return to source if needed. Note taking is a skill. Your notes should be organized in a way you can skim what you wrote as easily as the sources themselves.

Execute. You don't learn anything unless you do it. I've had too many students who watch Khan Academy, and think they understand it when they haven't done it. They don't score well on exams. Not my fault. I told them they have to do it to understand it.

RWX. I await the flame war I just started with the video people.

[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I post my ignorant opinions somewhere. There’s always someone who will correct me with correct information.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would you say Poe is cunning, and likes ham?

[–] jbrains@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

~~Would~~ Ward you say Poe is cunning, and likes ham?

Fixed!

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

There used to be these buildings full of books that I could just borrow for free.

[–] linucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Love books and huge fan of libraries but how do you find the right book in the ocean of books?

[–] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Ask the librarian nicely and they'll probably be able to point you in the right direction. Cataloguing information is kind of their thing, and helping people get access to that information is why many of them join the profession.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Instructions unclear, dick stuck in card catalog. Send help, preferably a hot librarian.

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Franz is here to help you, little man. Bend over and breath deeply. It will all be over in fifteen to twenty minutes.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Youtube u gotta get the widest set of opinions possible. Unfortunatly peertube just lacks content.

[–] linucs@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I repeat what I said to the other commenter: how do you find actual good and trustable channels on a specific topic?

[–] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Finding a trustworthy source is the hardest part. I generally avoid anyone speaking too loudly of the subject. Someone who’s knowledgeable and confident, most times, can present calmly with context that’s accessible to most people.

Neil deGrasse Tyson is a good example. He’s a good place to start for a broad range of topics. Then if I want more details I can dig deeper on my own. A lot of times, his commentary requires digging deeper because he speaks too broadly.

I always check the source of a report or article; if there is no source, I don’t trust it. The source is usually a good place to ‘bookmark’ for further research.

Edit: a few days later and I’ve come across the perfect example. Here Tyson explains “the tide doesn’t come in and out”. What I think he should more clearly say is there’s no “high tide” and “low tide”. To me, and I could be an idiot, I thought he was going to explain the action of the waves coming in and out at the cost line every 30 seconds or so. It’s not that he’s wrong but sometimes his choice of words isn’t super on point. Here’s more info about Tidal Range https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/tides.html

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I watch videos and read articles and use LLMs to give me the key points to grasp the basics. Then build upon that knowledge with more focused learning.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I do this plus follow competent people in those fields on Mastodon/reddit/etc for current news relevant to practitioners in the field

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't watch or listen....READ!

[–] bitfucker@programming.dev -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why do we have teachers then? Listening and watching is absolutely a valid strategy of learning. You just need to make sure that the speakers are trustworthy on the subject.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 years ago

Probably meant don't rely on youtube, (as people produce fake info) while text books are rypically vetted, except in USA where Texas writes the curriculum supporting oil and gas and denying clinate change--and the other states purchase the Texas curriculum