this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
810 points (99.2% liked)

News

37508 readers
1617 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The US Department of Agriculture has spent the past week notifying people that the country is (allegedly) overrun by individuals who are fraudulently claiming SNAP benefits, while (allegedly) driving luxury vehicles.

“In just ONE state, 14,000 individuals receiving SNAP benefits were driving LUXURY VEHICLES!” Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins posted on X last week. The official USDA account made similar claims, which were then amplified by figures like Senator Ted Cruz and Senator Rand Paul.

Those numbers are questionable at best. For one thing, the report they come from doesn’t name the state where thousands of people are allegedly buying Ferraris while using government money to buy food. For another, that report doesn’t include any explanation of its methodology.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

People experience job loss, lose their income become briefly eligible for food stamps get a job get off food stamps ALL the time during this difficult period they don't lose their homes, cars, fancy clothes or their iphones.

[–] lifeinlarkhall@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

Ah of course it's the poor that are ruining your country - that makes sense 🙄

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 7 points 13 hours ago

Someone tell these people to shut the fuck up already.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Businesses not paying workers fair wages like Walmart forcing 1.6 million by themselves to take public assistance like food support is going to effect a ton of people and be a huge draw on the system compared to any other fraud on the system.

26.8% of 41.7 million is 11 million people. How much do you want to bet they can't find 11 hundred people committing fraud against the system like employers are.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/11/14/what-the-data-says-about-food-stamps-in-the-us/

Tax payers subsidizing corporations to further exploit tax payers

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Go after the real welfare queens. The Walton family, Elon Musk, the oil and gas industry. Big corporate farming. Ending subsidies for oil and gas alone would pay for Medicare for all

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

When I lived in a poor area I saw a ton of luxury vehicles but they were a decade older than most non-luxury cars and were beat to shit. I'd believe the numbers but I don't think they say what this idiot is implying.

Its demoralizing that this type of messaging resonates with such a large portion of Americans, honestly.

[–] Folstar@lemmus.org 16 points 1 day ago

The Gang of Pedos has never let something as trivial as evidence guide their world view. Also not big fans of consent.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Look over there at the guy stealing bread for his family, no mind the BILLIONS of dollars being stolen by this admin every week. God i hate the GOP.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I know someone on SNAP benefits. She drives a 25 year old Buick Lesabre with over 200,000 miles on it . Technically it’s a “luxury car,” which she got for $800.

Their stats are bullshit, spun in such a way as to churn up resentment towards the poorest , so the wealthiest can bilk more money from the middle.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I drove a '98 Lasabre for most of the 2010s. Absolutely loved it: parts were ready to find, could repair it myself at home, and the dashboard had so many weird sliders and knobs that it felt like piloting a TARDIS.

Anyone enjoying that kind of luxury should be starving to death. It's just not fair for someone to have both a beautiful, faux-wood paneled dashboard and three meals per day.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A Buick LeSabre was my first car. It was the 1989 model. Red "velvet" interior. That thing was sexy af

[–] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Same, we called it the boat and referred to the backseat as the couch. It was defeated by a young sapling in a low-speed head-on collision unfortunately. I wish theyd make something like that again but its probably past its time.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The Tax Evasion and Avoidance of billionaires is many times the entire budget of this kind of thing.

You could literally make up for 100% fraud in things like food stamp by making somebody like Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos pay the same effective tax rate as everybody else.

Even if these claims from the far-right of widespread fraud and abuses in social security were true, they would still be like distracting people from a raging forest fire by waving a sparkler.

[–] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

We just need to implement something like a 1% wealth tax for any entity (people or businesses) with net assets over say $5M. Having more than that has minimal justified purpose

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A remix of the old welfare queen lie. smh. Some guy probably used his mom's food stamps card to get fast food once and they're going to make it seem like a billion dollars in theft.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You simply can't it won't work. POS systems cannot be configured to do this.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I haven't had a food card for a bit. It was just a prepaid card. I don't really know what small and insignificant way it's used that these fucks would complain about but I just made an example off the top of my head.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It’s prepaid with a Visa logo or something like that but it won’t work on anything you are not supposed to buy.

I think some people get other money loaded on it that’s not for food. Like mothers buying school supplies or clothing.

[–] ShawiniganHandshake@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

The Welfare Queen was a real person best known by the name Linda Taylor but she was uniquely talented at defrauding the government and she went to prison in 1978 for welfare fraud.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm aware.

I'm also aware that she defrauded the government something like $10,000, was caught almost immediately, and as you said, punished. Reagan made her out to be a crime lord stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Real or not, the lie is the gross misrepresentation of who and what she was to the american people, used as a justification to cut social aid programs for millions in need.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There's also no knowing what folks had when the floor fell out from under them. That Escalade might have been half paid off when they lost their source of income. Conservatives've been on this same bullshit for decades.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

"He obviously took advantage of the system or did something illegal like selling drugs. Everyone knows it's systematically impossible for a minority to get ahead on their own"

Maybe a little too on the nose, but all their arguments are some variation of that.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

"Look at them! They're driving luxury vehicles like a fancy foreign Honda civic and the urban elite bicycle"

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 182 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

I'd rather a hundred people get benefits they "don't need" than have one person go without the support they require.

Not that it's even happening, but even if it were I really wouldn't care even a little bit. And furthermore, food stamp benefits are pathetic in the US.

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 46 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I remember some Republican chud or another saying they'd rather have innocent people imprisoned than let a single criminal walk free. Absolutely cannot fathom that mindset. Completely ghoulish.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] dasrael@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

evidence has never been a concern when it comes to the right.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This is literally just the '80s "welfare queen" lie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like "luxury vehicles" is the same buzzword as "assault weapons." A meaningless buzzword to evoke emotion.

What's a "luxury vehicle?" What's the cutoff? Are they in a nicer Honda or a Lotus? Seeing as how this country's citizens are famously one illness or ouchie away from financial ruin, did they purchase this vehicle before or after needing assistance? Are they still making payments or is it paid off?

Facts and hard criteria or GTFO with this nonsense.

It's literally just trying to goad the struggling to pull the rug from the destitute, while the rich pop their champaign and laugh. It's class warfare rhetoric to take the heat off the Epstein class, and anybody falling for it is a damned fool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

luxury vehicles

What do you want to bet they’re talking about poorly maintained 15+ year old lexuses and 30+ year old bmws? Just kidding, it’s most likely entirely unfounded.

[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I'd go even further and say that they are classifying vehicles themselves as a luxury, not even the make or model.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The luxury cars are probably 15 year old Cadillacs or something.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 34 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Dude, it seems everything the GOP claims lacks evidence.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zamotic@lemmy.zip 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Watch they are going to fight to increase restrictions on SNAP benefit "handouts", but a ton of rich people fraudulently took out COVID loans, actually bought cars, never paid them back, and there is legit evidence but they were never prosecuted.

The new slogan for America should be: Protect the fellow rich, beat the poor down into dust.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tired_n_bored@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

fuck republicans

load more comments
view more: next ›