this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
384 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

84433 readers
4585 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 hour ago
[–] mPony@kbin.earth 13 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If media companies want a consistent user base, media companies can politically lobby for their users to receive wages high enough to include disposable income. If media companies won't go to bat for their subscribers, why should their subscribers give them anything more than short shrift? (there's your phrase for the day)

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

Sorry, best they can do is lobby for year-long contracts only.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago

Because everything they want to watch isn’t on ONE single service so I can’t say I blame them.

Also, streaming companies boast this as a feature, so they can’t really complain.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Someone should teach them how to pirate.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

this sends a clear message though. No the old "just hook them, then we have guaranteed income forever" isn't actually working. That's great.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 6 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Piracy sends an even clearer message.

"Fuck you, I'm not playing your game"

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 0 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

Except though that they don't really have the data to see how many people are really doing that at a time.

If they did I swear I think they would raid homes over it until people were so scared they'd stop.

I pirate everything btw.

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works -1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 17 minutes ago)

They can see how many downloads and seeds but not from a single place.

Everyone in USA uses a VPN to torrent unless they are just asking to get a letter sent and service disconnected.

So they can tell people accessed it but not how many people of that group would have been able to legally pay for the service anyway. (If I'm not mistaken a lot of those streaming services are US only and at least if they aren't they offer completely different libraries based off what country you're in)

Someone in Africa or Brazil who had no way to pay for it anyway are also included in those metrics making them kind of pointless if you're an american company selling american media to Americans only.

Although I'm sure they justeasure it as "missed sales" anyway even though that isn't the truth. They don't offer their services to all 200+ countries and a lot of piracy isn't just US based.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 hours ago

Somehow, nobody takes issue with the cancel and renew instead of purchasing part. So they were successfully indoctrinated into the you will own nothing part, except the and you will be happy didn't work out.

[–] Squidious@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 hours ago

DVDs at thrift stores for a buck. My collection is massive and still growing. My Steam backlog will outlive me.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So... they're taking advantage of one of the selling-features of streaming services, that being the ability to scale your spend pending your own personal preferences. In the early days of streaming services, they had enough content to justify paying a monthly subscription each month -- it's not the customer's fault that streaming got enshitified. Hell, a bunch of them switching to 'weekly episodes' was just a very poorly disguised attempt to drag out how many months they thought their one flagship show could capture audiences. The old practice of dumping a whole season all at once in one month, because you knew you'd have another season of some other good show the next month, is practically gone -- with streaming reverting back to the old network practices they'd usurped.

Same with games. Tons of titles are just shitty early access things, things that get abandoned mid-development, things that rely on a live-service platform that companies'll shut down a month or two later, and so on. And some titles are askin like $80+ for their shitty offerings. Yeah, that's not the customers fault in the slightest. They're right to look for discounted offers, what sane person wouldn't?

In my experience the only games I get at full price anymore are the ones which are heavily discounted from their original price or were cheap from the beginning. For example something like Rimworld when I first got it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 14 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Also all of that interfaces really suck it's like they don't actually want you to use their platforms.

Apple TV is the buggiest piece of crap I've ever used, Amazon prime TVs interface is confusing as hell, even Disney can't pull it off with their categories of Marvel, Star Wars, kids movies, and other, where other contains literally everything else.

There are streaming services that only contain four seasons of a show with 16 seasons, then there is a different streaming services that contain everything but those first four seasons.

Is it any wonder people pirate, they raise the price diminish the catalogue split everything up into 60 different services and all of them have terrible UX. It's like they don't even want my money.

[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

Apple TV is the buggiest piece of crap I've ever used…

Wait, the streaming service or the device? Because the device is the best out there. The streaming service? No idea; I use these:

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Works very well on my Roku.

It’s more intuitive than Amazon and D+. Only Netflix is as smooth and useable for me.

🤷‍♂️

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

Meanwhile, the folks over at FMHY had to revise their star system because streaming services have become incredibly competitive and to find more ways to differentiate them all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 54 points 6 hours ago

So you're saying people without money don't act like they have disposable income? Fucking science!

[–] PetteriPano@lemmy.world 32 points 5 hours ago (12 children)

Millennial here.

I grew up with sneakernet through irc-napster-kazaa-limewire-directconnect-bittorrent-oneswarm. I gave all that up when netflix and spotify.

Those subscriptions have been ended a couple of years back and the eye patch is back on.

Netflix' catalogue has just diminished, as everyone who owns rights to the good stuff want to do their own streaming service.

I wasn't really listening that much ro spotify, but when they started injecting ads into podcasts I bid adieu. (Yes, injected - I'd listen to an English podcast and get very local ads between segments).

[–] PerfectDark@lemmy.world 13 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sturlabragason@lemmy.world 58 points 7 hours ago (6 children)

Is this because they don’t know how to torrent? Or did the “you wouldn’t download a car” ads get into the water supply?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 32 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

99% of internet users don't know what a torrent is.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 14 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Which is probably a good thing for torrent users

[–] bryndos@fedia.io 9 points 4 hours ago

torrent is useless, who wants to connect to a million people who are only sharing the arch iso?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 7 points 4 hours ago

Torrenting isn't difficult but it's also not very user friendly.

I don't really know what a magnet link is, I just know it's what I want. There's also a bunch of stats and settings in my torrenting app that I don't understand but apparently it's ok to just ignore them. I'm fine with that, but that level of confusion is very off-putting to most people.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 102 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Won't, or can't afford to?

[–] lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Especially video games. Honestly as a casual gamer I get it. Games are expensive and they are a gamble. I've bought games in the past and played them for half hour and realized I hate it lol. I rarely buy games now, especially if it's not a franchise I already know and like, because I can't afford the gamble. If I do I buy a physical copy so I can sell it on.

At least with streaming services you can check and know there's a few hours of shows you will definitely watch. It's still tol expensive and I'm cancelling mine but it is less of a gamble than video games.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 34 minutes ago

I know many people are against this logic but you can pirate things as a demo and buy them if you find them good.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 66 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

insert small mexican girl

"Why not both?"

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 66 points 8 hours ago (9 children)

Millenial here, I have zero subscriptions, the only thing close to that is that I manually pay for a gift card for Geoguessr once a year.

I do it this way so I don't forget the cost of the service and should I come onto bad times, it is not something that will automatically renew and keep charging.

I am considering getting a lifetime subscription to Nebula, it is very expensive, but just a single payment that can be budgeted for, and once paid I'll keep access even through bad times.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 2 points 3 hours ago

Gen Z here, also do not have any subscriptions except for a library card which is only 12 € a year (and also my server and domains and rent and electricity and internet). There are just so many movies and games to be watched and played I don't see myself running empty anytime soon. Often times I visit there without a specific thing to rent and go out with 5 movies to watch, they actually curate the shelf fairly well and have more interesting/new things out for display. For newer releases I do go to the movies but my library does get a copy once there is a physical copy you just have to wait a bit until its your turn.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm not subscribed to any video streaming sites, too pricey for just watching one thing once in a while. As for audio, I have Tidal and so far it has been quite good actually; but if that ever changes I'll just revert back to physical media/piracy.

Steam sales tend to be pretty good, what's even better is that keysites tend to drop the price accordingly.

load more comments
view more: next ›